A ho-hum EEOC strategic plan? Maybe that's not so bad.

Not a lot to the EEOC's 2018-22 Strategic Enforcement Plan, but that might be good for employers.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission recently released its Strategic Enforcement Plan for 2018-2022.

During the Obama Administration, employers and their lawyers waited for the latest SEP with trepidation. Each SEP would have us girding our loins for whatever creative legal theories the Agency planned to aggressively pursue against employers in the coming years.

This year, the SEP left me yawning. 

The five-commissioner agency has had only three commissioners since last summer, and it's been without a "regular" chair since shortly after President Trump took office. (Republican Victoria Lipnic has been acting chair.) The President's two nominees, Janet Dhillon and Daniel Gade, have been waiting . . . and waiting . . . and waiting for a Senate confirmation vote. In fact, their nominations were pending for so long that the nominations were ready to expire, but Senate Democrats agreed to consider them in 2018 without requiring the President to re-nominate them. (Chai Feldblum, a Democrat and current Commissioner, has also been nominated for another term.)

With all of these nominations up in the air, it's not surprising that the Agency's SEP is somewhat noncommittal.  But if you read it closely (and between the lines a bit), I think you'll find that it's overall good for employers. Here are some highlights:

  • The EEOC will continue to focus on charges where systemic discrimination appears to exist.
  • The EEOC will pay more attention to discrimination in federal government employment. (Less scrutiny of private sector employers?)
  • In cases where "reasonable cause" is found, the Agency will put more emphasis on non-monetary relief "which explicitly addresses the discriminatory employment practices at issue in the case" and "provides remedies to the aggrieved individuals or prevents similar violations in the future." The examples given in the SEP include training, policy development, "and external monitoring of employer actions, as appropriate." (More training, less money? I can live with that.)
  • The Agency will pursue litigation "responsibly," focusing on cases where it has a reasonable chance of success -- either through a "win," or through a consent decree or settlement. ("Responsibly" usually means "in moderation." As in, "Drink Responsibly.")
  • The Agency will continue to provide outreach and technical support, but especially to small businesses and new businesses. (More empathy for problems faced by small and new businesses?) From the employee side, it will focus on "particularly vulnerable communities that may be unfamiliar with our laws," including people who are new to the workforce (teenagers, I assume), and immigrants.
  • The Agency will beef up its social media presence and its use of technology in general. (The EEOC's website looks great . . . or would, if this were 1999.)
  • The agency will focus on getting its own house in order, by assessing its own "employee engagement and inclusiveness." (Less time for the rest of us?)

No drama. I like it!

  • Smiling older woman with short gray hair and glasses, wearing a dark gray cardigan over a black top and a beaded necklace, with arms confidently crossed. She has a warm, approachable demeanor and a professional presence against a transparent background.
    Of Counsel & Chief Legal Editor

    Robin also conducts internal investigations and delivers training for HR professionals, managers, and employees on topics such as harassment prevention, disability accommodation, and leave management.

    Robin is editor in chief ...

This is Constangy’s flagship law blog, founded in 2010 by Robin Shea, who is chief legal editor and a regular contributor. This nationally recognized blog also features posts from other Constangy attorneys in the areas of immigration, labor relations, and sports law, keeping HR professionals and employers informed about the latest legal trends.

Search

Get Updates By Email

Subscribe

Archives

Legal Influencer Lexology Badge ABA Web 100 Badge
Jump to Page

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When using this website, Constangy and certain third parties may collect and use cookies or similar technologies to enhance your experience. These technologies may collect information about your device, activity on our website, and preferences. Some cookies are essential to site functionality, while others help us analyze performance and usage trends to improve our content and features.

Please note that if you return to this website from a different browser or device, you may need to reselect your cookie preferences.

For more information about our privacy practices, including your rights and choices, please see our Privacy Policy. 

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Strictly Necessary Cookies are essential for the website to function, and cannot be turned off. We use this type of cookie for purposes such as security, network management, and accessibility. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but if you do so, some parts of the site will not work. 

Functionality Cookies

Always Active

Functionality Cookies are used to enhance the functionality and personalization of this website. These cookies support features like embedded content (such as video or audio), keyword search highlighting, and remembering your preferences across pages—for example, your cookie choices or form inputs during submission.

Some of these cookies are managed by third-party service providers whose features are embedded on our site. These cookies do not store personal information and are necessary for certain site features to work properly.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek