E-Discovery Results in Second Look at Records Management Policies
Winston-Salem partner Robin Shea was quoted by SHRM in an article on e-discovery and records management.
(subscription required for access)
"However, Robin Shea, an attorney with Constangy in Winston-Salem, N.C., said that since the enactment of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, which theoretically allows employees to recover based on long-past employment decisions, her ideal has been to preserve everything and have no automatic destruction. But she acknowledged that this is too burdensome and expensive for some employers. The next best thing is to retain the records for the longest applicable statute of limitations, she said.
“We recommend these long retention periods not because the Rules of Civil Procedure require them but because the information retained may very well provide the evidence needed to help the employer defend itself,” Shea remarked.
But once litigation arises, a litigation hold bars the destruction of records potentially relevant to the issues in the case. It would violate the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for an employer to destroy ESI that was potentially discoverable after the employer became aware of the threat of litigation, Shea noted.
HR or an in-house attorney should coordinate the entire e-discovery effort, according to Shea.
Depending on the nature of the litigation, usually it will be necessary to involve someone from the substantive area from which the litigation arises, Shea noted. For example, if the plaintiff is a sales representative, the e-discovery team should include at least one member of sales management. This person can describe the various types of ESI that are available and interpret them for HR, the attorneys and IT.
Employees should be notified about the records retention policy and understand that failure to preserve relevant records can result in substantial liability for the company, she said."