PAGA deal is (mostly) good news for California employers

Analysis

At long last, at least some relief is coming for California employers on the Private Attorneys General Act. Gov. Gavin Newson (D) has struck a deal with California legislative leaders, business, and labor to amend PAGA in exchange for the withdrawal of a November ballot initiative sponsored by business associations.

The terms of the bill have not yet been released (we will issue an update when they are) but per the Governor’s offices and other sources, we understand that there will be major changes that will benefit employers, including the following:

  • Changes to cure provisions, which could lead to reduced penalties for employers who take quick steps to fix policies and practices and make employees whole after receiving PAGA notices. 
  • Expansion of the number of PAGA sections that give the employer an opportunity to cure. 
  • Additional and more robust cure provisions for small employers. 
  • Allowing courts to limit the scope of claims at trial – in other words, reinstating “manageability” as an important threshold for plaintiffs to proceed at trial. 
  • Requiring that the representative plaintiff be personally aggrieved as to allclaims brought in a representative action.

On the less positive side for employers, we expect the following additional changes:

  • Employers who are found to have acted “maliciously, fraudulently or oppressively” could be subject to new, higher penalties. 
  • The percentage awarded to employees is expected to increase from the current 25 percent to 35 percent.
  • Courts will be authorized to award injunctive relief to compel businesses to remedy workplace violations. 

Although not all the expected changes are for the benefit of employers, overall the news is good. The expected changes relating to standing and manageability should roll back unfavorable court rulings in recent years that made it far more difficult and expensive for employers to defend themselves in PAGA lawsuits. 

June 27 is the deadline for withdrawing the ballot initiative, so the legislation must be enacted by that date.

Subscribe for Updates
Jump to Page

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When using this website, Constangy and certain third parties may collect and use cookies or similar technologies to enhance your experience. These technologies may collect information about your device, activity on our website, and preferences. Some cookies are essential to site functionality, while others help us analyze performance and usage trends to improve our content and features.

Please note that if you return to this website from a different browser or device, you may need to reselect your cookie preferences.

For more information about our privacy practices, including your rights and choices, please see our Privacy Policy. 

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Strictly Necessary Cookies are essential for the website to function, and cannot be turned off. We use this type of cookie for purposes such as security, network management, and accessibility. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but if you do so, some parts of the site will not work. 

Functionality Cookies

Always Active

Functionality Cookies are used to enhance the functionality and personalization of this website. These cookies support features like embedded content (such as video or audio), keyword search highlighting, and remembering your preferences across pages—for example, your cookie choices or form inputs during submission.

Some of these cookies are managed by third-party service providers whose features are embedded on our site. These cookies do not store personal information and are necessary for certain site features to work properly.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek