Should Rebekah Jones' arrest record be an issue? UPDATED 5/26/20.
The administration of Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) recently fired Rebekah Jones, who was either the genius behind, or the data-input clerk for, the state's coronavirus dashboard. News reports say that Ms. Jones is still employed by the state and has until next week to accept or reject a separation agreement.
Ms. Jones is either a brilliant scientist who created the dashboard and was terminated for her single-minded pursuit of the truth about Florida's coronavirus statistics, or she is a low-level database manager who had a grossly inflated opinion of herself and insubordinately refused to comply with her bosses' reasonable requests on numerous occasions.
I won't get into that, or the merits of Ms. Jones' termination, because the story is completely different depending on which news source you are reading. Unlike them, this blog is non-partisan. :-) And if Ms. Jones accepts a separation agreement, we'll probably never know the real story.
But what I would like to talk about is the Governor's reference to Ms. Jones' arrest record. When asked about the termination during a press conference this week, the Governor said that, in addition to being insubordinate, Ms. Jones had a criminal record and should never have been hired in the first place.
DeSantis also pointed out that Jones had been facing criminal charges for stalking last summer. That case is pending. Two other charges of cyberstalking and cyber sexual harassment were dropped. Court records show the charges stemmed from a romantic relationship that turned bad.
“So I’ve asked the Department of Health to explain to me how someone would be allowed to be charged with that and continue on because this was many months ago. I have a zero-tolerance policy for sexual harassment. So her supervisor dismissed her because of a lot of those reasons and it was a totally valid way. But she should have been dismissed long before that,” [Gov. DeSantis] said.
Politics ain't beanbag, but was it cool of the Governor to publicly disclose criminal charges against a soon-to-be-ex employee, some of which had not gone to trial and some of which have been dropped or dismissed?
My vote is, Not cool.
I'm not siding with Ms. Jones, but here's what I'd say about the disclosure of her criminal background information:
First, these are arrest records. It doesn't appear that Ms. Jones has been convicted of anything -- at least, not yet. And I thought employers were supposed to give employees the benefit of the doubt on their arrest records unless the arrest was for a particularly egregious crime (like terrorism), or only the latest chapter in a pattern of crime, or a crime that put the organization at risk (like embezzlement, when the employee is the employer's Chief Money Handler).
Second, it appears that most (not all, as CBS4 initially reported) of the arrests stemmed a relationship that went bad. That isn't good, but domestic disputes may not always have a high risk of carrying over into the workplace.
(I did read somewhere -- must have been a right-wing site -- that the person Ms. Jones allegedly harassed was a university student she was mentoring and had had a sexual relationship with. Definitely not cool, and if she would do that, she could have broader "boundary issues" at work, which could carry over into her state government job. She also reportedly got arrested once when she was working at Louisiana State University in the Human Resources Department -- and it was HR who called the cops. If these reports are correct, there is some "smoke" here.)
UPDATE (5/26/20): Whoa.
Third, she hasn't pled to or been convicted of anything that I know about. Maybe her ex-boyfriend is being vindictive by filing lots of frivolous criminal charges against her. Isn't that a reason to wait for a plea or a conviction before acting on a criminal record?
Fourth, she wasn't fired because of her criminal record. She was fired either for whistleblowing (says the left) or insubordination (says the right). So, why get into her arrest record at all?
I don't think Ms. Jones has been defamed, but I'd be a lot more interested in hearing the state's full explanation of what she did that was considered insubordinate and why her boss instructed her to temporarily remove some of the data from the dashboard for about a day -- right around the same time that the media was asking whether Florida had manipulated its coronavirus statistics to support a reopening.
(And, yes, there could be a perfectly legitimate reason for this. The state epidemiologist may have needed to review the data so that she could verify it before responding to the media inquiries.)
I'd also like to know whether the data in the column in question were actually wrong. Even if wrong, I'd like to know whether that was a "no harm, no foul" mistake (in other words, a mistake that didn't affect the overall conclusion that reopening has been good for Florida). I could have missed it, but I haven't seen anyone report on this, even though at least one media outlet says it captured the original data before it was taken down. Also, I think the missing column was reinstated after one day.
In which case, the reference to Ms. Jones's arrest record seems gratuitous and a distraction from what could be a winning issue for the Governor.
But I'm talking like an employment lawyer. And Ms. Jones will probably accept the severance agreement, and that will be that.
Off-topic: Whatever phase of reopening you're in this weekend (we're starting Phase 2 today -- hair salon, here I come, and not a minute too soon!), I wish you all a very happy Memorial Day weekend!
Image Credits: Both from flickr, Creative Commons license. Game of bean bag (or cornhole) by David Fulmer, photo of Gov. DeSantis by South Florida Water Management District.
- Partner
Robin has more than 30 years' experience counseling employers and representing them before government agencies and in employment litigation involving Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with ...
Robin Shea has 30 years' experience in employment litigation, including Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act (including the Amendments Act).
Continue Reading
Subscribe
Contributors
- William A. "Zan" Blue, Jr.
- Obasi Bryant
- Kenneth P. Carlson, Jr.
- James M. Coleman
- Cara Yates Crotty
- Lara C. de Leon
- Christopher R. Deubert
- Joyce M. Dos Santos
- Colin Finnegan
- Steven B. Katz
- Ellen C. Kearns
- F. Damon Kitchen
- David C. Kurtz
- Angelique Groza Lyons
- John E. MacDonald
- Alyssa K. Peters
- Sarah M. Phaff
- David P. Phippen
- William K. Principe
- Sabrina M. Punia-Ly
- Angela L. Rapko
- Rachael Rustmann
- Paul Ryan
- Piyumi M. Samaratunga
- Robin E. Shea
- Kristine Marie Sims
- David L. Smith
- Jill S. Stricklin
- Jack R. Wallace
Archives
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010