• NLRB still divided on
supervisory status of front-line management in health care. A panel consisting
of Members Liebman and Walsh,
with Chairman Battista dissenting, had held that a registered
nurse in charge of weekend staff at a nursing home was not a “supervisor” within
the meaning of the NLRA and therefore that she was unlawfully
terminated for supporting a union organizing effort. While the
case was on appeal to the Eighth Circuit, Battista and Member
Schaumber voted to reconsider the ruling. The new majority (with
Member Liebman dissenting) found that the nurse exercised independent
judgment in issuing disciplinary write-ups, sending employees
home early, and in preparing an employee evaluation. She was
the highest-ranking and highest paid employee on duty on weekends
and was found to be responsible for patient care, employee work
performance, adequate staffing levels, and dealing with patients’ families.
The Supreme Court has held that individuals who exercise independent
judgment in directing employees are supervisors and not “employees” under
the NLRA.
Observation: at the beginning of a union
campaign, an employer in health care or any other industry should
determine
the “supervisory” status of its employees. Supervisors
may lawfully be required to support the interests of management.
The nurse at issue in this case either had not been told this,
or did not understand.
• A study of union negotiated wage increases for
the first nine months of 2005 shows them slightly below those
for the corresponding
period in 2004. Negotiated first-year average wage rate increases
were 3.1%, compared with 3.3% in 2004; second-year rate increases
were at 3.3%, compared with 3.7% in 2004; and third-year rate
increases were 3.2%, the same as in 2004. The percentage rate
increase for the manufacturing sector (2.2%) was markedly lower
than for “Construction” or for “State/Local
Government.” However, lump sum settlements for 2005 increased
the rate for manufacturing to 3.1%, and increased the first-year
increase for “All Settlements” from 3.1% to 3.5%.
Even with the lump-sum settlements included, the increases were
lower for manufacturing in 2005 than in 2004. This information
came from the Collective Bargaining Negotiations and Contracts
service published by the Bureau of National Affairs.
• Teamster Union members will vote for a General President and
International Officers in the fall of 2006. James P. Hoffa is
expected to be opposed by Tom Leedham who challenged Hoffa in
2001 for the five-year term that is expiring. Leedham has the
support of the Teamsters for a Democratic Union, which has criticized
Hoffa’s performance, blaming him for pension benefit cuts
and failure to root out corruption in the Union which led to
the resignation of the internal “Watch Dog Committee.” (Hoffa
had promised to end Justice Department oversight as a part of
the Consent Decree of 1989, resulting from widespread corruption
and Mafia influence.) Leedham is a former International Vice
President and Director of the Warehouse Division, and is currently
the principal officer for Local 206 in Oregon. Another announced
candidate is Thomas O’Donnell, now an International Vice
President and also President of Local 817 in New York.
• A divided NLRB found that the Teamsters unlawfully
fined unionized route salesmen who crossed another union’s picket lines
at a supermarket. The applicable collective bargaining agreement
for the Teamsters route salesmen promised “…the Union
will not authorize any strikes, work stoppages, or interference
with the activities required of employees under this Agreement.” Nevertheless,
when the Teamsters crossed picket lines set up by the United
Food and Commercial Workers union, they were fined $1,000 each.
The contract also contained a “picket line clause” that
protects employees from employer “discharge or disciplinary
action in the event an employee refuses to enter any property
involved in a lawful primary labor dispute, or refused to go
through or work behind any lawful picket line.” The union
fines were designed to support a sympathy strike, according to
the Board majority opinion, for the no strike clause applied
to any strike, without exception. Thus the union’s action
against the member would force the member to withhold his services
in sympathy with the strikers, and thus violate the Union’s
no-strike agreement. Member Liebman disagreed with this analysis
and would have permitted this “union discipline” as
an internal union matter.
• Change to Win Federation’s September convention
designated 75% of its per capita taxes to organizing, reaffirmed
earlier
goals and elected officers. One of the announced goals in assisting
organizing efforts was to “reflect the diversity and commitment
to change of today’s workforce.” It will be an advocate
for the poor and disenfranchised in what is termed “economic
class warfare” along with minority, immigrant and women’s
rights. Anna Burger was named Chair of the Federation’s
Executive Committee. She is one of the highest ranking women
in the labor movement as the International Secretary-Treasurer
of the SEIU. Edgar Romney became the Federation’s Secretary-Treasurer,
and was the first African-American to be Executive Vice President
of UNITE.
- top -