In the News: Sasha Thaler and Chris Deubert Publish Article with Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

Media Mention
Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

Constangy attorneys Sasha Thaler and Chris Deubert recently authored an article for Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly discussing three recent decisions by Massachusetts courts that expand protections for workers. 

The first case involved how the Massachusetts Wage Act applies to remote workers and established that the employee involved had the most significant employment relationship with Massachusetts, as that was her sales area, she commuted to the office in Massachusetts and the denial of her commission was done by employees in Massachusetts. The case serves as a reminder to businesses in Massachusetts to ensure that they understand their obligations under the Wage Act. 

The second case, Moore v. Industrial Demolition LLC, involved a plaintiff who had suffered a workplace injury and was unjustly terminated after seeking accommodation for his temporary restrictions due to his medical condition. In this case, the issue was not one of discrimination but rather retaliation for the accommodation request and assertion of one’s rights. Temporary medical conditions can trigger anti-retaliation protections, which is why companies should ensure that all actions comply with company policy and applicable law. 

The third case, City of Newton v. Commonwealth Employment Relations Board, involved a plaintiff who asserted he was transferred to less desirable work hours as retaliation for union involvement. The court ruled that regardless of the collective bargaining agreement being accepted by the company and the officer receiving higher pay, he was placed at a ‘material disadvantage’ with the new schedule he was transitioned to.

Sasha and Chris stressed, “...employers should tread carefully when making changes to terms and conditions of employment after an employee has engaged in legally protected activity – whether union activity, a request for reasonable accommodation, or any other activity protected by applicable law.” 

To view the full article, subscribers may click here.

Subscribe for Updates
Jump to Page

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When using this website, Constangy and certain third parties may collect and use cookies or similar technologies to enhance your experience. These technologies may collect information about your device, activity on our website, and preferences. Some cookies are essential to site functionality, while others help us analyze performance and usage trends to improve our content and features.

Please note that if you return to this website from a different browser or device, you may need to reselect your cookie preferences.

For more information about our privacy practices, including your rights and choices, please see our Privacy Policy. 

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Strictly Necessary Cookies are essential for the website to function, and cannot be turned off. We use this type of cookie for purposes such as security, network management, and accessibility. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but if you do so, some parts of the site will not work. 

Functionality Cookies

Always Active

Functionality Cookies are used to enhance the functionality and personalization of this website. These cookies support features like embedded content (such as video or audio), keyword search highlighting, and remembering your preferences across pages—for example, your cookie choices or form inputs during submission.

Some of these cookies are managed by third-party service providers whose features are embedded on our site. These cookies do not store personal information and are necessary for certain site features to work properly.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek