Overview
Robin has more than 30 years of experience counseling employers and representing them before government agencies and in employment litigation. She advises on a wide range of workplace issues involving federal and state employment laws, including Title VII, the ADEA, ADA, GINA, the Equal Pay Act, and the FMLA.
Robin also conducts internal investigations and delivers training for HR professionals, managers, and employees on topics such as harassment prevention, disability accommodation, and leave management.
Robin is editor in chief of Constangy’s legal publications and plays a leading role in shaping the firm’s voice on employment law developments. She oversees the firm’s legal bulletins and four widely followed law blogs—EEO Compliance Dispatch, California Snapshot, Cyber Advisor, and Employment & Labor Insider. Through her writing and editorial leadership, Robin helps ensure that clients stay informed and prepared for changes in this area of the law.
Robin’s blend of litigation experience, regulatory knowledge, and communication skills makes her a trusted advisor for employers facing complex compliance challenges. She is particularly valued for her practical approach and ability to translate legal issues into clear, actionable guidance.
Robin has a longstanding commitment to community service and maintains an active pro bono practice. She regularly provides legal counsel to nonprofit organizations, including a local food bank and a performing arts organization.
Honors & Recognition
- North Carolina Lawyers Weekly Icon (2024)
- ABA Blawg 100 (2011, 2014-2017)
- The Best Lawyers in America® for Employment Law – Management (2012-2026)
- The Best Lawyers in America®, "Lawyer of the Year" in Employment Law - Management (2022, 2024)
- Business North Carolina, Legal Elite, Employment Law (2023)
- Law360, Employment Editorial Advisory Board (2013-2016)
- Martindale-Hubbell AV Preeminent® Peer Rated for Highest Level of Professional Excellence
- North Carolina Super Lawyers® (2006, 2009-2026)
- Lexology Legal Influencer for Employment (2018)
- JD Supra Readers' Choice Awards "Top Author" (2023-2024)
About Me
Robin has two grown sons, one grandson, and one granddaughter. Robin enjoys reading, walking and swimming, cooking, and all types of music.
Credentials
Education
Wake Forest University
- J.D., cum laude, 1988
- Research editor, Law Review (1987-88)
- Staff member, Law Review (1986-87)
- Recipient, The Law Review Award for Best Student Writing, 1987
- Book award, Constitutional Law II (1986)
- Trusts and Estates (1988)
University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill
- B.A., English, 1977
Media
News
- Media Mention|Law360|In the News: Robin Shea Provides Insight in Law360 on the Recent Green vs. University of Mississippi Race Bias Ruling
- Award|Constangy Attorneys Honored in JD Supra’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Awards
- Award|Five Constangy Attorneys Earn Spots on 2026 North Carolina Super Lawyers List
- Media Mention|Illinois State Bar Association Republishes Robin Shea's Article on At-Will Termination
- Media Mention|HR.com|In the News: HR.com Publishes Robin Shea’s Analysis of Race Discrimination Case Headed to Trial
- Media Mention|HR.com|In the News: Robin Shea Addresses Reasonable Accommodation for HR.com Legal & Compliance Excellence
- Speaking Engagement|Robin Shea Presents Webinar on PTO Compliance and Best Practices
- Media Mention|SHRM|In the News: Robin Shea Quoted in SHRM Article on HR Personal Liability Risks
- Media Mention|SHRM|In the News: Robin Shea Quoted in SHRM Article on ADA Accommodations for Mental Health
- Media Mention|HR.com|In the News: Robin Shea Publishes Article with HR.com
- Award|Constangy Attorneys Recognized in JD Supra’s 2025 Readers’ Choice Awards
- Award|North Carolina Super Lawyers|Six Constangy Attorneys Earn Spots on 2025 North Carolina Super Lawyers List
- Media Mention|SHRM|In the News: Robin Shea Quoted in SHRM Article on Avoiding Common FMLA Violations
- Media Mention|SHRM|In the News: Robin Shea Speaks to SHRM on Reductions in Force and Anti-Discrimination Laws
- Media Mention|SHRM|In the News: Robin Shea Discusses Performance Improvement Plans with SHRM
- Media Mention|HR.com|In the News: FMLA Leave Article Authored by Robin Shea Featured on HR.com
- Media Mention|SHRM|In the News: Robin Shea Discusses Leave Policies on SHRM Podcast
- Media Mention|SHRM|In the News: Robin Shea Speaks to SHRM on Accommodating Employees with Seating Needs
- Media Mention|Legal Dive|In the News: Robin Shea Speaks to Legal Dive on the Implications of a Recent Supreme Court Discrimination Ruling
- Award|North Carolina Lawyers Weekly|Robin Shea Recognized as an “Icon” by North Carolina Lawyers Weekly
- Award|Constangy Partners Recognized for Exceptional Thought Leadership in JD Supra’s 2024 Readers Choice Awards
- Media Mention|Law360|In the News: Robin Shea Publishes Article with Law360 on Dementia in the Workplace
- Award|Six Constangy Attorneys Named North Carolina Super Lawyers for 2024
- Media Mention|Salary.com|In the News: Salary.com Features Robin Shea Article on Handling Employees with Dementia
- Award|Two Constangy Employment Law Articles Among Top Reads on JD Supra in 2023
- Media Mention|Lawyers Weekly|In the News: Cara Crotty and Robin Shea Explore Workplace DEI Policies in Bridge Tower Media Legal Outlets
- Media Mention|SHRM|In The News: Robin Shea Speaks to SHRM on Having Retirement Conversations with Employees
- Media Mention|SHRM|In The News: Robin Shea Discusses Employee Sick Leave Abuse with SHRM
- Media Mention|In The News: Jim Coleman and Robin Shea Speak with SHRM on the EEOC and DOL's New Partnership
- Media Mention|In The News: Robin Shea Quoted on Religious Accommodations in SHRM Article
- Media Mention|Law360 |In the News: Robin Shea Publishes Article with Law360 on Pregnancy Bias
- Speaking Engagement|Constangy Attorneys Present Legal Update to Western North Carolina Human Resource Association
- Media Mention|Law360 |In the News: Robin Shea Publishes Article with Law360
- Award|JD Supra |Will Krasnow and Robin Shea Recognized as Top Authors in 2023 Edition of JD Supra's Readers’ Choice Awards
- Media Mention|HR Dive |In the News: Robin Shea Quoted by HR Dive on Remote Work
- Award|Seven Constangy Attorneys Named North Carolina Super Lawyers for 2023
- Award|Business North Carolina |Five Constangy Attorneys Named in 2023 Edition of Business North Carolina’s “Legal Elite” and “Hall of Fame”
- Media Mention|Workflow|In the News: Robin Shea Authors Article on the Use of AI in Hiring Decisions
- Speaking Engagement|Constangy Attorneys Present at Alamance County HRA Seminar
- Award|60 Constangy Attorneys Named in 2023 Best Lawyers in America Rankings; 15 Named as Ones to Watch
- Media Mention|Law360|In the News: 6th Circ. Ruling Guides On Settlements With Older Workers
- Award|Seven Constangy Attorneys Named to North Carolina Super Lawyers
- Award|51 Constangy Attorneys Named in 2022 Best Lawyers in America Rankings; 13 Named as “Ones to Watch”
- Award|Seven Constangy Attorneys Named to North Carolina Super Lawyers
- Award|50 Constangy Attorneys Named in 2021 Best Lawyers in America Rankings; 9 Associates Named as “Ones to Watch”
- Award|12 Constangy Attorneys Named to North Carolina Super Lawyers
- Media Mention|HR Dive|In the News: After sexually harassing an employee, a manager punished her, then fired her
- Award|44 Constangy Attorneys Named in 2020 Best Lawyers in America Rankings
- Media Mention|BenefitsPRO|In the News: What to know about the EEOC's latest proposed regulations
- Media Mention|HR Dive|In the News: Rumor About Sleeping with the Boss can be Sex Discrimination, 4th Cir. Says
- Award|11 Constangy Attorneys Named to North Carolina Super Lawyers
- Media Mention|SHRM Online|In the News: Do your employees have the flu?
- Media Mention|HR Dive|In the News: Despite finding no discrimination, court holds USPS liable for retaliation
- Award|47 Constangy Attorneys Named to 2019 Best Lawyers List
- Media Mention|Business Management Daily|In the News: Ride out the Summer Slide
- Award|10 Constangy Attorneys Named to North Carolina Super Lawyers
- Award|49 Constangy Attorneys Named as Best Lawyers in America
- Award|Ten Constangy Attorneys Named to North Carolina Super Lawyers
Events
- Event|Embassy Suites By Hilton Greensboro-Airport|2025 Triad Labor & Employment Workshop
- Seminar|The Conference Center at GTCC|Winston Salem 2023 Labor & Employment Workshop
- Webinar|What Employers Need to Know about AI Bias
- Webinar|What employers need to know about the COVID-19 vaccines and reasonable accommodation
- Webinar|Webinar|The Best-Ever Year-End Employment Law Review that Five Employment Law Bloggers Have Ever Presented
- Seminar|The Milton Rhodes Center for the Arts|Winston-Salem Breakfast Briefing: How to conduct a bang-up workplace investigation
- Webinar|Webinar|Accommodate this? Medical marijuana and state disability laws
Legal Analysis
- Blog Post|Repo employer: 8 steps to getting your property back from an ex-employee
- Blog Post|BREAKING: DOL issues independent contractor regs, NLRB restores joint employment regs
- Blog Post|Second-guessing the advice columns: Customer and co-worker harassment
- Blog Post|Bad luck for this employer with separation agreement
- Blog Post|An employer's harassment to-do list for our times
- Blog Post|Fishy promotion leads to trial on age, reverse race claims
- Blog Post|A loser of an ADA argument
- Blog Post|BREAKING: EEOC votes to revoke Biden-era harassment guidance (updated)
- Blog Post|4 employment law shorts for the long weekend
- Blog Post|Big Deal? EEOC seeks to rescind Biden-era harassment guidance
- Blog Post|Five losing arguments: Race bias case will go to trial.
- Blog Post|Five employment law fumbles by U-M's Sherrone Moore
- Blog Post|FMLA decision has four gems for employers
- Blog Post|ADA-FMLA Hell: 4 things this employer (allegedly) did wrong
- Blog Post|An employer's easy guide to reasonable accommodation
- Blog Post|Veterans Day 2025
- Blog Post|Can a member of a metal band be fired at will?
- Blog Post|Can a falsely-accused sexual harasser sue for defamation?
- Blog Post|EEOC gets a quorum, and more
- Blog Post|Employers, what's your motivation?
- Blog Post|Lactation decision has employer nursing its wounds
- Blog Post|The key to retaliation claims: Timing, timing, timing!
- Blog Post|9.11.25
- Blog Post|Employee quits but tries to take it back: Can she do that?
- Blog Post|Workplace fraternization policies: Four "whos" and a "why"
- Blog Post|Employers, can team-building get you sued? Four risks, four solutions
- Blog Post|Employer skirts constructive discharge claim
- Blog Post|Christian teacher gets jury trial in name, pronoun case
- Blog Post|Well, duh! Pregnant Workers Fairness Act applies to lactation, judge rules
- Blog Post|Mandatory referral to EAP may be "adverse action," court says
- Blog Post|“If we do it for you, we’ll have to do it for everybody”: 4 worst practices for employers
- Blog Post|Happy Fourth of July!
- Blog Post|SCOTUS wraps it up: Four lessons for employers
- Blog Post|Social media tip for employers: SHUT UP!
- Blog Post|The story of Juneteenth
- Blog Post|Dads-in-the-21st-century workplace quiz!
- Blog Post|Penni Bradshaw
- Blog Post|AI job interviews: What we have to "look forward" to
- Blog Post|Court scraps EEOC guidance on pronouns, restrooms, and dress
- Blog Post|EEOC may have a quorum soon: 4 things employers can expect
- Blog Post|AI hallucinations cause bad trip for lawyers
- Blog Post|Has Trump's EO killed disparate impact claims?
- Blog Post|Trump fired an EEOC Commissioner. You won't BELIEVE what happened next!
- Blog Post|Accommodation may be required even if “essential functions” can be performed without
- Blog Post|7 tips for employers about DEI programs
- Blog Post|FMLA brain teaser!
- Blog Post|EEOC signals crackdown on anti-Jewish bias
- Blog Post|Judge nixes termination of NLRB member
- Blog Post|EEOC backtracks on transgender, pregnancy; full speed ahead against “anti-American” bias
- Blog Post|Labor & employment in Week 4 of Trump 2: No love lost.
- Blog Post|Labor & employment in Week 3 of Trump 2: The Empire Strikes Back
- Blog Post|Labor & employment in Week 2 of Trump 2: Can he do that?
- Blog Post|Labor & employment in Week 1 of Trump 2
- Blog Post|The Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
- Blog Post|Robin's quickie guide to motions to dismiss, summary judgment, and trial
- Blog Post|7 strikes, and this employer is OUT!
- Blog Post|Foolish CEO quips, fishy termination mean pregnancy case will go to trial
- Blog Post|3 things that will make an employer's case go down to defeat
- Blog Post|A note from Santa about workplace holiday parties
- Blog Post|"Tighty whitey" case has 4 good lessons about workplace retaliation
- Blog Post|ACLU, others back EEOC in challenge to Enforcement Guidance on harassment
- Blog Post|Five areas of employment law (at least) may be affected by Trump's second act.
- Blog Post|The termination wasn't perfect, but this employer nailed the retaliation case.
- Blog Post|You be the judge: Does this ADA plaintiff have a case?
- Blog Post|Don't want an EEOC pregnancy lawsuit? Then DON'T do these 4 things.
- Blog Post|FMLA leave: 5 things this employer (allegedly) did wrong
- Blog Post|FMLA abuse: 5 things this employer did right
- Blog Post|Miss Mannerly's five tips for political peace in the workplace
- Blog Post|September 11, 2024
- Blog Post|Workplace drug/alcohol policies in a legal weed world: 10 easy steps
- Blog Post|Labor Day 2024
- Blog Post|Drugs and alcohol in the workplace: Five fun facts
- Blog Post|Don't use AI to get around the ADA!
- Blog Post|Reasonable accommodation and the ADA: Top 8 rules for employers
- Blog Post|Hiring discrimination claims: 5 ways to stay out of hot water
- Blog Post|Ouch! Four tips on email mishaps in the workplace
- Blog Post|Employers, don't get tripped up in this "GINA" trap
- Blog Post|Texas challenge to EEOC harassment guidance ends -- for now.
- Blog Post|The man who said "no" to DEI training, and four lessons for employers
- Blog Post|Fourth of July 2024
- Blog Post|10 social media tips for employers and employees
- Blog Post|Pregnancy regs take effect, results of court challenges are mixed
- Blog Post|Juneteenth 2024
- Blog Post|Father's Day 2024
- Blog Post|ADA challenge to wellness incentives stays alive
- Blog Post|EEOC lowers the boom on EEO-1s
- Blog Post|Memorial Day 2024
- Blog Post|Randy Loftis
- Blog Post|Law firm faces trial on HR manager’s pregnancy claims
- Blog Post|Challenges to EEOC regs keep on coming
- Blog Post|Mother's Day "pregnancy" quiz!
- Blog Post|EEOC Guidance on workplace harassment: What employers need to know
- Blog Post|Everything you wanted to know about the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act*
- Analysis|Everything you wanted to know about Pregnant Workers Fairness Act*
- Blog Post|Happy Passover!
- Blog Post|“Significant harm” not needed for discriminatory transfer claim, SCOTUS says
- Analysis|“Significant harm” not required for discriminatory transfer claim, SCOTUS says
- Blog Post|Reverse gender identity discrimination? Yes, it's a thing.
- Blog Post|Eclipses and the workplace quiz!
- Blog Post|DEI Quiz!
- Blog Post|Is the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act an invalid law?
- Analysis|Woo-hoo! 2023 EEO-1 data collection will start April 30!
- Blog Post|When employers are sorry
- Blog Post|Preferred pronouns and the aging workforce
- Blog Post|Accommodating cannabis: A "how-to" for employers
- Blog Post|In case you missed it . . .
- Blog Post|Want to fire your employee for FMLA fraud?
- Blog Post|The Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
- Blog Post|Your employee has dementia: what to do?
- Blog Post|Bah! Humbug! An employment law Christmas Carol
- Blog Post|Va. Supreme Court lets teacher's "pronoun" lawsuit go forward
- Blog Post|I'm an employment lawyer. Here are 5 things you employers are doing wrong.
- Blog Post|Hanukkah blessings.
- Blog Post|Justice Sandra Day O'Connor: March 26, 1930-December 1, 2023
- Blog Post|Happy Thanksgiving 2023!
- Blog Post|5 things that could get you accused of sex harassment
- Blog Post|Thank you, veterans!
- Blog Post|You asked for it, Kathy Griffin.
- Blog Post|"Quiet firing": A bad idea
- Blog Post|When it comes to HR, don't quit your day job, Miss Manners.
- Blog Post|What's in that new EEOC guidance on workplace harassment?
- Blog Post|EEOC's "not-so-sweet six" priorities, for 2024 and beyond
- Blog Post|Michigan courts adopt pronoun rule
- Blog Post|Reasonable accommodation for driving to the office? Are you kidding?
- Blog Post|September 11, 2023
- Blog Post|Labor law roundup
- Blog Post|Want employees back in the office?
- Blog Post|Respect your elders.
- Blog Post|EEOC issues proposed regs on Pregnant Workers Fairness Act
- Blog Post|Harassment accuser's raps can be used against her, court rules
- Analysis|EEOC issues proposed regs on Pregnant Workers Fairness Act
- Analysis|As expected, SCOTUS makes it tougher for employers to refuse religious accommodations
- Blog Post|July Fourth, 2023
- Blog Post|Celebrate freedom!
- Blog Post|Father's Day 2023
- Blog Post|Memorial Day 2023
- Blog Post|DOL issues guidance on PUMP for Nursing Mothers Act
- Blog Post|Rule 1 in beating an age claim: Get your story straight.
- Blog Post|EEOC updates COVID-19 guidance
- Blog Post|Pregnant Workers Fairness Act Quiz!
- Blog Post|Second-guessing the advice columns: Is this pregnancy discrimination?
- Blog Post|Employment law and Aesop
- Blog Post|Religious accommodation at the Supreme Court
- Blog Post|I got fired at age 60. Must have been my age.
- Blog Post|3 strikes, and this employer is OUT!
- Blog Post|Employees who self-destruct
- Blog Post|Your settlement's no good here.
- Blog Post|When it comes to harassment complaints, GO DIRECTLY TO HR.
- Blog Post|Stupid plaintiff tricks: Faking emails to win
- Blog Post|That well-endowed Canadian teacher -- what would've happened here?
- Blog Post|What will that NLRB decision do to separation agreements?
- Blog Post|Where do the presidents rank on employment law?
- Blog Post|How to handle wage-hour issues with remote workers
- Blog Post|Request for "FMLA leave" is protected activity, court says
- Blog Post|Will ChatGPT make white-collar workers obsolete?
- Blog Post|SCOTUS will review religious accommodation standard
- Blog Post|What does Prince Harry have to do with employment law?
- Blog Post|Welcome to Constangy's new Cyber Team!
- Blog Post|The Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
- Blog Post|Would you have fired these hotheads?
- Blog Post|Moms rule in Omnibus Spending Bill
- Blog Post|Happy holidays!
- Blog Post|2 cents on Speak Out, Respect Marriage acts
- Blog Post|Workplace holiday party quiz -- Version 2022!
- Blog Post|New hipness in employment law
- Blog Post|Is faxing a reasonable accommodation?
- Blog Post|Happy Thanksgiving 2022!
- Blog Post|Suit based on notice of intermittent FMLA absences will go to trial
- Blog Post|Janet Dhillon leaving EEOC
- Blog Post|Happy Veterans' Day 2022!
- Blog Post|Election roundup for employers
- Blog Post|EEOC's proposed Strategic Plan seems heavy on litigation, light on mediation
- Blog Post|"We can't accommodate spitting"
- Blog Post|Should "sorry" be banned from the workplace?
- Blog Post|Proving reverse bias: Tough, but not impossible
- Blog Post|EEOC issues new poster!
- Blog Post|Bostock settles LGBT bias lawsuit
- Blog Post|How not to prove "welcomeness" in a sex harassment case
- Blog Post|Workplace emoji DON'Ts
- Blog Post|Is Biden about to make marijuana legal?
- Blog Post|Judge shuts down LGBT guidance
- Blog Post|Best brief ever!*
- Blog Post|Employer seeking "Kens and Barbies" must face trial on bias claims
- Blog Post|The $3,000 tip: Is the employer stuck?
- Blog Post|ABCs of Employment Law: Employment at will
- Blog Post|9-11-22
- Blog Post|Queen Elizabeth, 1926-2022
- Blog Post|Labor Day Quiz (pro version)
- Blog Post|Is more EEOC litigation on the way?
- Blog Post|Gender dysphoria is covered by ADA, appeals court says
- Blog Post|Nasty language may be protected concerted activity, court says
- Blog Post|Second-guessing the advice columns: Workplace bathrooms!
- Blog Post|This 'n' that in employment law
- Blog Post|Lawyer faces discipline over sexist slur
- Blog Post|EEOC update to COVID guidance is ho-hum
- Blog Post|ABCs of Employment Law: The Fair Labor Standards Act (overtime)
- Blog Post|An OWBPA kick in the pants
- Blog Post|ABCs of Employment Law: The Fair Labor Standards Act (minimum wage)
- Blog Post|Happy Fourth, y'all!
- Blog Post|Happy Freedom Day!
- Blog Post|Happy Father's Day!
- Blog Post|FMLA "interference" doesn't require denial of leave
- Blog Post|Memorial Day 2022
- Blog Post|Court gets the joke: Twitter "threat" didn't violate NLRA
- Blog Post|EEOC issues guidance on use of AI in hiring
- Blog Post|"Bald" insult is sexual harassment, UK tribunal says
- Blog Post|Happy Mother's Day weekend!
- Blog Post|ABCs of Employment Law: Retaliation
- Blog Post|Weed policy options for multi-state employers -- are there any?
- Blog Post|The $450,000 workplace birthday party
- Blog Post|ABCs of employment law: Religious accommodation
- Blog Post|It's time to submit your EEO-1 data!
- Blog Post|Ketanji Brown Jackson is confirmed to SCOTUS
- Blog Post|Employers, get ready for a "bumpy night"
- Blog Post|ABCs of employment law: Discrimination
- Blog Post|EEOC issues new guidance on caregiver bias
- Blog Post|Peeping is harassment, even if “peep-ee” doesn't see it going on, court says
- Blog Post|Nonbinary info to be added to EEO-1 reports?
- Blog Post|Second guessing the advice columns: Workplace follies
- Blog Post|Biden signs #MeToo arbitration limit into law
- Blog Post|Biden has a nominee for Breyer's SCOTUS seat
- Blog Post|Artificial Intelligence in HR: A blessing and a curse
- Blog Post|Don't miss our webinar on AI bias with EEOC's Keith Sonderling
- Blog Post|#MeToo arbitration bill passes Senate
- Analysis|#MeToo arbitration bill passes Senate, Biden expected to sign
- Blog Post|Biden's Supreme Court nominee -- who will she be?
- Analysis|What’s next for OSHA and COVID vaccine mandates?
- Blog Post|OSHA withdraws vaccine ETS, but there may be more to come
- Blog Post|The Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
- Blog Post|More on the SCOTUS "vax-or-test" decision
- Analysis|Yesterday’s SCOTUS “vax-or-test” decision
- Blog Post|Supreme Court lets health care vaccine mandate go forward nationwide
- Blog Post|BREAKING: Supreme Court puts kibosh on OSHA ETS
- Blog Post|Highlights from the OSHA vaccine ETS argument at the Supreme Court
- Blog Post|Today's the day!
- Analysis|SCOTUS to hear arguments on OSHA, health care vax mandates Jan. 7
- Blog Post|SCOTUS to hear arguments on OSHA, health care vax mandates Jan. 7
- Blog Post|SCOTUS orders government to respond to ETS challenges
- Analysis|The stay is lifted: Divided court upholds OSHA vaccine ETS
- Blog Post|BREAKING: OSHA vaccine ETS is upheld by court
- Blog Post|Federal vaccine mandates: Where employers stand now
- Blog Post|Yes, Virginia, COVID-19 can be a disability
- Blog Post|Vax mandate FAQs!
- Analysis|Constangy FYI|On vaccine ETS, OSHA stands down, Sixth Circuit wins lottery
- Blog Post|On vaccine ETS, OSHA stands down, Sixth Circuit wins lottery
- Blog Post|Court keeps OSHA's vaccine mandate on hold. What now?
- Analysis|Constangy FYI|OSHA's vaccine ETS is stayed by court
- Blog Post|OSHA's vaccine ETS is stayed by court
- Blog Post|OSHA's vaccine ETS: First impressions
- Blog Post|EEOC issues guidance on vaccine religious accommodations
- Blog Post|Asking applicants for vax status? Not so fast, employers.
- Blog Post|Some questions about the coming vaxx mandate
- Blog Post|9.11.01
- Blog Post|Vaccination accommodation: Is that religious request sincere?
- Blog Post|Non-compete traps, Part One
- Blog Post|Gov. Cuomo: A cautionary tale for employers
- Blog Post|Harassment prevention tweaks for our weird times
- Blog Post|This 'n' that in labor and employment law
- Blog Post|The bathroom wars resume
- Blog Post|Immigration law: Demystified!
- Blog Post|A few grains of salt about that COVID vaccine decision from Texas
- Blog Post|Summer fun quiz for employers!
- Blog Post|CFAA conviction requires some kind of a "hack," Supreme Court says
- Blog Post|Everything employers always wanted to know about COVID vaccines ...
- Analysis|Everything employers always wanted to know about vaccines . . . and have been asking about for months.
- Blog Post|BREAKING: EEOC issues guidance on COVID vaccine incentives for employees
- Analysis|Constangy FYI|BREAKING: EEOC issues guidance on COVID vaccine incentives for employees
- Blog Post|Memorial Day 2021
- Blog Post|The insidious deception that is "employment at will"
- Blog Post|No-mask vax FAQs
- Blog Post|Second-guessing the advice columns: After-hours texts from the boss
- Blog Post|"Sharpen your FOCUS" on diversity, equity, inclusion
- Blog Post|Mother's Day Quiz! (2021 version)
- Blog Post|Federal paid leave laws may be on the way
- Analysis|Biden establishes task force to “promote worker power”
- Blog Post|EEO-1 "Component 1" data collection has begun!
- Blog Post|Publicity: The not-so-hidden cost of a lawsuit
- Blog Post|What the post-COVID office will be wearing this year.
- Blog Post|Goodbye, Susan.
- Blog Post|EEOC to issue guidance on vaccine incentives
- Blog Post|Employer, audit thyself!
- Blog Post|Employer gets whacked on workers' comp, FMLA overlap
- Blog Post|Calling all teleworkers: Back to the office!
- Blog Post|EEO-1 data collection to run April 26-July 19
- Blog Post|FAQs about the gender pay gap
- Analysis|Senate confirms Marty Walsh as Secretary of Labor
- Blog Post|Senate confirms Marty Walsh as Secretary of Labor
- Blog Post|"Sweet Six" ways an employer can win at the EEOC
- Blog Post|Have you had your Work & Play? (vaxx edition)
- Blog Post|"Notorious Nine" mistakes by employers in dealing with the EEOC
- Blog Post|Biden Time: "Divisive" training ok, OSHA "not protective," independent contractor regs paused
- Blog Post|COVID quiz 2021!
- Blog Post|Second-guessing the advice columns: "Cancel culture" and the workplace
- Blog Post|Biden Time: Union attorney nominated for NLRB post, EEOC wellness regs are "frozen"
- Blog Post|Biden Time: DOL nominee Walsh advances to Senate vote
- Blog Post|Employer-mandated COVID vaccines: Five reservations
- Blog Post|Biden Time: NLRB guidance rescinded, wage-hour regs on hold?, Marty Walsh moves up
- Blog Post|Biden Time: Not much for employers to cheer about
- Blog Post|Biden Time: Busy first week!
- Blog Post|Les employes se rebellant aux colliers anti-COVID
- Blog Post|What's in those proposed wellness regs?
- Blog Post|Now, this IS a bit of good news.
- Blog Post|EEO-1 data collection is back on!
- Blog Post|See you in 2021!
- Blog Post|No FFCRA in 2021
- Blog Post|How the COVID stole Christmas!
- Blog Post|What employers can expect from the Biden Administration, Part 2
- Analysis|What employers can expect from the Biden Administration
- Blog Post|Have you had your Work & Play?
- Analysis|EEOC issues guidance on COVID vaccines
- Blog Post|BREAKING: EEOC issues guidance on COVID vaccines
- Blog Post|What employers can expect from the Biden Administration
- Blog Post|Employee "refuses to sign." Now what?
- Blog Post|Nail-biting time for the FFCRA?
- Blog Post|They may regret this decision.
- Blog Post|Happy Hanukkah!
- Blog Post|EEOC settles "transgender funeral director" case
- Blog Post|Have you had your Work & Play?
- Blog Post|10 things for which this employment lawyer is thankful -- COVID edition
- Blog Post|EEOC issues proposed updates on religious bias
- Blog Post|Can employer mandate COVID-19 vaccinations?
- Blog Post|Will Bernie Sanders be our next Secretary of Labor?
- Blog Post|Jeffrey Toobin fired for "DIY" incident
- Blog Post|Thank you, veterans!
- Blog Post|Duty calls.
- Blog Post|5 things your lawyer likes to see in an HR person
- Blog Post|The Work & Play's the thing.
- Blog Post|Amy Coney Barrett is confirmed and sworn in
- Blog Post|Employment & Labor Insider is 10 years old!
- Blog Post|Is COVID making employees crazy?
- Blog Post|Judge Barrett set for confirmation vote next Thursday
- Blog Post|Best Presidential debate idea ever!
- Blog Post|Ho. Ly. Cow.
- Blog Post|FFCRA "School Daze" quiz!
- Blog Post|Amy Coney Barrett and Barbara Lagoa, and a couple of crazy lawsuits
- Blog Post|This "phishing" test stinks. From the head down.
- Blog Post|Woo-hoo! We have a full EEOC!
- Blog Post|Come out to Work & Play!
- Blog Post|Rest in peace, Justice Ginsburg
- Blog Post|Revised FFCRA regulations took effect Wednesday
- Blog Post|Political activism, COVID-19, and labor law
- Analysis|Revised FFCRA regulations to take effect on Wednesday
- Blog Post|September 11, 2001
- Blog Post|More on coronavirus from the EEOC
- Blog Post|Have you had your Work & Play?
- Blog Post|Revised FFCRA regs are coming!
- Blog Post|Labor Day mini-quiz!
- Blog Post|More Q&A on the FFCRA
- Blog Post|Life in 2020
- Blog Post|Court revives Mr. Bostock's sexual orientation lawsuit
- Blog Post|Stop goofing off, teleworkers!
- Blog Post|EEOC's opioid guidance works for all legal drugs*
- Blog Post|Discrimination lawsuits are back, baby!
- Analysis|Federal court vacates part of DOL’s regs interpreting FFCRA
- Blog Post|Employers, what do you prefer?
- Blog Post|Happy 30th anniversary to the ADA
- Blog Post|More FFCRA FAQs from the DOL!
- Blog Post|Videoconferencing apps and litigation: Employers, be careful!
- Blog Post|Sexual orientation and gender identity in the workplace quiz!
- Analysis|Gov. Cooper signs bill limiting business liability for COVID-19 claims
- Blog Post|SCOTUS denies cert in Equal Pay Act salary history case
- Blog Post|Happy Fourth of July!
- Blog Post|More on FFCRA leave for kids' summer closings
- Blog Post|Social media PSA for employees and employers
- Blog Post|Employers can't test for COVID-19 antibodies, EEOC says
- Blog Post|Miss Mannerly answers employers' Summer 2020 etiquette questions!
- Blog Post|Title VII applies to bias based on LGBT status, Supreme Court says
- Analysis|Title VII applies to discrimination based on LGBT status, Supreme Court says
- Blog Post|EEOC issues update on coronavirus and discrimination laws
- Blog Post|Court dismisses EEO-1 comp reporting appeal
- Blog Post|Nominees for EEOC, NLRB advance to full Senate vote
- Blog Post|Just in time for summer: More answers about the FFCRA
- Blog Post|How to ask employees about their legal meds without being sued
- Blog Post|Is COVID-19 fakery a federal crime?
- Blog Post|Gov. DeSantis and Rebekah Jones' criminal background info
- Blog Post|Second-guessing the advice columns: Small-employer exemption to FFCRA
- Blog Post|Plaintiff in landmark Title VII transgender-rights case dies
- Blog Post|Happy Mother's Day.
- Blog Post|Oh, so THAT'S what you meant!
- Blog Post|Employers get reprieve on EEO-1 reporting
- Blog Post|COVID-19 return to work quiz!
- Blog Post|Employers can test for coronavirus, EEOC says
- Blog Post|Unemployment alphabet soup: Here's what it means
- Blog Post|Smile when you say that!
- Blog Post|COVID-19 and "regular" discrimination
- Blog Post|What's in those regulations about COVID-19 leave?
- Analysis|DOL issues regulations interpreting expanded FMLA and paid sick leave laws
- Analysis|IRS provides guidance to employers on coronavirus tax credits, and announces employee retention credit
- Analysis|Weekend update: DOL answers more of our FFCRA questions
- Blog Post|What we still don't know about the expanded FMLA and paid sick leave laws
- Blog Post|That 30-day DOL non-enforcement period? More like 14 days.
- Analysis|That 30-day DOL non-enforcement period? More like 14 days.
- Blog Post|Your Families First Coronavirus Response Act questions answered!
- Analysis|Your Families First Coronavirus Response Act questions answered! (Some of them, anyway)
- Analysis|Good news from the government about Families First Coronavirus Response Act
- Analysis|President Trump signs family and medical leave expansion, paid leave into law
- Blog Post|Trump signs FML expansion, paid leave into law
- Analysis|Paid leave for coronavirus-related reasons passes House and has bipartisan support
- Blog Post|Paid leave for coronavirus-related reasons passes House and has bipartisan support
- Blog Post|Alcohol in the workplace *hic* quiz!
- Blog Post|Trump nominates 3 to EEOC, 2 to NLRB
- Blog Post|Dems' workplace pregnancy horror stories: What we can learn
- Blog Post|Bloomberg is right about NDAs
- Blog Post|Dr. Loveless answers your workplace romance questions!
- Blog Post|EEO-1 comp data collection is officially ovah!
- Blog Post|EEOC's new priorities, plus FY19 stats
- Blog Post|Victoria Lipnic won't seek third term on EEOC
- Blog Post|"I have a dream"
- Blog Post|Drug testing in the '20s: What employers should and shouldn't do
- Blog Post|New Year's resolutions for employers
- Blog Post|Second-guessing the advice columns: The morning after the workplace party
- Blog Post|This week in employment law: Island of the Misfits
- Blog Post|See you in 2020!
- Blog Post|Employee termination quiz!
- Blog Post|Workplace holiday party central!
- Blog Post|NLRB extends time for comments on election proposal
- Blog Post|Small world.
- Blog Post|10 things for which this employment lawyer is thankful in 2019
- Blog Post|"OK Boomer" -- harmless, or harassment?
- Blog Post|EEOC urges NLRB to let employers prevent, punish harassment
- Blog Post|An employer's deposition disaster
- Blog Post|EEO-1 pay data complete?
- Blog Post|Is gender dysphoria an ADA-protected disability?
- Blog Post|EEO-1 pay data collection is "complete"
- Blog Post|Thoughts about the Supreme Court LGBT arguments
- Blog Post|Second-guessing the advice columns: Get off my lawn!
- Blog Post|EEOC to accept comp data past reporting deadline
- Blog Post|Eugene Scalia confirmed as Secretary of Labor
- Blog Post|Those new overtime regs? Here they are.
- Blog Post|BREAKING: Final OT rule on the way -- will take effect 1/1/20
- Blog Post|10 things your employment lawyer never wants to hear
- Blog Post|Scalia confirmation hearing: A show about nothing
- Blog Post|No more EEO-1 comp data, EEOC proposes
- Blog Post|"Stud-shaming" may be sex harassment, court says
- Blog Post|9.11.01
- Blog Post|In retaliation cases, timing is everything.
- Blog Post|A feel-good story about social media!
- Blog Post|Politics and the workplace don't mix.
- Blog Post|Why transgender bias isn't "sex discrimination"
- Blog Post|An employer between a rock and a hard place
- Blog Post|Will the EEOC change its tune on LGBT rights?
- Blog Post|Hone your firing skills!
- Blog Post|EEOC takes a hit in criminal background case
- Blog Post|People are weird.
- Blog Post|Sharon Fast Gustafson sworn in
- Blog Post|Reference info comes back to bite ex-employer
- Blog Post|Senate confirms EEOC General Counsel
- Blog Post|Uh-oh. A new gender pay gap!
- Blog Post|Ten ways employers get themselves sued (Part Two)
- Blog Post|My preemptive strike for Eugene Scalia
- Blog Post|Ten ways employers get themselves sued (Part One)
- Blog Post|Justice Stevens and employment law
- Blog Post|Eugene Scalia to be Trump's nominee for Labor
- Blog Post|EEOC portal for comp data is now open!
- Blog Post|Email etiquette can prevent, and help you defend, lawsuits
- Blog Post|Supreme Court to hear LGBT cases on October 8
- Blog Post|"This week (or thereabouts) in employment law" quiz
- Blog Post|Get answers to your EEO-1 comp data questions!
- Blog Post|"Sexual harassment" in the nature of the business
- Blog Post|EEOC ready to accept comp data on July 15
- Blog Post|Miss Mannerly answers your summer HR questions
- Blog Post|"Dads in the workplace" quiz!
- Blog Post|Another court says obesity is not a "disability"
- Blog Post|Update on EEO-1 comp data reporting
- Blog Post|Can Title VII plaintiffs bypass the EEOC?
- Blog Post|Do heterosexuals have Title VII rights? The exciting conclusion!
- Blog Post|This is evidence of age discrimination?
- Blog Post|Sex addiction is no defense to bathroom "DIY"
- Blog Post|Equal pay "certification": A terrible idea
- Blog Post|Memorial Day 2019
- Blog Post|Memorial Day employment law quiz!
- Blog Post|What's on the spring 2019 regulatory agenda?
- Blog Post|NLRB releases advice memos on gig workers, inflatable critters, and more
- Blog Post|People come and go so quickly here!
- Blog Post|"Moms in the Workplace" quiz!
- Blog Post|Janet Dhillon confirmed as EEOC Chair
- Blog Post|The EEO-1 compensation data appeal: What we know now
- Blog Post|EEOC nominee Dhillon is up for confirmation vote next week!
- Blog Post|EEOC to require 2018 and 2017 comp data by Sept. 30 (UPDATED)
- Blog Post|Do heterosexuals have Title VII rights? Part Two.
- Blog Post|Help wanted - "Preferably Caucasian"?
- Blog Post|EEOC posts notification on EEO-1 comp data
- Blog Post|What you need to know about the Supreme Court LGBT cases
- Blog Post|"God's plan" goes awry
- Blog Post|EEO-1 comp data is due Sept. 30 (UPDATED)
- Blog Post|Welcome to the California Snapshot!
- Blog Post|Have a happy . . .
- Blog Post|Part four of the EEO-1 comp data saga
- Blog Post|"Fat shaming" costs employer big bucks
- Blog Post|Very interesting! EEOC releases official FY2018 charge stats
- Analysis|NJ ban on nondisclosure agreements: What does it mean for employers?
- Blog Post|Cheryl Stanton confirmed as head of U.S. Wage Hour Division
- Blog Post|Your customers may be driving your employees to drink
- Blog Post|My greatest Equal Pay idea ever!
- Analysis|EEOC proposes deadline of 9/30 for employers to submit EEO-1 compensation data
- Blog Post|BREAKING: Deadline of 9/30 proposed for EEO-1 comp data
- Blog Post|Do arbitration agreements have to comply with the OWBPA?
- Blog Post|Happy Friday, Michiganders!
- Blog Post|Comments on OT regs will be accepted until May 21
- Blog Post|When monitoring employees' computer activity, don't overreach.
- Blog Post|Horribly sexist, or fantastic HR?
- Blog Post|Chapter Two in the EEO-1 pay survey flap
- Blog Post|"This week in employment law" quiz!
- Blog Post|"Equal pay" quiz!
- Blog Post|BREAKING: Proposed overtime regs are out!
- Blog Post|A clarification on those proposed EEOC regulations
- Blog Post|"Masterpiece Cakeshop Two" is over
- Blog Post|BREAKING: EEO-1 pay data collection is back on
- Blog Post|"HR basics" quiz!
- Blog Post|Finally! Trump's workplace nominees make it out of committee
- Blog Post|BREAKING: Supreme Court vacates Ninth Circuit Equal Pay Act decision
- Blog Post|Proposed EEOC regs a mere formality? Don't be too sure.
- Blog Post|Another caution for employers in medical marijuana states
- Blog Post|"She slept her way to the top!" = sexual harassment
- Blog Post|Uh-oh. Michigan AG to review Paid Medical Leave Act politicking.
- Blog Post|Dr. Loveless is back for Valentine's Day 2019!
- Blog Post|LGBT rights under Title VII: Another court weighs in
- Blog Post|Will we get a federal paid leave law this year?
- Blog Post|Deadline for filing EEO-1 workforce data extended thru May 31
- Blog Post|Six legal traps for "red state" employers
- Blog Post|EEOC portal is back up and running
- Blog Post|No "disparate impact" claim for older applicants, court says
- Blog Post|In light of recent events
- Blog Post|Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
- Blog Post|SCOTUS to hear case on Title VII "exhaustion"
- Blog Post|FAQs about Michigan's new Paid Medical Leave Act
- Blog Post|Trump renominates for workplace agencies
- Blog Post|Do heterosexuals have Title VII rights?
- Blog Post|BREAKING: New overtime regulations are on the way!
- Blog Post|Christian baker's lawsuit against Colorado can proceed, court says
- Blog Post|Year-end employment law roundup
- Blog Post|Has morale improved yet?
- Blog Post|BREAKING: Trump nominee for EEOC withdraws from consideration
- Blog Post|See you next year!
- Blog Post|Workplace Christmas quiz!
- Blog Post|EEOC rescinds wellness incentive rules
- Blog Post|Executive recruiter not liable for hiring bias, court says
- Blog Post|SCOTUS to revisit standard for reviewing agency interpretations
- Blog Post|Second-guessing the advice columns: Holiday party harasser
- Blog Post|Avoid women at all costs?
- Blog Post|ConstangyTV is on the air!
- Blog Post|BREAKING: Supreme Court WON'T consider taking up LGBT cases this Friday.
- Blog Post|George Herbert Walker Bush
- Blog Post|6 easy ways to keep your workplace holiday party -- without a lawsuit.
- Blog Post|The best-ever year-end employment law review that 5 employment law bloggers have ever presented!!!!
- Blog Post|Supreme Court-LGBT update
- Blog Post|10 things for which this employment lawyer is thankful in 2018
- Blog Post|Wiccans, pagans now outnumber Presbyterians, study says
- Blog Post|Refusal to accommodate, retaliation, or both?
- Blog Post|Harassment interviews conducted by AI?
- Blog Post|Thank you, veterans.
- Analysis|Supreme Court will soon decide whether to take up LGBT rights cases
- Blog Post|Supreme Court will soon decide whether to take up LGBT rights cases
- Blog Post|State-by-state post-election roundup
- Blog Post|House flip unlikely to have impact on labor and employment law
- Blog Post|"Sexual Harassment Defense Industrial Complex"? Gimme a break.
- Blog Post|DOJ v. EEOC on LGBT: Game on?
- Blog Post|Thank you, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor
- Analysis|Less than a week to go! NJ Earned Sick Leave Law takes effect next Monday.
- Blog Post|What's up for employers? Trump releases Fall '18 regulatory agenda
- Blog Post|For your protection: ABA says lawyers must inform clients of data breaches
- Blog Post|World's worst bosses -- for employers who don't want to be sued
- Blog Post|EEOC now says it IS having a #MeToo spike
- Blog Post|Recruiting AI discriminates against women?!
- Blog Post|An employment lawyer's thoughts on the Kavanaugh controversy
- Blog Post|Supreme Court-LGBT rights update
- Analysis|New York State sexual harassment training deadline is extended, but you’d better have your policy in place ASAP!
- Blog Post|PA Human Rights Commission to treat LGBT bias as "sex" discrimination
- Blog Post|FMLA quirks quiz!
- Blog Post|Employers, just say no to these disability/pregnancy practices!
- Blog Post|Not covered by the FLSA, but still liable for FLSA retaliation?
- Blog Post|Retaliation: A workplace soap opera
- Blog Post|Can you require employees to come to work in a hurricane?
- Blog Post|9.11.01
- Blog Post|That's a sexist rule, bra!
- Blog Post|Is the sexual harassment "groundswell" starting?
- Analysis|New York State releases proposed harassment materials
- Blog Post|New York State releases proposed harassment materials
- Blog Post|Updated FMLA forms are now available
- Blog Post|Drug testing quiz!
- Analysis|Delaware enacts new sexual harassment provisions – with mandatory training!
- Blog Post|Almost everybody wants the Supreme Court to rule on LGBT rights.
- Blog Post|Flatulent security cop goes viral -- then gets fired.
- Blog Post|DOL to hold "listening sessions" on white-collar OT exemptions
- Blog Post|Cybersabotage: The hot tactic of today's disgruntled employee
- Blog Post|Should the OWBPA protections apply to under-40s, too?
- Blog Post|Hostile work environment, or just NSFW?
- Blog Post|This ADA accommodation case went wrong in so many ways.
- Blog Post|Masterpiece Cakeshop, Round 2
- Blog Post|Gender pay gap starts -- in childhood?
- Blog Post|Due for a drug test? Stay away from poppy-seed bagels!
- Blog Post|Reason #12 why you don't want to nominate us for the ABA Web 100
- Blog Post|Reason #11 why you don't want to nominate us for the ABA Web 100
- Blog Post|Big LGBT bias case has settled
- Blog Post|Reason #10 why you don't want to nominate us for the ABA Web 100
- Blog Post|Reason #9 why you don't want to nominate us for the ABA Web 100
- Blog Post|Reason #8 why you don't want to nominate us for the ABA Web 100
- Blog Post|Funeral home seeks SCOTUS review of transgender bias case
- Blog Post|Second-guessing the advice columns: Don't lie about why you terminated an employee.
- Blog Post|Reason #7 why you don't want to nominate us for the ABA Web 100
- Blog Post|Reason #6 why you don't want to nominate us for the ABA Web 100
- Blog Post|Reason #5 why you don't want to nominate us for the ABA Web 100
- Blog Post|Reason #4 why you don't want to nominate us for the ABA Web 100
- Blog Post|Reason #3 why you don't want to nominate us for the ABA Web 100
- Blog Post|Reason #2 why you don't want to nominate us for the ABA Web 100
- Blog Post|Michigan does a 360 on LGBT rights
- Blog Post|The Dirty Dozen: 12 reasons why you shouldn't nominate us for the ABA Web 100
- Blog Post|Are generational stereotypes a bunch of baloney?
- Blog Post|A pregnancy-disability-FMLA triple whammy
- Blog Post|Court refuses to review another sexual orientation case
- Blog Post|DOL's Persuader Rule just got a little bit deader
- Blog Post|Zero tolerance for "zero tolerance" policies
- Blog Post|Jobs are back!
- Blog Post|World's worst boss? and a big FMLA loophole
- Blog Post|And the nominee is . . .
- Blog Post|More Supreme Court scuttlebutt
- Blog Post|The SCOTUS contenders on employment law: Brett Kavanaugh
- Blog Post|The SCOTUS contenders on employment law: Amy Coney Barrett
- Blog Post|Our 1,000th blog post! Yippee!
- Blog Post|The SCOTUS contenders on employment law: Raymond Kethledge
- Blog Post|The SCOTUS contenders on employment law: Amul Thapar
- Blog Post|Miss Mannerly answers all of your summer dress code questions
- Blog Post|Justice Kennedy to retire
- Blog Post|#MeToo? Everybody's having sex at work
- Blog Post|Incoming! Another sexual orientation bias case is on the way
- Blog Post|You think your employer's a meanie?
- Blog Post|"Bed bug" lawsuit allowed to go forward
- Blog Post|Five fun facts about fathers (in the workplace)
- Blog Post|Minimum wages to increase July 1 - are you ready?
- Blog Post|Still no #MeToo uptick in sex harassment charges, EEOC says
- Blog Post|Woo-hoo! Normal HR policies are legal again, says NLRB General Counsel
- Blog Post|Who's holding up those EEOC appointments? Republicans!
- Blog Post|Medical inquiries and the ADA
- Blog Post|This week in employment law
- Blog Post|LGBT bias case going to Supreme Court?
- Blog Post|Memorial Day 2018
- Blog Post|"Employment at will" quiz!
- Blog Post|Michigan's civil rights law now includes LGBT protections
- Blog Post|Are things really that bad for mothers at work?
- Blog Post|In memory of Julius Turman
- Blog Post|#MeToo quiz!
- Blog Post|What's on the feds' regulatory agenda
- Blog Post|This is NOT the way to beat a drug test.
- Blog Post|Job applicants have disparate impact claim based on age, court says
- Blog Post|The employer's side of the story.
- Blog Post|Don't scrap the "severe or pervasive" standard in sex harassment cases
- Blog Post|Jury socks it to "Onionhead" employer for $5.1 million
- Blog Post|Want more money? Be ugly!
- Blog Post|50 states, 50 sexual harassment training requirements
- Blog Post|Rev. Ernest Angley wins wage-hour case
- Blog Post|Proto-sexual harasser found!
- Blog Post|Is use of salary history inherently discriminatory?
- Blog Post|Senate confirms John Ring to NLRB (updated)
- Blog Post|Employers, you can still win a transgender bias case.
- Blog Post|The gender pay gap is smaller than you think.
- Blog Post|Want a baby? Line up by seniority, please.
- Blog Post|It ain't cool to be an April Fool.
- Blog Post|Second-guessing the advice columns: #MeToo edition
- Blog Post|Sexts, and -- crickets? The week's worst employees
- Blog Post|Trump nominates General Counsel to EEOC
- Blog Post|The breakdown on that "transgender funeral home" decision
- Blog Post|March Madness at work! Fool your boss!
- Blog Post|"This week in employment law" quiz!
- Blog Post|Will drug testing become a thing of the past?
- Blog Post|Another court says Title VII bans sexual orientation bias: Debating the issues
- Blog Post|BREAKING: Another appeals court says Title VII bans sexual orientation bias
- Blog Post|ALJ decision in favor of Union is vacated for -- sexism!
- Blog Post|10 ways employers give their employees a "bad hair day"
- Blog Post|I have an excuse to write about Stormy Daniels and Donald Trump.
- Blog Post|A ho-hum EEOC strategic plan? Maybe that's not so bad.
- Blog Post|The latest workplace problem: Workers with too little to do
- Blog Post|Have a workplace romance question? Ask the doctor!
- Blog Post|Criminal background guidance enjoined -- could that affect you?
- Blog Post|Is telecommuting a reasonable accommodation? It depends.
- Blog Post|EEOC charges were down in FY2017 . . . but don't celebrate just yet
- Blog Post|Company settles EEOC pregnancy accommodation suit for $80K
- Blog Post|Rep. Meehan's sex harassment settlement proves my points about NDAs
- Blog Post|Religious discrimination against one of "your own"? Yes, it can happen.
- Blog Post|EEO-1 Reports for 2017 are now being accepted!
- Blog Post|Government Shutdown Central (UPDATE: Soon to reopen!)
- Blog Post|Aziz Ansari, and 10 old-fashioned ways to bail on a bad date
- Blog Post|Let's talk about these new "conscience" protections for healthcare employees
- Blog Post|It's official: Trump names John Ring for NLRB vacancy
- Blog Post|Apologies to our commenters!
- Blog Post|MARTIN LUTHER KING: Jan. 15, 1929-Apr. 4, 1968
- Blog Post|In defense of confidentiality (yes, even in harassment cases)
- Blog Post|Career outlook for 2018: What's your sign, baby?
- Blog Post|Alleged harasser is a victim of -- ADA "associational" discrimination?
- Blog Post|Catching up: New NLRB chair, starting over, new minimum wages
- Blog Post|See you in 2018!
- Blog Post|A visit from St. Nick, Esq.
- Blog Post|Court vacates parts of EEOC wellness rules, effective 1/1/19
- Blog Post|You gotta quit kickin' HR around
- Blog Post|Hello, goodbye
- Blog Post|SCOTUS won't review sexual orientation bias case
- Blog Post|Happy Hanukkah!
- Blog Post|Bill would ban arbitration in sex bias cases -- is that a good idea?
- Blog Post|Miss Manners delicately sidesteps employment law faux pas!
- Blog Post|Don't believe everything you read.
- Blog Post|We made the ABA Web 100. Thank you, thank you, thank you!
- Analysis|WHAT NOW? The sexual harassment scandals, and what employers can do to protect themselves and their employees
- Blog Post|10 things for which this employment lawyer is thankful in 2017
- Blog Post|Three hot regulatory issues for employers to watch
- Blog Post|Afraid you may be a sexual harasser? Some helpful dos and don'ts
- Blog Post|Yakkity yak. Please join me for these coming events!
- Blog Post|Want to pan your employer online? Be careful!
- Blog Post|BREAKING: Peter Robb confirmed as NLRB General Counsel
- Blog Post|#MeToo? Sure, but not all sexual harassment is alike, and not all workplaces are like Hollywood.
- Blog Post|Everything you always wanted to know about our media portal.*
- Blog Post|Reasonable accommodation quiz for employers!
- Blog Post|Affirmative Action Edition: THIS IS IT!
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|Eight takes on sexual harassment and Harvey Weinstein
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|The ADA: Four issues to watch in 2018
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|Title VII does not ban gender identity discrimination, DOJ says
- Blog Post|Coming soon: Affirmative Action Edition!
- Blog Post|Catholic priest is (allegedly) an equal opportunity offender, court says, dismissing bias suit
- Blog Post|“Overqualified,” or just too old?
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|Emanuel confirmed to NLRB, and GOP now in the majority
- Blog Post|Trump’s EEOC nominations are rocking along – and here’s what we can expect
- Blog Post|Employers, I’m on your side — so watch out! ;-)
- Blog Post|Employment law quiz: Bizarro edition
- Blog Post|BREAKING: Trump nominates Peter Robb as NLRB General Counsel
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|9.11.01
- Blog Post|BREAKING: It’s over! USDOL’s overtime appeal is dismissed
- Blog Post|Cheryl Stanton nominated for Wage Hour Administrator
- Blog Post|Hurricane Harvey
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|Obama overtime rule is declared invalid — for good? (Let’s hope.)
- Blog Post|For “Labor Day” (get it?): Three pregnancy cases from the EEOC
- Blog Post|BREAKING: Obama overtime rule is struck down
- Analysis|EEO-1 “pay data” requirement is on hold
- Blog Post|EEO-1 “pay data” requirement is on hold: The details
- Blog Post|BREAKING: EEO-1 “pay survey” reporting deadline suspended
- Blog Post|AARP's wellness win against the EEOC: The "law nerd" version
- Blog Post|Is Robert Lee a victim of national origin discrimination?
- Blog Post|WOW! Court invalidates EEOC wellness rules
- Blog Post|Trump reportedly has chosen his nominee for NLRB General Counsel
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|Before you fire that political extremist . . .
- Blog Post|NC "employee classification" law warrants caution but doesn't change substantive law
- Analysis|NC “employee classification” legislation warrants caution but doesn’t change substantive law
- Blog Post|Q and A on the recent controversy
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|Employer Beware: Bad "optics" create hostile work environment?
- Blog Post|Employer loses defense to EEOC suit because it didn't preserve records
- Blog Post|Employer Beware: When "good" isn't good enough (disability bias)
- Blog Post|Bummer. NLRB Chairman Miscimarra is leaving in December
- Blog Post|You decide: Why the DOJ says Title VII does NOT prohibit sexual orientation bias
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|Kaplan confirmed to NLRB - we now have an "R-D" tie
- Blog Post|President Trump nominates Iraq veteran Daniel Gade to EEOC Commissioner spot
- Blog Post|Please vote for us for the ABA Web 100: Reason #20
- Blog Post|Please vote for us for the ABA Web 100: Reason #19
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|Please vote for us for the ABA Web 100: Reason #18
- Blog Post|Thinking out loud about medical marijuana and reasonable accommodation
- Blog Post|Trump v. Sessions: Are we witnessing a "constructive discharge" in real time?
- Blog Post|DOL asks for feedback on salary levels in overtime rule
- Blog Post|Battle of the feds! DOJ, EEOC lock horns on sexual orientation bias
- Blog Post|Please vote for us for the ABA Web 100: Reason #17
- Blog Post|EEOC sues over - get this - "Spanish-only" policy
- Blog Post|Please vote for us for the ABA Web 100: Reason #16
- Blog Post|Please vote for us for the ABA Web 100: Reason #15
- Blog Post|Please vote for us for the ABA Web 100: Reason #13
- Blog Post|Please vote for us for the ABA Web 100: Reason #14
- Blog Post|Please vote for us for the ABA Web 100: Reason #12
- Blog Post|"Not my employee, not my problem." Oh, yeah?
- Blog Post|NLRB nominees Kaplan, Emanuel advance to Senate vote
- Blog Post|Please vote for us for ABA Web 100: Reason #11
- Blog Post|Hate those EEOC regs? Here's your big chance!
- Blog Post|Please vote for us for the ABA Web 100: Reason #10
- Blog Post|Please vote for us for the ABA Web 100: Reason #9
- Blog Post|Please vote for us for the ABA Web 100: Reason #8
- Blog Post|Please vote for us for the ABA Web 100: Reason #7
- Blog Post|Please vote for us for the ABA Web 100: Reason #6
- Blog Post|Please vote for us for the ABA Web 100: Reason #5
- Blog Post|Please vote for us for the ABA Web 100: Reason #4
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|For the ADEA's 50th birthday: An age discrimination quiz
- Blog Post|Please vote for us for the ABA web 100: Reason #3
- Blog Post|Senate hearing on labor and employment nominees set for today -- but will it happen?
- Blog Post|Please vote for us for the ABA Web 100: Reason #2
- Blog Post|Please vote for us for the ABA Web 100: Reason #1 (19 to follow!)
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|Are you a harassment "daredevil"? Here are 5 behaviors that put you at risk.
- Blog Post|11th Circuit refuses to revisit sexual orientation decision
- Blog Post|Happy Fourth of July!
- Blog Post|Trump nominates Janet Dhillon to head EEOC
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|Well, that's weird. Trump DOL will pursue appeal of overtime decision
- Blog Post|Litigation tactics can be FLSA retaliation? Wow.
- Blog Post|It's SUMMER! Top 4 ways employers can get burned
- Blog Post|In honor of Father's Day, a look at paid parental leave
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|Satanic band is the Diet Coke of evil, employment lawsuit shows
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|Can you fire an employee for off-duty misconduct? You betcha!
- Analysis|U.S. Department of Labor withdraws guidance on independent contractors, joint employment - Client Bulletin
- Analysis|U.S. Department of Labor withdraws Obama guidance on independent contractors, joint employment
- Blog Post|Gender dysphoria: Is it an ADA-protected disability?
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|Second-guessing the advice columns on workplace law -- again!
- Blog Post|Memorial Day 2017
- Blog Post|After the investigation: Now what?
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|BREAKING: Full Second Circuit to reconsider whether Title VII prohibits sexual orientation bias
- Blog Post|Trumpdate: Proposed budget shows "yuuuge" changes afoot in labor and employment arena
- Blog Post|Treat your employees right!
- Blog Post|Killjoys reject one-hour "sex break" proposal
- Blog Post|Proposed merger of EEOC, OFCCP faces opposition from both sides
- Blog Post|9 traits of a bang-up workplace investigation
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|Mother's Day Employment Law Quiz! Pregnancy, lactation, you name it!
- Blog Post|Trumpdate: NLRB finalists, EEOC to swallow up OFCCP?
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|HR's hottest must-have: universal workplace emoji!
- Blog Post|Comp time bill passes the House
- Blog Post|"Ask Amy," part deux: Amy gets the message
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|6 timekeeping practices that reduce your risk of wage-hour liability
- Blog Post|We have a Secretary of Labor! (almost)
- Blog Post|Trump names Miscimarra Chairman of the NLRB (no more of this "Acting" stuff!)
- Blog Post|Is your timekeeping system creating wage-hour liability?
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|Don't "Ask Amy"!*
- Blog Post|Employers, spike those "high heels" dress code requirements!
- Blog Post|"Comp time" for private sector employees: What's not to like?
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|"The Bermuda Triangle" ADA-FMLA-Workers' Comp Quiz
- Blog Post|GORSUCH CONFIRMED
- Analysis|TITLE VII PROHIBITS SEXUAL ORIENTATION BIAS, SEVENTH CIRCUIT FINDS
- Blog Post|BREAKING: Title VII bans sexual orientation bias, court finds
- Analysis|The Deep Dive: A closer look at the Seventh Circuit’s sexual orientation decision
- Blog Post|The Deep Dive: A closer look at the Seventh Circuit's sexual orientation decision
- Blog Post|10 habits of highly effective HR professionals (April Fool's edition)
- Blog Post|Trumpdate: Labor nominee Acosta gets through HELP Committee, Dems support Gorsuch
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|North Carolina's HB 2 is history
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|"The freezing trucker" and Gorsuch's heart of ice: A micro-fiction
- Blog Post|It's OFCCP audit time! Six questions contractors should ask themselves
- Blog Post|"Free to Be . . . You and Me": The 11th Circuit's strange LGBT decision
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|"HR Horribles" -- collect 'em all!
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|Trumpdate: Beware the Ides of March!
- Blog Post|Is Siri a victim and a cause of sexual harassment?
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|EEOC asks court to throw out wellness lawsuit filed by AARP
- Blog Post|Trumpdate: What's in Ivanka's "paid family leave" plan?
- Blog Post|Queen for a day: If I ran the world, would I scrap our employment laws?
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|Trumpdate: Tons of employment-related stuff!
- Blog Post|"BYOD" policies - are there risks? You betcha!
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|That smarts! Porn "sting" operation gets employer "stung" for retaliation
- Blog Post|Presenting the new nominee for Secretary of Labor: Alexander Acosta
- Blog Post|Trumpdate: What do you think about Andrew Puzder and his "scandals"?
- Blog Post|BREAKING: Puzder expected to withdraw! (UPDATED: He did.)
- Blog Post|Trumpdate: Court refuses to stay TRO against travel ban, Puzder hearing scheduled
- Blog Post|5 ways to ensure your workplace Valentine doesn't break your heart -- or get you fired
- Blog Post|There goes another one! Missouri right-to-work legislation signed into law.
- Blog Post|Daily* Trumpdate: Live stream the oral argument in Trump "travel ban TRO" appeal
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|An FMLA cautionary tale for employers.
- Blog Post|Daily Trumpdate: Gorsuch seems to care about real people
- Blog Post|Daily Trumpdate: It's Neil Gorsuch! Puzder postponed perpetually?
- Blog Post|Daily Trumpdate: Must-see TV, LGBT protections here to stay, ICE to harden?, best way to less regulation
- Blog Post|Daily Trumpdate: The notorious immigration order, and what employers can expect in 2017
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|Workplace harassment: EEOC's employer best practices
- Blog Post|Daily Trumpdate: Rough times for Puzder?
- Blog Post|Daily Trumpdate: DOL requests extension in overtime case
- Blog Post|Daily Trumpdate (Part Deux): Philip Miscimarra named NLRB chair
- Blog Post|Daily Trumpdate: The 4 known SCOTUS contenders
- Blog Post|Daily Trumpdate (2): Victoria Lipnic named as acting chair of EEOC
- Blog Post|Daily Trumpdate: Good meeting with union reps
- Blog Post|Trump quickies: Regulatory freeze, "listening session" with unions, Puzder status
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|9 "fun" facts about workplace harassment, from the EEOC
- Blog Post|Martin Luther King: Jan. 15, 1929-April 4, 1968
- Blog Post|Nitpicking the EEOC's proposed guidance on harassment
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|We have an office . . . in San Francisco . . .
- Blog Post|Kentucky goes right-to-work
- Blog Post|Court won't block EEOC's wellness rules -- for now.
- Blog Post|Fact Check: Does Labor nominee Puzder really want to put people out of work?
- Blog Post|Quick update on the FLSA overtime rule
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|See you next year!
- Blog Post|The 12 Days of You-Know-What: Employers' Edition
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|Has legal pot made workplace drug policies go up in smoke?
- Blog Post|11 traits of good employer documentation
- Blog Post|Employers, here's why good documentation is da bomb.
- Blog Post|Trump to nominate fast food exec Andy Puzder as Secretary of Labor
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|What should employers do about overtime now? Ask the wage-hour lawyers.
- Blog Post|Thank you ever so much! We made the ABA Blawg 100 again!
- Blog Post|2016 workplace holiday party central!
- Blog Post|BREAKING: OSHA reasonable reporting procedure rule is NOT enjoined!
- Blog Post|Employment and labor law developments (and a few other things) I'm thankful for
- Analysis|EMPLOYERS CAN BREATHE A SIGH OF RELIEF COME DECEMBER 1: Court strikes down overtime rule
- Blog Post|Court blocks DOL overtime rule: The fuller story
- Blog Post|BREAKING: Overtime rule has been enjoined!
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|EEOC performance in FY 2016: Is the Agency "mellowing"?
- Blog Post|Everything's happening in Texas!
- Analysis|Do your employee-recruiting practices make you a white-collar criminal?
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|Oh, wait a minute -- sexual orientation bias DOES violate Title VII?
- Analysis|Labor and Employment Law in a Trump Administration
- Blog Post|"It's going to be beautiful, believe me": Trump on labor & employment law issues
- Blog Post|ConstangyTV is on the air!
- Blog Post|Appearance code quiz for employers!
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Analysis|Preventive Medicine - Fall 2016
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|What is "voluntary"? Thoughts about the AARP wellness lawsuit against the EEOC
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|Workplace investigations and the case of the planted peanut butter
- Blog Post|A Boss's Day letter from . . . The Boss.
- Blog Post|EEOC appeals loss in Detroit transgender case
- Blog Post|Disaster Unemployment Assistance available for 23 counties in NC
- Blog Post|Court sets aside Title VII sexual orientation decision, agrees to rehear
- Blog Post|Heresy! Is "flexibility at work" overrated?
- Blog Post|Restroom use "catch 22" for transgender individuals violates Title VII, court says
- Blog Post|Peanut passions, the ADA, and co-workers who take an employee's allergy with a grain of salt
- Blog Post|The "Onionhead" case: Fringe beliefs and reverse religious discrimination by employers
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|2016 Employer's Guide to Employee Voting Rights is here!
- Blog Post|Shanah Tovah*!
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|EEO-1 reports will require comp information starting 2017-18
- Analysis|EEOC follows through: Comp data will be required in EEO-1 reports
- Blog Post|FLSA overtime rule: With all these efforts to block it, can employers relax?
- Blog Post|EEOC Small Business Resource Center: Two thumbs up!
- Blog Post|Hillary, or The Donald: A voting guide for employers
- Blog Post|BREAKING: 21 states sue USDOL about FLSA overtime rule
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|Employer dos and don'ts for 2016 elections (NLRB-friendly version)
- Blog Post|Holey moley! Fox News pays $20MM to settle Gretchen Carlson sexual harassment case
- Blog Post|Happy Labor Day!
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|About that new "cat's paw" decision . . .
- Blog Post|How to make the EEOC love you (retaliation edition)
- Blog Post|Federal judge in NC temporarily blocks H.B. 2
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|Shoddy harassment investigation comes back to bite employer
- Blog Post|The EEOC's defeat in Detroit: Pants, skirts, gender identity, and religion
- Blog Post|Spa day! Let's do an FLSA white-collar exemption makeover!
- Blog Post|BREAKING: Detroit-area funeral home wins in EEOC transgender case
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|Can't we all just get along? Bridging the generation gap at work
- Blog Post|The polls are closing for the ABA Blawg 100 - don't forget to vote!
- Blog Post|Huh? Title VII and sexual orientation bias, revisited
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|Conservative expression may be unlawful harassment, EEOC says
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|ABA Blawg 100: Please vote!
- Blog Post|Sex on TV: Final FAQs for employers about the Roger Ailes case
- Blog Post|Hallelujah! 5 things about religion in the workplace that you may not have known
- Blog Post|Password sharing and "head-slap hacks": What employers can do
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|Ailes is out
- Blog Post|NC "bathroom bill" - the latest developments
- Blog Post|Gretchen Carlson v. Roger Ailes -- can he sue her?
- Blog Post|Weekly catch-up
- Blog Post|EEOC issues wellness disclosure form, Q and A
- Blog Post|EEOC amends its "pay survey" proposal a teensy bit. I still don't like it.
- Blog Post|Employer groups sue to block OSHA's drug testing provisions
- Blog Post|Sex harassment myth: "He said/she said" is no big deal.
- Blog Post|When New Jersey says marital status discrimination is illegal, it's serious.
- Blog Post|"EEO" wrongful discharge may soon return to North Carolina
- Blog Post|Happy 240th birthday, U.S.A.!
- Blog Post|EEOC sexual orientation lawsuit settles for $200K plus
- Blog Post|Light reading for your Fourth of July weekend
- Blog Post|Applicant tracking and the EEOC: "You can SUE us for that?"
- Blog Post|Judge Blocks U.S. Department of Labor "Persuader Rule"
- Blog Post|School's out! So what's with this summer employment law quiz?
- Blog Post|Your summer labor and employment reading list -- for this week, anyway
- Blog Post|The "duty to conciliate" doesn't mean the EEOC has to be reasonable.
- Blog Post|FLSA morale nightmare: Dealing with the "new non-exempt"
- Blog Post|Look out, employers! The new Class Action Outlook is out!
- Blog Post|25 quick takes (no kidding!) on the EEOC's proposed national origin guidance
- Blog Post|The clock starts when? SCOTUS decision in Green v. Brennan
- Blog Post|Memorial Day, 2016
- Blog Post|This week on FOCUS, our women's leadership blog
- Blog Post|Military employment rights: A recap for the Memorial Day weekend
- Blog Post|Threats, and rumors of threats, enough to overturn union election, court says
- Blog Post|Is sexual harassment training a turn-off for men?
- Blog Post|Too many RULES, man!
- Blog Post|Your overtime rule news portal for today
- Analysis|Wellness Programs, and the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act: The final chapter
- Analysis|EEOC issues final rules on wellness programs and ADA, GINA
- Blog Post|Legal, or Illegal? Employee leaves of absence and the ADA
- Blog Post|This week on FOCUS, our women's leadership blog
- Blog Post|Unfair Competition and Trade Secrets everywhere!
- Blog Post|Tit for tat: Feds sue North Carolina over HB 2
- Blog Post|BREAKING: North Carolina sues USDOJ over bathroom law
- Blog Post|This week in FOCUS, our women's leadership blog
- Blog Post|Oh, joy! A wage payment quiz!
- Blog Post|U.S. Department of Justice threatens NC over HB 2
- Blog Post|EEOC posts fact sheets on LGBT discrimination, transgender issues
- Blog Post|Court sheds light on "pregnancy accommodation" obligation after Young v. UPS
- Blog Post|Your labor and employment reading for this weekend.
- Blog Post|Lego-based workplace harassment will NOT be tolerated.
- Blog Post|Employer guide to Family and Medical Leave Act
- Blog Post|When must a successor employer bargain with unions?
- Blog Post|North Carolina's HB 2: The final analysis
- Blog Post|Vindicated, and it feels so good . . .
- Blog Post|You won't want to miss . . .
- Blog Post|Ugh. HR consultant hit for $1MM in unpaid overtime
- Blog Post|Welcome to FOCUS, our new women's leadership blog!
- Blog Post|This just in: Gov. McCrory signs Executive Order backing wrongful discharge for "EEO" discrimination
- Blog Post|More on HB 2 and wrongful discharge: My response to Charlotte Magazine
- Blog Post|Is obesity a "per se" disability? One court says no.
- Blog Post|Ignore the hype: Here's what employers need to know about North Carolina's HB 2
- Blog Post|Eighth Circuit says eye-rolling is not harassment.
- Blog Post|No April foolin' - third lawsuit challenging DOL Persuader Rule is filed
- Blog Post|"Lighten up, baby," and other harassment "best practices" for employers
- Blog Post|First lawsuit challenges DOL's Persuader Rule
- Blog Post|Second lawsuit challenges USDOL Persuader Rule
- Blog Post|Suit seeks to block N.C. "bathroom bill"
- Blog Post|Gender pay gap is greatly exaggerated, new study says
- Blog Post|N.C. "bathroom bill" has a bomb for wrongful discharge plaintiffs
- Blog Post|Hold onto your hats! DOL Persuader Rule is here.
- Blog Post|Female lawyers, Republican bosses, and kitchens: The Sequel
- Blog Post|Is driving an "essential function of the job" for your road warriors?
- Blog Post|What can employers expect from a Justice Garland?
- Blog Post|Female lawyer with Republican boss? Go back to the kitchen!
- Blog Post|Is your company small? The EEOC has a little fact sheet that may help.
- Blog Post|Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of employees? The Shadow knows.
- Blog Post|Happy 25th anniversary, Winston-Salem Office!
- Blog Post|BREAKING: EEOC files 2 Title VII suits alleging sexual orientation bias
- Blog Post|Why shouldn't supervisors investigate workplace harassment? They're too normal.
- Blog Post|How would you rate Yelp as an employer?
- Blog Post|BREAKING: DOL releases proposed rule on paid sick leave for employees of federal contractors
- Blog Post|Don't be a "Streisand Effect" employer.
- Blog Post|SLAM DUNK: Student athletes' wage suit against NCAA and universities is dismissed
- Analysis|SLAM DUNK: Student Athletes' Wage Suit Against NCAA and Universities Is Dismissed
- Blog Post|Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete announces new offices in Miami and L.A., and new partners
- Blog Post|Tributes to Justice Antonin Scalia, March 11 1936-February 13 2016
- Blog Post|W. Va. will go right-to-work in July
- Blog Post|Be my workplace valentine? We'll see . . .
- Blog Post|EEOC Retaliation Guidance, Part 3: A "causal connection" checklist for employers
- Blog Post|$89K manager may not be FLSA-exempt, court rules
- Blog Post|Speaking of equal pay . . . here's a "demand-side" solution! *joke*
- Blog Post|EEOC Retaliation Guidance, Part 2: Was your employment action "adverse"?
- Blog Post|Friendly reminder: Reverse discrimination is against the law, too
- Blog Post|5 things I don't like about the EEOC's "pay survey" proposal
- Analysis|IS YOUR PAY EQUITY UP TO SNUFF? EEOC plans to start collecting pay data, and using it
- Blog Post|EEOC Retaliation Guidance, Part 1: You gotta be "protected"!
- Blog Post|Employers: Concerned about class actions? Look no further!
- Blog Post|Transgender roadmap: 10 steps the EEOC thinks employers should take
- Blog Post|Struggling as a lawyer? Then be more like a stripper! Yeah, that's the ticket.
- Blog Post|Employment Law Blog Carnival: Iowa Caucus Edition
- Blog Post|The Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jan. 15, 1929-April 4, 1968
- Blog Post|BREAKING: Transgender claim will go to jury
- Blog Post|Unequal pay causes mental illness? Let's not jump to conclusions.
- Blog Post|Employers, the ADA interactive process applies to post-offer medical examination, too
- Blog Post|Did Bill Clinton "sexually harass" Monica Lewinsky? Uh, no.
- Blog Post|Why the EEOC believes Title VII bans sexual orientation bias
- Blog Post|T.J. Simers $7.1 million discrimination verdict: Easy come, easy go?
- Blog Post|Who was naughty, and who was nice in employment law this year
- Blog Post|Home for the Holidays (well, offline, anyway . . .)
- Blog Post|Have yourself an inclusive little Christmas . . .
- Blog Post|When a customer harasses your employee - what should you do?
- Blog Post|Despite "legal pot" laws, employers still hanging tough
- Blog Post|The December Employment Law Blog Carnival is up!
- Blog Post|Male minister who won't wear makeup sues for religious bias
- Blog Post|Two new high-profile employment suits that you'll want to watch
- Blog Post|As the rotunda turns . . . affair, coverup, retaliation -- and lawsuit against state House
- Blog Post|Trojan travails: Coach Sarkisian's alcoholism-discrimination lawsuit against USC
- Blog Post|Supreme Court to review CRST attorneys' fee award against EEOC
- Blog Post|Happy Chanukah!
- Blog Post|It's the 2015 workplace holiday party quiz!
- Blog Post|EEOC provides ADA guidance for employees' doctors
- Blog Post|Because that's where the money is?
- Blog Post|A cornucopia of wellness information for employers!
- Blog Post|Be thankful you're not an employment law turkey
- Blog Post|We made the ABA Blawg 100 again. I love you guys!
- Analysis|The EEOC and wellness programs: The other shoe drops! (But it's not that bad)
- Blog Post|Pretty good year for the EEOC (in pictures)
- Blog Post|BEFORE YOU SUE: 10 questions every employee should ask
- Blog Post|New Overtime Regs: Will "duties test" be beefed up after all?
- Blog Post|Jacqueline Berrien, former head of EEOC, dies at 53
- Blog Post|DOL's Home Care Rule goes live.
- Blog Post|BEFORE YOU FIRE: 20 questions every employer should ask
- Blog Post|Thank you, veterans.
- Blog Post|Six quick takes on the EEOC's new wellness proposal
- Blog Post|Love Your Lawyer Day? Bah, humbug!
- Blog Post|T.J. Simers $7.1 mill discrimination verdict: Post-game wrap-up
- Blog Post|BREAKING: T.J. Simers awarded $7.1 million!
- Blog Post|T.J. Simers discrimination trial: We thought he'd never rest!
- Blog Post|BREAKING: EEOC issues proposed rule on wellness programs and the GINA
- Blog Post|Straight from the source: EEOC's 10 hottest litigation trends
- Blog Post|Denial isn't just a river in Egypt - it may be defamation. Ask Bill Cosby.
- Blog Post|T.J. Simers discrimination trial: At last, the "ethical breach"!
- Blog Post|EEEK! The Employment Law Blog Carnival is up . . . don't you dare miss it!
- Blog Post|T.J. Simers discrimination trial: "He lied, and he went too far!"
- Blog Post|For Boss's Day: Seven traits of a "World's Best Boss"
- Blog Post|Performance reviews for marriages: what could go wrong?
- Blog Post|Gorilla schtick, Juneteenth, and quit while you're ahead
- Analysis|DOL to start enforcing new Home-Care Rule November 12
- Blog Post|T.J. Simers discrimination trial: Has he folded under questioning?
- Blog Post|BREAKING: Young and UPS settle pregnancy lawsuit
- Blog Post|T.J. Simers discrimination trial: Are you paranoid if they really ARE out to get you?
- Blog Post|HR FUN PUZZLE: Find what the AARP did right with this underperforming employee
- Blog Post|Betty Davis, April 3, 1932-September 29, 2015
- Blog Post|Shrink says sports columnist may not recover from depression
- Blog Post|Double whammy for employer who won't accommodate pregnancy -- but will the EEOC's case survive?
- Blog Post|It's the World Series of discrimination trials! Catch it!
- Blog Post|Can you terminate an employee for acting in self-defense? Maybe not.
- Blog Post|EEOC wins most of discovery dispute in transgender case
- Analysis|UNDER THE BUS: Feds’ new focus on individual wrongdoers has implications for employers
- Blog Post|What's your two cents? Employment law in the news
- Blog Post|And a happy #$%!&;!*! new year to you, too!
- Blog Post|When terminating an employee, is a clean break better than a long limbo?
- Blog Post|9.11.01
- Blog Post|Holy legal fees, Batman!
- Blog Post|Technology blunder lands ex-employee in court
- Blog Post|Yes, employers may have to accommodate even "crazy" religious beliefs.
- Blog Post|Can an employee be fired for having too many kids?
- Blog Post|The on-air shootings at WDBJ-TV: When bad things happen to good employees
- Blog Post|How to succeed with your health insurance provider
- Blog Post|4 thoughts on the Ashley Madison hack
- Blog Post|Can employees trust Human Resources?
- Blog Post|ABA Blawg 100: Only a few days left to vote!
- Blog Post|Is protected activity part of your job? You may still be protected.
- Blog Post|Seems like this should be an excused absence.
- Blog Post|Robin's quickie guide to the U.S. Courts of Appeal
- Blog Post|5 ways employers can spend a lot less time in court
- Blog Post|Darn.
- Blog Post|ABA Blawg 100: Please vote!
- Blog Post|Six things about the ADA that even an employer can love.
- Blog Post|Jim Coleman: Twitter wage-hour hero
- Blog Post|How much, er, discovery is allowed in a transgender lawsuit?
- Blog Post|Is it "disparaging" to say "Karma is a bi**h"?
- Blog Post|Where's Jimmy Hoffa?
- Blog Post|Employment law autopsy: "Old fart" gets fired
- Blog Post|Document review attorneys may not be exempt from OT, court says
- Blog Post|EEOC, Abercrombie settle hijab lawsuit
- Blog Post|Women aren't lead counsel as often as men - it's gotta be bias!
- Blog Post|Employees' "low-tech" sloppiness causes high-tech problems
- Blog Post|You've been warned - those independent contractors are probably employees
- Blog Post|Your employee ODs? You may be responsible.
- Blog Post|BREAKING: DOL issues memo on independent contractors
- Blog Post|This week in employment law, with a lick and a promise
- Blog Post|Happy Fourth of July!
- Blog Post|EEOC's revised pregnancy guidance: Now, just barely more flexible!
- Blog Post|What does SCOTUS same-sex marriage decision mean for employers?
- Blog Post|Affordable Care Act is a go, says Supreme Court
- Blog Post|Thanks a LOT, Mr. President!
- Blog Post|BREAKING: Same-sex marriage is the law of the land, SCOTUS says
- Blog Post|Employers, you'll never pooh-pooh the GINA again.
- Blog Post|Harassment "must-have" no. 5: No retaliation!
- Blog Post|Harassment "must-have" no. 4: The Determination
- Blog Post|"Must-haves" for your harassment investigation
- Blog Post|EEOC v. Abercrombie's lesson for employers - in 5 minutes or your money back
- Blog Post|Five harassment "must haves" for employers
- Blog Post|Memorial Day 2015
- Blog Post|Female lawyer plays the "V" card, wins $500 sanction
- Blog Post|Probability, manipulation, and random drug testing
- Blog Post|Is this new harassment decision the end of the world for employers?
- Blog Post|Can we stop with the age-based stereotypes?
- Blog Post|Proposed overtime rule has been sent to OMB
- Blog Post|EEOC rolls out "Digital Charge" program for private employers
- Blog Post|Did he quit, or was he fired? Constructive discharge quiz!
- Blog Post|Michael J. Shershin, Jr., March 2, 1936-April 7, 2015
- Analysis|EEOC Proposed Rule on Wellness and the Americans with Disabilities Act – What Employers Need to Know
- Blog Post|Supreme Court hears argument on same-sex marriage
- Blog Post|EEOC transgender case in Detroit will go forward
- Blog Post|Hey - that EEOC wellness rule isn't half bad
- Blog Post|Is telecommuting a reasonable accommodation, or is it not?
- Blog Post|BREAKING!!!! EEOC issues proposed "wellness" regs
- Blog Post|One of EEOC's first transgender lawsuits has settled
- Blog Post|Quickie elections, ASAP!
- Blog Post|New kids on the block!
- Blog Post|A lesson from Twitter sex-bias lawsuit: Post those jobs!
- Blog Post|Pregnancy accommodation FAQs for employers
- Analysis|Pregnancy: Employers’ newest “accommodation obligation”
- Blog Post|BREAKING: FMLA "spousal" rule on hold for now
- Blog Post|Employers may not like NLRB General Counsel report on handbook rules
- Blog Post|Today's SCOTUS pregnancy decision in 1:14
- Blog Post|A conversation about race: The Exciting Conclusion
- Blog Post|Hang tight, employers -- EEOC's proposed Wellness Rule is at the OMB
- Blog Post|A conversation about race
- Blog Post|EMPLOYMENT LAW BLOG CARNIVAL: April Fools' Edition
- Blog Post|What's your workplace retaliation IQ?
- Blog Post|"State of the Union" on substance abuse and the workplace
- Blog Post|The new "us"!
- Blog Post|This 'n' that from the world of the workplace
- Blog Post|New FMLA rule will give rights to same-sex spouses based on "place of celebration"
- Blog Post|Should an employer fight unemployment? The debate continues . . .
- Blog Post|You've exceeded my expectations, Valentine!
- Blog Post|Interview with a juror in Faruqi sex harassment trial
- Blog Post|Faruqi sex harassment trial: it's a wrap!
- Blog Post|Faruqi sex harassment verdict is in! Marchuk wins, to an extent.
- Blog Post|Feb. 3 at Faruqi sex harassment trial: It's up to the jury now
- Blog Post|Employers, don't be caught in the "bogus RIF" trap!
- Blog Post|Jan. 29 at Faruqi sex harassment trial: Your honor, please reconsider!
- Blog Post|Jan. 28 at Faruqi sex harassment trial: The defense rests.
- Blog Post|Jan. 27 at Faruqi trial: No "spoliation" of blood-stained carpet, judge says
- Blog Post|Jan. 26 at the Faruqi sex harassment trial: NSFW!
- Blog Post|Two big sexual harassment cases: where the employers went wrong
- Blog Post|Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., Jan. 15, 1929-April 4, 1968
- Blog Post|BREAKING: Supreme Court will review states' right to ban same-sex marriage
- Blog Post|You've gotta be kidding. THIS is retaliation?
- Blog Post|Two thoughts on the Faruqi sexual harassment trial
- Blog Post|Can courts second-guess the EEOC's conciliation efforts?
- Blog Post|What do employees want? A warm and fuzzy post
- Blog Post|15 for '15: Employment and labor resolutions for the new year
- Blog Post|Year-end employment law roundup -- happy 2015!
- Blog Post|Christmas won't be merry for these employers!
- Blog Post|NLRB Issues Final Rule on Quickie Elections: What employers can expect, and how to prepare
- Blog Post|Happy Chanukah!
- Blog Post|NLRB: Hot for the holidays
- Blog Post|Employment law advice you should never follow
- Blog Post|5 legal traps for the wariest employer
- Blog Post|A few workplace-related things we can be thankful for
- Blog Post|EEOC promises guidance on wellness programs in February
- Blog Post|You love us! You really love us!
- Blog Post|"Weakest link" is no way to run your workplace
- Analysis|Top 10 Technology Blunders for Employers
- Blog Post|Happy Turkey Day from the OFCCP! (not)
- Blog Post|Planning your workplace holiday party? Read this first!
- Blog Post|Will SCOTUS review same-sex marriage now?
- Blog Post|Tuesday's GOP "shellacking" may not change much for employers
- Blog Post|Racial talk at work? Beware of reverse discrimination.
- Blog Post|BREAKING: EEOC seeks court order to halt Honeywell's biometric testing
- Blog Post|Halloween in the workplace? Bah! Humbug!
- Blog Post|LGBT charges are rolling in, EEOC Commissioner says
- Blog Post|Top 10 Technology Blunders for Employers
- Blog Post|Eggs in the workplace
- Blog Post|A reader asks: "Is it me, or has job interviewing become really complicated?"
- Blog Post|An employer should never ask about disability or religion. Except when it should.
- Blog Post|J. Richard Walton, Dec. 13, 1931-Sept. 19, 2014
- Blog Post|Employment law quiz: You be the judge!
- Blog Post|BREAKING: EEOC files first transgender suits against private employers
- Blog Post|The EEOC has been a busy bee this week. (It stings!)
- Blog Post|Off-duty domestic violence -- what's an employer to do?
- Blog Post|9.11.01
- Blog Post|Employers, don't commit these 5 firing faux pas!
- Blog Post|BREAKING: 6th Circuit will rehear Ford telecommuting/reasonable accommodation case
- Blog Post|Some Labor Day eye candy
- Blog Post|Is the EEOC off the rails with this new "wellness" lawsuit? Don't think so.
- Blog Post|Sexy ADA issue: Bad breakup may not justify employer-mandated medical exam
- Blog Post|BREAKING: OFCCP issues directive on gender-identity discrimination
- Blog Post|Teleworker, or teleslacker? Here's how employers can tell the difference.
- Blog Post|The "Dirty Dozen": Top 12 employer harassment mistakes
- Blog Post|You can't fix stupid: Employment law edition
- Blog Post|Sex stereotyping, sexual orientation discrimination, and federal law - crazy-mixed-up right now
- Blog Post|Obama's LGBT Executive Order raises more questions than it answers
- Blog Post|Obama signs LGBT discrimination, affirmative action order
- Blog Post|An in-depth look at the EEOC's new Enforcement Guidance on pregnancy
- Blog Post|Lovic Alton Brooks, Jr. (April 5, 1927-July 14, 2014)
- Analysis|An In-Depth Look at the EEOC's New Enforcement Guidance on Pregnancy Discrimination
- Blog Post|EEOC issues guidance on pregnancy discrimination and accommodation
- Blog Post|Employment law BELIEVE IT OR NOT!
- Blog Post|And That's All She Wrote (Why I write)
- Analysis|Same-Sex Marriage and the FMLA: What Employers Need to Know
- Blog Post|Employment Litigation Lottery: IBM steps away
- Blog Post|Telecommuting as reasonable accommodation? Sure, but not in this case
- Blog Post|Enforce your dress code without making your employees hate you
- Blog Post|10 Easy Rules for Background Checks in Hiring
- Blog Post|The Joy of SOX: What employee activity is "protected"?
- Blog Post|EMPLOYEES: Keeping your settlement confidential is easy, so do it!
- Analysis|Can Your Severance Agreement Survive the EEOC?
- Blog Post|Family and Medical Leave, Doctor's Notes, and Employee Preferences
- Blog Post|Miami Dolphins' culture sure didn't help in Incognito situation
- Blog Post|EMPLOYMENT LAW BLOG CARNIVAL: Black History Month (Music Greats) Edition
- Blog Post|Non-union employers should pay attention to the NLRB - here's why
- Blog Post|In defense of work
- Blog Post|Twitter = How to get fired in 140 characters or less
- Blog Post|Five employer lessons from ADAAA "temporary injury" decision
- Blog Post|Who made this harassment "severe or pervasive"? The horse, of course
- Blog Post|Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., Jan. 15, 1929-April 4, 1968
- Blog Post|Can you be liable for libel based on what you tweet on Twitter? Ask Courtney Love.
- Blog Post|Three workplace lessons from Chris Christie's "Bridgegate"
- Blog Post|2 weird sexual harassment cases, with 8 lessons for employers
- Blog Post|Could Santa Claus really be white? Was Megyn Kelly right? (And to all, a good night.)
- Blog Post|Sometimes you have to fire your "star." Here's why.
- Blog Post|Can a man sue for sexual harassment? Yes. Heck, yes.
- Blog Post|A boring company holiday party? SCANDALOUS!
- Blog Post|Happy Thanksgivukkah! 8 employment law things to be thankful for
- Blog Post|Employee medical exams and the law - how much do you know?
- Blog Post|Thank you, veterans!
- Blog Post|Will the ENDA really become law this time?
- Blog Post|Retail employers: protect against racial profiling charges
- Blog Post|Robert "Jano" Janowitz, 1943-2013
- Blog Post|Boo! Some employment law tricks and treats
- Blog Post|Sexual abuse: Getting your employees to do the right thing
- Blog Post|Unpaid interns and sexual harassment -- how much do you know?
- Blog Post|Hijab accommodation: Will Abercrombie's victory stand?
- Blog Post|Video Interview: Discussing the Government Shutdown with LXBN TV
- Blog Post|Shutdown contingency plans
- Blog Post|"Voluntary" wellness programs -- seeking answers from the EEOC
- Blog Post|John Steven Warren, July 15, 1950-September 22, 2013
- Blog Post|The gender pay gap will not go away in the future.
- Blog Post|Employment law app - check it out!
- Blog Post|Employment law triple play: Islam and "the Look," loose tweets, Gaga
- Blog Post|NLRB app review: Not perfect, but not half bad.
- Blog Post|Woman fired for being "old and ugly" -- and a win for the EEOC
- Blog Post|Retaliation Quiz, and the scorned associate who's getting a jury trial
- Blog Post|10 lessons from the EEOC's spanking in the Freeman "disparate impact" case
- Blog Post|Four reasons to be careful about contingent workers
- Blog Post|Should the taxpayers of San Diego pay Filner's legal fees in his sexual harassment case?
- Blog Post|Workers in "The Twilight Zone" -- should you offer them harassment training?
- Blog Post|If you want to win your retaliation case, don't be a donkey.
- Blog Post|Employment Law Blog Carnival: 1950's Summer Road Trip Edition
- Blog Post|No retaliation case unless it's "the" motive, not just "a" motive, SCOTUS says
- Blog Post|Happy Fourth! When it comes to liability for workplace harassment, SCOTUS says not just anybody is a "supervisor"
- Blog Post|Supremes' DOMA decision may simplify some spousal FMLA administration
- Blog Post|Employment law in the news: Lightning round
- Blog Post|Is your reason for termination honest, logical, and complete? If not, you may get a scary result in your discrimination case
- Blog Post|Moms rule in lactation, pregnancy, and health insurance challenges
- Blog Post|Are these medical questions illegal, or not? Test your knowledge!
- Blog Post|Employees: Better think twice before suing your employer (four reasons why)
- Blog Post|Four reasons your employment lawyer thinks firing should be a last resort
- Blog Post|Should these employees have been terminated? Tell us what you think!
- Blog Post|Is your company a target of the EEOC?
- Blog Post|Workplace Violence, Part 2: Crisis management tips for employers
- Blog Post|Workplace Violence: Some things an employer can do
- Blog Post|"Looks" discrimination can be a problem even if you're in retail, fashion, or marketing
- Blog Post|Five snips on workplace harassment (plus a bonus)
- Blog Post|The one thing an employer can do to prevent pay equity claims that's easy, cheap, and doesn't involve lawyers.
- Blog Post|OK, the pay gap is mostly bogus -- but what about the rest of it?
- Blog Post|Pay gap? Yes. Discrimination? Rarely.
- Blog Post|WOO-HOO! New FMLA regs take effect today. Here's all you need.
- Blog Post|It's time to fix the Family and Medical Leave Act -- here are some suggestions.
- Blog Post|I'll be darned! Court finds that random alcohol tests don't always violate the ADA.
- Blog Post|"Too much information" can get you fired!
- Blog Post|No Grammy for Lady Gaga's deposition performance in overtime lawsuit
- Blog Post|BREAKING: DOL issues Final Rule on FMLA to address military, aviation amendments . . . and other things
- Blog Post|Has success spoiled Sheryl Sandberg?
- Blog Post|Employer's Bane: Unpredictable FMLA leave. Is there a solution?
- Blog Post|BREAKING: D.C. Circuit strikes down Obama's "recess appointments" to NLRB
- Blog Post|Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., January 15, 1929-April 4, 1968
- Blog Post|Sex, lawyers, and "independent contractor versus employee" -- believe it or not!
- Blog Post|Video interview: discussing veganism as a "religion" with LXBN TV
- Blog Post|Employers shouldn't be too excited about that pregnancy decision . . . and more from The Price Is Right
- Blog Post|3 employer bummers: Veganism a "religion," ADA interactive process fails, and costly severance mistake
- Blog Post|Post-apocalypse (well, post-vacation, anyway) employment law roundup
- Blog Post|Peace on earth . . . and in the workplace
- Blog Post|EEOC approves Strategic Enforcement Plan, adds equal pay to list of priorities
- Blog Post|Michael Sean Lavenant, June 4, 1970-December 12, 2012
- Blog Post|Holidays in the workplace: Listen to Bad Santa, and do precisely the opposite
- Blog Post|Employers, don't let that "protected" employee hold you hostage.
- Blog Post|10 rules of etiquette that will save you from a pregnancy discrimination suit
- Blog Post|An old-fashioned, labor and employment Thanksgiving
- Blog Post|Five reasons why every employer CAN afford harassment training
- Blog Post|Obama 2.0: What employers can expect to see in the next four years
- Blog Post|Eau de humanity, part deux: Employer wins ADA fragrance case
- Blog Post|The horror! Nine things employers say that spook their lawyers
- Blog Post|POLITICS AT WORK: Employer Dos, Don'ts, and Be Very, Very Carefuls
- Blog Post|If you hire only people you have the hots for, is that sex discrimination?
- Blog Post|Roundup of Supreme Court employment cases -- right here!
- Blog Post|Face the Bloggers: Best of the best around the 'net
- Blog Post|Face the Bloggers: Employment and labor questions for the candidates (Ryan)
- Blog Post|Face the Bloggers: Employment and labor questions for the candidates (Biden)
- Blog Post|Face the Bloggers: Employment and labor questions for the candidates (Romney)
- Blog Post|Face the Bloggers: Employment and labor questions for the candidates (Obama)
- Blog Post|USDA Grade F: The dumbest sexual harassment case evah!
- Blog Post|This just in: September Blog Carnival is up!
- Blog Post|In light of NLRB ethics probe, is Walmart social media policy still ok?
- Blog Post|Employers, here's how you can make sure that legal meds aren't affecting your employees' safety on the job.
- Blog Post|"Minimally qualified" usually get preference if they're disabled, court says
- Blog Post|One word on political discussions at work: Shhh.
- Blog Post|EEOC's "emerging issues": LGBT rights, and accommodations for pregnant women
- Blog Post|Employers, don't let your employees use the "M" word -- it may be harassment.
- Blog Post|"I'm Robin Shea, and I approved this message."
- Blog Post|An employer's nightmare: the anonymous harasser
- Blog Post|Phyllis Diller on the latest in labor and employment
- Blog Post|Wellness "sticks," as well as "carrots," are legal, court says
- Blog Post|Got an appearance code? Make sure you allow exceptions for religion.
- Blog Post|Eau, de humanity! Better watch those fragrances if they make your employee sick.
- Blog Post|Will the Chick-fil-A YouTube firing pass legal muster?
- Blog Post|Five sure-fire ways to get an age-based harassment complaint
- Blog Post|Lewd conduct, lactation accommodation, and other steaming hot employment law news!
- Blog Post|Is obesity a disability under the new ADA? Probably.
- Blog Post|5 reasonable accommodations an employer almost never has to make
- Blog Post|5 reasonable accommodations an employer never dreamed it would have to make
- Blog Post|A work-life balance audit for employers
- Blog Post|Special Report: A quick and dirty on this week's "drug rep" overtime decision . . . and why all employers should be pleased
- Blog Post|Did you libel your employee in a panic and then find out you were wrong? Never be afraid to say you're sorry.
- Blog Post|The NLRB's Dos and Don'ts for employer social media policies
- Blog Post|Employment and Labor Roundup: Defense of Marriage Act decision, drugs, NLRB update, and more!
- Blog Post|Up in smoke: Hopes of ADA protection for medical marijuana use are dashed . . . for now, anyway
- Blog Post|Religious employers, the ministerial exception and single moms -- again!
- Blog Post|When can an employer fire an employee for medical leave fraud?
- Blog Post|On retreat -- back next Friday
- Blog Post|"Hey, Jackie, can we talk?" The EEOC's Enforcement Guidance on criminal background information
- Blog Post|What employers with international operations can learn from Secret Service sex scandal
- Blog Post|Can an employer insist on regular attendance without violating the ADA? Maybe.
- Blog Post|Religious employers, the ministerial exception, and pregnant women
- Blog Post|Temporary outage - we apologize
- Blog Post|You may know where the bodies are buried, but that doesn't mean you can sue your employer for retaliation
- Blog Post|If your job makes you want to kill yourself, you may (or may not) be an ADA "direct threat"
- Blog Post|Do you have a gender-based pay gap? If so, you'll have some explaining to do
- Blog Post|Don't be a twerp when you tweet
- Blog Post|White guys need love too: Punitive damages and reverse discrimination
- Blog Post|EEOC's Strategic Plan and 5 tips for employers seeking a good mediation
- Blog Post|By George! Here's an angle on NLRB/social media that I bet you haven't thought of
- Blog Post|A few labor and employment gems I got this week
- Blog Post|A Valentine's Day bouquet of sexual harassment cases
- Blog Post|NLRB and social media: A hard line, to be sure, but all is not lost for employers
- Blog Post|Retaliation Redux: Two cases that should scare employers a lot
- Blog Post|Employers, you might (or might not) be liable for retaliation if . . .
- Blog Post|OFF-CLOCK WORK: "Flintstone" laws in a "Buck Rogers" world
- Blog Post|Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., January 15, 1929-April 4, 1968
- Blog Post|EMPLOYMENT LAW BLOG CARNIVAL, Chinese New Year Edition
- Blog Post|This week in labor and employment law - Marx Brothers Edition
- Blog Post|Employment law leftovers: Best of 2011, what's up for 2012, and resolutions
- Blog Post|Happy *hic* New Year! 2011 labor and employment law year in review
- Blog Post|Gone a' Wassailing
- Blog Post|Don't let that employee probationary period lull you into a false sense of security
- Blog Post|10 reasons for employers to be jolly about the ADA (says the EEOC)
- Blog Post|Thanks for getting us on the ABA Blawg 100 list! You guys rule!
- Blog Post|10 things an employment lawyer never wants to hear
- Blog Post|Employment law cornucopia - happy Thanksgiving!
- Blog Post|If you can, give your employees a rest for Thanksgiving
- Blog Post|5 signs that you'll lose your sexual harassment case
- Blog Post|"A closed mouth gathers no feet": What Herman Cain teaches employers about sexual harassment
- Blog Post|Why do we hate us? Women prefer working for men, study says
- Blog Post|PHYSICIAN, HEAL THYSELF! Good lessons for employers from AMA case
- Blog Post|5 reasons for employers to "hold their fire" on dismissal of employment suits
- Blog Post|Employers, don't try to dismiss that lawsuit before its time.
- Blog Post|Employers, don't be overzealous with your wellness. Beware of the ADA and everything else.
- Blog Post|Employers, don't be too quick to take that IRS "independent contractor" deal
- Blog Post|Thank you! Gracias! Merci! Danke! Arigato! Grazie! Spasiba! Xie xie!
- Blog Post|Staking out the EEOC and its wave of ADA suits against employers
- Blog Post|11 Employer FAQs (No. 11): Are pregnant employees entitled to reasonable accommodation?
- Blog Post|Employer FAQs (No. 10): How can I guarantee that I'll get a sexual harassment suit?
- Blog Post|11 Employer FAQs (No. 8): May I send an employee to our doctor to verify the need for a reasonable accommodation?
- Blog Post|11 Employer FAQs (No. 9): When must I pay a non-exempt employee for travel time?
- Blog Post|11 Employer FAQs (No. 6): We don't have a union. Do I still have to display that new NLRB poster?
- Blog Post|11 Employer FAQs (No. 7): Should the "ugly" be protected from discrimination?
- Blog Post|11 Employer FAQs (No. 5): Is there any difference between light duty and reasonable accommodation?
- Blog Post|11 Employer FAQs: (No. 4): Should I offer harassment training to rank-and-file employees? Isn't that just asking for trouble?
- Blog Post|11 Employer FAQs (No. 3): When do I have to start saving electronic evidence?
- Blog Post|11 Employer FAQs: (No. 2) "What does 'right to work' mean?"
- Blog Post|11 Employer FAQs: (No. 1) What exactly is this "interactive process" we hear so much about?
- Blog Post|Vote for me, and all your wildest dreams will come true.*
- Blog Post|Tweet freely! Employers get some guidance about social media
- Blog Post|To guarantee an employment lawsuit, just follow these five "worst practices"
- Blog Post|5 egregious errors that endanger employment investigations
- Blog Post|Is it ok under the ADA and the GINA to offer wellness incentives? The EEOC explains it all for you
- Blog Post|Employment Law Roundup: Facebook wage rant, EEOC scores again, FMLA bereavement leave, gender gap narrows, Menorah House and the Sabbath, mini-horse as accommodation
- Blog Post|No-Fault Attendance? In light of the EEOC/Verizon settlement, what's the point?
- Blog Post|Accused of sexual harassment? That's bad, but don't make it worse.
- Blog Post|6 ways to avoid being the EEOC's next hiring "test case"
- Blog Post|Thanks, Supremes! Wal-Mart v. Dukes roundup
- Blog Post|GOOD RIDDANCE! Just what can you say about that ex-employee of yours?
- Blog Post|The EEOC's 5 warnings about medical leaves and the ADA
- Blog Post|5 signs that your sexual harassment case may be a dog
- Blog Post|Employment law roundup: Do sexy immigrants who E-verify on Facebook cause obesity?
- Blog Post|9 signs that you'll lose your age discrimination case
- Blog Post|The ADAAA, the ADA, and the Genetic Information Non-Discrimination Act
- Blog Post|THAT STINKS! Greedy lawyers, toxic employees, heavy-handed government, and other bad things
- Blog Post|The Fallacious Five: Employment law misconceptions that trip up employers
- Blog Post|What do Will & Kate, "birthers," and ADAAA/FMLA coordination have in common? Nothing, really.
- Blog Post|Little lies employers tell . . . and why they shouldn't
- Blog Post|Religion in the Workplace: 5 Devilish Employer Mistakes
- Blog Post|Oh, the humanity! Stupidity rules in social media and employment
- Blog Post|New ADAAA regs: the untold story!!!
- Blog Post|5 Ways Employers Make Plaintiffs' Lawyers Very, Very Happy
- Blog Post|What's smart and what's legal don't always match
- Blog Post|Charity begins at home . . . and ought to stay there most of the time
- Blog Post|"Notorious Nine" mistakes by employers in dealing with the EEOC
- Blog Post|Workplace (aka "fake") spouses -- a lot of hype, but here's how to avoid problems.
- Blog Post|Doctor's note for all sick calls? Here are 5 reasons I wouldn't.
- Blog Post|BOO! NLRB "Facebook Firing" case settles
- Blog Post|Equal-opportunity harassers, dirty old men, retaliation, and the "gender gap" on Wikipedia: pressing legal issues of the day
- Blog Post|Is age discrimination running rampant, or is there another explanation?
- Blog Post|Employment plaintiffs' bizarro world
- Blog Post|Racial epithets and reverse discrimination: Who is allowed to say the "N" word?
- Blog Post|"We're gonna regulate your tie morphology, and you can't stop us!"
- Blog Post|Employment lawyer at the movies: What if "Miracle on 34th Street" happened today?
- Blog Post|REASON FLAILS: Bosses behaving badly (allegedly)
- Blog Post|BIG LIES: "The check's in the mail," and "I can fire you for a good, bad, or no reason"
- Blog Post|Would harassment prevention have saved TSA from its PR nosedive?
- Blog Post|"Use Good Judgment" and "Follow the Golden Rule" just don't cut it in today's legal climate
- Blog Post|Does cussing create a "hostile work environment"?
- Blog Post|How to Survive the ADAAA: Seven Best Practices for Employers
- Blog Post|ADAAA litigation "goes live."
- Blog Post|Plan/Prevent/Protect: "Affirmative Action for Everybody!"
Constangy Streaming
- Leigh E. Tyson, Partner - Atlanta, GARobin E. Shea, Of Counsel & Chief Legal Editor - Winston-Salem, NC
Professional & Civic Associations
Civic
- St. Leo the Great Catholic Church
Professional
- North Carolina Bar Association, Labor and Employment Law Section
- Professionalism Committee Chair (2006-2008)
- Professionalism Committee (2004-2011)
- Continuing Legal Education Committee (2005-2009)
- Society for Human Resources Management
Services
Admissions
- North Carolina, 1988
U.S. Supreme Court
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
U.S. District Court - MI - E.D.
U.S. District Court - NC - E.D., M.D., W.D. - NOTE: As of November 1, 2025, Robin is not handling litigation matters.
"Do not wish to be anything but what you are, and try to be that perfectly."
St. Francis de Sales



