Posts tagged Title VII.

I’d call this “reasonable accommodation for dummies,” but y’all aren’t dumb. Continue Reading ›

Five cautions for employers. Continue Reading ›

"Reverse discrimination," ADA, religion, and nationwide injunctions. Continue Reading ›

Don't overreact. (Or underreact.) Continue Reading ›

Don't expect the EEOC to appeal. Continue Reading ›

TL;DR: Some big changes. Continue Reading ›

Is the media buzz accurate? Continue Reading ›

Then again, you might. Continue Reading ›

And you thought they’d be asleep the next four years. Continue Reading ›

I've been asking this a lot lately. Continue Reading ›

A (not so) perfect cluster. Continue Reading ›

You can't make this stuff up. Continue Reading ›

The bathroom battle (among others) continues. Continue Reading ›

Here are the four things the employer did right. Continue Reading ›

Employer's DEI mandate scores a win. Continue Reading ›

Just a little harm will do. Continue Reading ›

What's good for the goose . . . Continue Reading ›

What's legal, and what's not? Continue Reading ›

Will the Court be opening the floodgates? Continue Reading ›

In other words, which presidents can we -- ahem -- blame? Continue Reading ›

And opens up a can of worms. Continue Reading ›

So misunderstood! Continue Reading ›

Second post in our series. Continue Reading ›

A new series. Continue Reading ›

In determining what counts as harassment in the workplace, context matters. Continue Reading ›

Here's what's been going on this week. Continue Reading ›

EEOC takes a stand on bathrooms and gender identity. Continue Reading ›

... and have been asking about for months. Continue Reading ›

Can employers breathe easy now? Continue Reading ›

And employers will like it. Continue Reading ›

The EEOC is inviting us to ask for opinion letters! Continue Reading ›

In light of his Supreme Court win in June. Continue Reading ›

The EEOC has started issuing right-to-sue letters again. Continue Reading ›

And what employers need to do . . . assuming they haven't already. Continue Reading ›

The case will go on. Continue Reading ›

A bit of impeachment/employment law trivia. Continue Reading ›

"It could have been worse" edition. Continue Reading ›

Who's the "swing vote," the "parade of horribles," and more. Continue Reading ›

According to the DOJ. Continue Reading ›

UPDATED (8/17/19)! Continue Reading ›

No legal authority to issue its Enforcement Guidance! Continue Reading ›

A tough situation. Could it have been handled better? Continue Reading ›

This claim against the "Museum of Sex" should fail. Continue Reading ›

What the Supreme Court's decision in Fort Bend really means. Continue Reading ›

How's your employment law history knowledge? Continue Reading ›

Court says no, in one of the weirdest cases ever. Continue Reading ›

The status, the arguments, and my predictions. Continue Reading ›

Another chapter in a continuing saga. Continue Reading ›

Can you occasionally skip the EEOC and go straight to court if there's a really good reason? Continue Reading ›

This case will blow your mind. Continue Reading ›

UPDATED 12/4/18: I was right to be skeptical. Continue Reading ›

Delayed again! Continue Reading ›

This case makes my head hurt. Continue Reading ›

We may know by the end of this month. Continue Reading ›

Nah. They'll just agree to disagree. Continue Reading ›

Hurry up and wait. Continue Reading ›

Commission adopts an expansive view of "sex." Continue Reading ›

C'mon, Supreme Court: Settle this one! Continue Reading ›

An argument can be made. Continue Reading ›

Hively v. Ivy Tech is ovah! Continue Reading ›

But will the EEOC be allowed to defend? Continue Reading ›

Pow! Pow! Pow! Continue Reading ›

And one judge is not pleased. Continue Reading ›

Here is a judge an employer can love. Continue Reading ›

How would Supreme Court contender Amul Thapar be for employers? Continue Reading ›

Another federal appeals court will soon decide whether Title VII prohibits sexual orientation discrimination. Continue Reading ›

The employer in the "gay skydiver case" has reportedly asked for Supreme Court review. Continue Reading ›

The state Civil Rights Commission broadens its interpretation of "sex discrimination." Continue Reading ›

Do it the old-fashioned way. Continue Reading ›

The Sixth Circuit decision seems overall correct, although it contains some "woke dicta," too. Continue Reading ›

Let's look at the arguments, pro and con, that the Supreme Court is likely to hear someday. Continue Reading ›

Today's decision (all 163 pages of it) is from the Second Circuit (Connecticut, New York, and Vermont). Continue Reading ›

It's possible to discriminate against someone of your own faith. And illegal. Continue Reading ›

The issue of whether Title VII prohibits sexual orientation bias will have to be resolved another day. Continue Reading ›

A boss who grabs an employee's breasts without her consent is indeed guilty of sexual harassment. Continue Reading ›

What are you grateful for this year? Here is my list. Continue Reading ›

How much do you know about an employer’s reasonable accommodation obligations under the law(s)? Take this quiz and find out!

Question 1: Which of the following federal employment laws require reasonable 

accommodation, either by their terms or as courts have interpreted them over the years?

A. The Americans with Disabilities Act

B. The Family and Medical Leave Act

C. Title VII-religion

D. The Nursing Mothers Act

E. The Pregnancy Discrimination Act

F. All of the above

G. A, C, D, and E

ANSWER: G. The FMLA does not require reasonable accommodation, but all of these other laws do. And there is some overlap between the FMLA and pregnancy or disability accommodation because leave for pregnancy or disability can be a form of reasonable accommodation. Continue Reading ›

Asserting that the U.S. Department of Justice “must interpret Title VII as written by Congress,” the DOJ is reversing the Obama-era interpretation of Title VII, taking the position that Title VII does not prohibit discrimination based on gender identity.

In a memorandum issued this week by Attorney General Jeff Sessions, the DOJ formally withdrew a 2014 memorandum by then-Attorney General Eric Holder taking the contrary position.

Attorney General Sessions contends that transgender individuals are protected from discrimination based on sex, but not based on “gender identity per se.” He noted that Title VII refers only to discrimination based on “sex,” which is “ordinarily defined to mean biologically male or female.” He also noted that Congress had specifically referred to gender identity in other contexts, indicating that it would have done so in Title VII had that been its intent. Finally, he said that Title VII did not prohibit treatment “that [took] account of the sex of employees but [did] not impose different burdens on similarly situated members of each sex,” specifically referencing sex-specific bathrooms.

The memorandum concludes as follows:

The Justice Department must and will continue to affirm the dignity of all people, including transgender individuals. Nothing in this memorandum should be construed to condone mistreatment on the basis of gender identity, or to express a policy view on whether Congress should amend Title VII to provide different or additional protections. Nor does this memorandum remove or reduce the protections against discrimination on the basis of sex that Congress has provided all individuals, including transgender individuals, under Title VII. . . . The Department of Justice has vigorously enforced [federal laws specifically protecting transgender individuals], and will continue to do so, on behalf of all Americans, including transgender Americans.

The DOJ position is not a surprise, given that it recently submitted a “friend of the court” brief making roughly the same arguments in a sexual orientation discrimination caseContinue Reading ›

With President Trump in office for nine months now, it is hard to believe that none of his people are yet on the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The four current Commissioners, including the Acting Chair, Republican Victoria Lipnic, and former Chair Jenny Yang, were all appointed by President Obama.

But that may change soon. The Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee held hearings this week on the nominations of Janet Dhillon for EEOC Chair and Daniel Gade for EEOC Commissioner.

(The Senate confirmation vote for William Emanuel, whose nomination as a Member of the National Labor Relations Board has been pending for quite some time, is expected to take place imminently.)

Here’s what we have learned about Ms. Dhillon and Dr. Gade from this week’s HELP Committee testimony, according to an article in Bloomberg BNA’s Daily Labor ReportContinue Reading ›

This is Constangy’s flagship law blog, founded in 2010 by Robin Shea, who is chief legal editor and a regular contributor. This nationally recognized blog also features posts from other Constangy attorneys in the areas of immigration, labor relations, and sports law, keeping HR professionals and employers informed about the latest legal trends.

Search

Get Updates By Email

Subscribe

Archives

Legal Influencer Lexology Badge ABA Web 100 Badge
Jump to Page

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When using this website, Constangy and certain third parties may collect and use cookies or similar technologies to enhance your experience. These technologies may collect information about your device, activity on our website, and preferences. Some cookies are essential to site functionality, while others help us analyze performance and usage trends to improve our content and features.

Please note that if you return to this website from a different browser or device, you may need to reselect your cookie preferences.

For more information about our privacy practices, including your rights and choices, please see our Privacy Policy. 

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Strictly Necessary Cookies are essential for the website to function, and cannot be turned off. We use this type of cookie for purposes such as security, network management, and accessibility. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but if you do so, some parts of the site will not work. 

Functionality Cookies

Always Active

Functionality Cookies are used to enhance the functionality and personalization of this website. These cookies support features like embedded content (such as video or audio), keyword search highlighting, and remembering your preferences across pages—for example, your cookie choices or form inputs during submission.

Some of these cookies are managed by third-party service providers whose features are embedded on our site. These cookies do not store personal information and are necessary for certain site features to work properly.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek