SLAM DUNK: Student Athletes' Wage Suit Against NCAA and Universities Is Dismissed

Analysis

A federal judge in Indiana dismissed yesterday all that remained of a lawsuit filed by student athletes, alleging that they were "employees" and therefore entitled to the minimum wage under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Don Prophete, Jim Goh, and Steve Moore of Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP, represented the NCAA and hundreds of the university defendants.

The suit was initially filed in 2014 by Samantha Sackos, a soccer player for the University of Houston. Ms. Sackos contended that she and other student athletes were temporary employees and should have received the minimum wage. She sought to assert a class action on behalf of all student athletes at NCAA Division I schools. Ms. Sackos eventually dropped out of the case but was replaced by plaintiffs Lauren Anderson, Gillian Berger, and Taylor Hennig, all track and field athletes at the University of Pennsylvania.

The plaintiffs subsequently voluntarily dismissed all of the state-supported schools from the lawsuit on grounds of sovereign immunity, which generally protects governmental entities from lawsuits.

By the time of the court's ruling yesterday, the NCAA and 123 schools remained in the lawsuit. Because all of the three plaintiffs were current or former Penn students, the other schools moved for dismissal, arguing that the plaintiffs had no standing to sue them. U.S. District Court Judge William T. Lawrence agreed, and dismissed the claims without prejudice, which theoretically allows the plaintiffs to try again with amended claims, or by adding plaintiffs from other schools.

That may not be worth the trouble, though, because the judge also dismissed the claims against Penn on their merits – in other words, he specifically found that Penn was not the employer of the plaintiffs. The claims against Penn were dismissed with prejudice, meaning that the plaintiffs can never refile their claims against Penn unless Judge Lawrence's decision is reversed on appeal.

For a printer-friendly copy, click here.

Subscribe for Updates

Related Attorneys

Jump to Page

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When using this website, Constangy and certain third parties may collect and use cookies or similar technologies to enhance your experience. These technologies may collect information about your device, activity on our website, and preferences. Some cookies are essential to site functionality, while others help us analyze performance and usage trends to improve our content and features.

Please note that if you return to this website from a different browser or device, you may need to reselect your cookie preferences.

For more information about our privacy practices, including your rights and choices, please see our Privacy Policy. 

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Strictly Necessary Cookies are essential for the website to function, and cannot be turned off. We use this type of cookie for purposes such as security, network management, and accessibility. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but if you do so, some parts of the site will not work. 

Functionality Cookies

Always Active

Functionality Cookies are used to enhance the functionality and personalization of this website. These cookies support features like embedded content (such as video or audio), keyword search highlighting, and remembering your preferences across pages—for example, your cookie choices or form inputs during submission.

Some of these cookies are managed by third-party service providers whose features are embedded on our site. These cookies do not store personal information and are necessary for certain site features to work properly.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek