EEOC performance in FY 2016: Is the Agency "mellowing"?

Was the EEOC more laid-back this past fiscal year than it was in FY15?

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission issued its Fiscal Year 2016 Performance Report this week (here's the press release, in case you don't want to read all 104 pages of the report), and the agency seems to have slowed down a bit, as compared with the prior year.

(The EEOC's fiscal year runs from October 1 through September 30.)

A kinder, gentler EEOC could be good news for employers. However, the lower numbers could also mean that the Agency is focusing more on the quality of its lawsuits than the quantity. The only thing worse than having to defend a frivolous lawsuit is having to defend one that isn't frivolous. So, maybe not so good, and bad if you happen to be the employer with the case that the EEOC considers "litigation-quality."

The EEOC promises that more precise statistics will be coming soon, but here is what they've reported so far that allows us to make a meaningful comparison of the two years.

There were quite a few more charges filed in FY 2016 versus FY 2015. So far, so bad.

Huh. Less money through mediation, conciliation, and other settlements in FY 2016, even though there were more charges. Maybe that means the EEOC was more willing to take employers to court?

Guess not. There was a significant decrease in the number of "merits-based" lawsuits filed in FY 2016. But maybe the EEOC was picking really good ones that would allow it to recover large amounts in court.

So much for that theory.

One other point that is important to note -- these declines are all pre-election. No telling what will happen by the end of FY 2017, after Donald Trump has been in office for about eight months.

EEOC Commissioner Victoria Lipnic spoke at a Bar Association meeting that I attended in October -- before these numbers were released -- and she said that in 2010 the EEOC was filing approximately 400 lawsuits a year. She could not explain why there was such a dramatic decline in recent years but said that the EEOC lawyers would attribute it to a more aggressive defense bar. Heh.

Commissioner Lipnic, who is a Republican and was U.S. Assistant Secretary of Labor for Employment Standards under President George W. Bush (and whose name has been floated as a possible Secretary of Labor in the Trump Administration), could be expected to have some disagreements with the general strategy of the current EEOC, and she does. As it relates to litigation, she told us that she believed the Commissioners should review EEOC lawsuits before they are filed to ensure that the lawsuits are meritorious.

Is "better quality" and "picking one's battles" what's going on here? I look forward to getting the rest of the charge-filing statistics when they are available so that we can make a better assessment.

  • Smiling older woman with short gray hair and glasses, wearing a dark gray cardigan over a black top and a beaded necklace, with arms confidently crossed. She has a warm, approachable demeanor and a professional presence against a transparent background.
    Of Counsel & Chief Legal Editor

    Robin also conducts internal investigations and delivers training for HR professionals, managers, and employees on topics such as harassment prevention, disability accommodation, and leave management.

    Robin is editor in chief ...

This is Constangy’s flagship law blog, founded in 2010 by Robin Shea, who is chief legal editor and a regular contributor. This nationally recognized blog also features posts from other Constangy attorneys in the areas of immigration, labor relations, and sports law, keeping HR professionals and employers informed about the latest legal trends.

Search

Get Updates By Email

Subscribe

Archives

Legal Influencer Lexology Badge ABA Web 100 Badge
Jump to Page

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When using this website, Constangy and certain third parties may collect and use cookies or similar technologies to enhance your experience. These technologies may collect information about your device, activity on our website, and preferences. Some cookies are essential to site functionality, while others help us analyze performance and usage trends to improve our content and features.

Please note that if you return to this website from a different browser or device, you may need to reselect your cookie preferences.

For more information about our privacy practices, including your rights and choices, please see our Privacy Policy. 

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Strictly Necessary Cookies are essential for the website to function, and cannot be turned off. We use this type of cookie for purposes such as security, network management, and accessibility. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but if you do so, some parts of the site will not work. 

Functionality Cookies

Always Active

Functionality Cookies are used to enhance the functionality and personalization of this website. These cookies support features like embedded content (such as video or audio), keyword search highlighting, and remembering your preferences across pages—for example, your cookie choices or form inputs during submission.

Some of these cookies are managed by third-party service providers whose features are embedded on our site. These cookies do not store personal information and are necessary for certain site features to work properly.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek