In the News: Rachael Rustmann Published in HR Morning on Worker Classification and the Blake Lively Lawsuit

Media Mention
HR Morning

Constangy employment attorney Rachael Rustmann authored an article for HR Morning examining how a threshold worker classification question ended Blake Lively's federal harassment and retaliation claims. 

Rachael highlights that Lively's Title VII claims were dismissed because the court found she was an independent contractor, not an employee. Title VII applies only to employees, and that single distinction meant the court never evaluated the alleged sexual harassment, hostile work environment or retaliation on the set of "It Ends with Us." The determination turned on a multifactor analysis, including Lively's creative control, the specialized and project-based nature of her role and a compensation structure tied to the production rather than a traditional salary. 

The article underscores that worker classification carries consequences well beyond payroll and taxes. HR teams must ensure consistency between contracts, day-to-day management and compensation structures to maintain a defensible classification. Importantly, contractor status does not eliminate all liability the state anti-discrimination and anti-retaliation laws may still apply, and in this case, several of Lively's state law claims survived and ultimately settled. 

"Classification may limit exposure, but that does not mean it eliminates it," Rachael said.

To read the full article on HR Morning's website, click here.

Rachael defends employers in a wide range of employment law matters, with extensive experience handling wage and hour litigation, discrimination, retaliation, and wrongful termination claims. She represents employers in lawsuits and arbitrations nationwide and regularly advises clients on compliance and litigation strategy under the FLSA, Title VII, and other federal and state employment laws. Rachael is known for delivering practical, business-focused guidance tailored to employers’ operational needs and legal risks.

Subscribe for Updates
Jump to Page

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When using this website, Constangy and certain third parties may collect and use cookies or similar technologies to enhance your experience. These technologies may collect information about your device, activity on our website, and preferences. Some cookies are essential to site functionality, while others help us analyze performance and usage trends to improve our content and features.

Please note that if you return to this website from a different browser or device, you may need to reselect your cookie preferences.

For more information about our privacy practices, including your rights and choices, please see our Privacy Policy. 

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Strictly Necessary Cookies are essential for the website to function, and cannot be turned off. We use this type of cookie for purposes such as security, network management, and accessibility. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but if you do so, some parts of the site will not work. 

Functionality Cookies

Always Active

Functionality Cookies are used to enhance the functionality and personalization of this website. These cookies support features like embedded content (such as video or audio), keyword search highlighting, and remembering your preferences across pages—for example, your cookie choices or form inputs during submission.

Some of these cookies are managed by third-party service providers whose features are embedded on our site. These cookies do not store personal information and are necessary for certain site features to work properly.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek
trellis19