• The newly formed
Change to Win Coalition will hold its first convention on September
27 in St. Louis. Teamsters President Hoffa in his Labor Day
message promises members that the new seven-member Federation
is committed to industry-wide organizing, coordinated bargaining
and effective political action – asserting that the Teamsters’ organizing
budget has grown by 400% and that more than 30,000 new workers
were organized in the past two years. The Teamsters, Service
Employees and United Food and Commercial Workers withdrew from
the AFL-CIO this summer, and Coalition member Carpenters Union
had earlier withdrawn in 2001. UNITE-HERE withdrew this September.
The Laborers International Union and United Farm Workers remain
AFL-CIO affiliates as well as Coalition members.
• The Davis-Bacon Act, which requires federal construction
contractors to pay “prevailing wages,” has been suspended with
regard to reconstruction in the areas damaged and destroyed by
Hurricane Katrina. The President’s message to Congress
on September 8 informed it of his action under Section 6 of the
Act and of his declaration of a national emergency. Representative
Charles Norwood (R-Ga.) of the House Education and Workforce
Committee was among those requesting action, stating, “Davis-Bacon
Act rules are onerous and drive up the cost of any project…and
the nation cannot afford that kind of inefficiency, red tape
and inflated costs when we have an entire region to rebuild,
largely at taxpayer expense.”
• Things are tough all over, according to a recent study
comparing the costs of health care for union versus non-union
employers
conducted by the Employment Policy Foundation. The Washington-based
business research group found that rising health-care costs are
causing pain for both types of employers. Comparisons for the
period 1983 through 2003 showed that health-care costs for unionized
employers had risen from a per-employee average of $1,608 to
$5,374 in the twenty-year period, an increase of 334 percent.
The non-union companies’ per-employee costs rose from $1,285
to $4,752 in the same period, an increase of 370 percent. The
figures reflect that the rising health cost concerns are predictably
beyond the control of benefit negotiators. Escalating costs of
health care made all other factors in collective bargaining “subordinate,” said
the AFL-CIO leader of the Federation Collective Bargaining Center.
He noted that increases in wages and other benefits remain relatively
low when previous levels of health benefits are to continue in
place. Some employers are reported to have joined with their
unions to advocate and financially support more “universal
healthcare” initiatives.
• Court strikes down California “neutrality” law,
saying California employers that receive state funds cannot be
prohibited
from making expenditures that assist or deter employee unionization. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals found the California “neutrality” law
in conflict with and preempted by the National Labor Relations
Act. Employer associations had challenged the law, and the Court
agreed that the effect of it was to chill employers from exercising “free
speech rights that are explicitly protected by Congress under
the [Act].” The ruling is significant from an Appeals Court
noted for its liberal rulings, and should have influence in other
areas of the country.
• Union leader outlines corporate campaign tactics. At the recent
convention of the American Bar Association, David Prouty, General
Counsel for UNITE-HERE, provided the inside scoop. Prouty said
corporate campaigns are increasingly being used to achieve acceptance
of card-check and neutrality agreements; achieve first-time contracts
with newly unionized workplaces; and end strikes and lockouts.
He identified several tactics:
-
building coalitions
with non-union groups (such as civil rights organizations,
churches, and environmental groups) to pressure
employers;
-
engaging in public relations
campaigns designed to capture the attention of the media and
the public;
-
launching legislative initiatives
designed to achieve specific organized labor goals;
-
appealing
to local, state, and federal regulatory agencies to bring
pressure on employers;
-
taking legal action against
the employers in areas such as civil rights and wage-and-hour,
-
organizing
consumer-focused campaigns including boycotts and leafleting;
-
exerting
financial pressure by contacting the employer’s
lenders and investment partners;
-
filing shareholder
proposals designed to attract attention or compel the employer
to negotiate with the union;
-
and, exerting pressure internally
through employee involvement.
Prouty’s remarks were reported in BNA’s
Daily Report.
- top -