• "Card-check
recognition" would be required if amendments to the
National Labor Relations Act introduced by Senator Charles
Schumer (D-N.Y.) are successful. The amendments, which would
require employers to recognize a union if a majority of employees
signed authorization cards or petitions, contains several
of the more onerous provisions that were part of the "labor
law reform" in the late 1970s that very nearly succeeded.
In support of the proposed amendments, Schumer pointed to
the decline in union representation, from 20 percent of the
work force in 1983 to the current 13.2 percent. The Democrat
presidential candidates have all announced support for card-check
recognition, and Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts was
the first to specifically support Schumer’s bill.
• Card-check recognition and
negotiations have created 3,100 new members of the United
Autoworkers who are employed by Freightliner
LLC, a unit of Daimler-Chrysler. The three-year agreements made
in December and running through March 2007 provide an $800 signing
bonus, elimination of employee contributions toward health insurance
premiums and continuation of company pension benefits as employees
are moved into a new UAW-Freightliner retirement plan. Wage increases
over the three-year term will be $1.25 - $1.40, with an extra
25¢ the second and third year for skilled trades.
•
The present NLRB rule on election objections based on the conduct
of third parties may be changing soon. Currently, an election
result may be challenged based on the conduct of a person or
entity who is an agent of neither the employer nor the union
if the third party created "a general atmosphere of fear
and reprisal that made a fair election impossible." The
Board issued a decision on the last day of 2003 that indicates
the standard for asserting this type of challenge may soon become
easier. Although the Board upheld the election, which the employer
lost by four votes, the two Republican members said in their
concurrences that they would change the rule to allow a challenge
if the third party’s conduct affected only "a determinative
number of voters." In this case, the evidence showed that
the third party conduct affected only one eligible voter.
• Former management attorney Ronald E. Meisburg has been appointed
a new Republican member of the NLRB, replacing former member
Acosta, who resigned in August. The recess appointment made while
the Senate was not in session means that Meisburg can serve until
the Senate adjourns its last session in 2004. If the Senate confirms
his appointment when it resumes, his term will expire August
27, 2008.
• Unions are continuing to win
more elections, according to NLRB data analyzed by BNA PLUS,
the research division of the Bureau of National Affairs. The win
rate has increased from 48.2% in 1996 to 56.5% in 2002, and to 57.3% in the first
six months of 2003.
• The Teamsters Union continues to reign as the most active of all AFL-CIO
Unions in NLRB election petitions and elections. The Union participates in more
than
three times the elections of its closest rival, and is also far and away the
leader in strikes, with almost 100 occurring between July 1, 2002, and June 30,
2003. Its membership has held steady at approximately 1.4 million, despite a
decline in members from the transportation industry. It also leads in the number
of decertifications held and lost. President Hoffa continues to take steps designed
to end the consent decree of 1989, which resulted from widespread corruption
that was illegal under the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
Act.
• Union objections to NLRB elections won by employers are commonly
upheld where the employer has withheld bonus payments or has threatened to do
so. Distribution
center workers were informed by a circular shortly
before the election
that the
manager did not know "whether the workers would still be eligible for bonuses
if the union won" and that unionized workers at other company facilities
did not participate in such a program. Two Board members found that these statements
constituted a threat that employees would be precluded from obtaining
their next
bonus, scheduled to be paid soon after the election.
- top -