In tough economic times, harassment training tends to be viewed as a luxury that can be gone without until things get better.
I understand this thinking, but harassment training on a regular basis is never a "luxury." It's a "cost of doing business." That is the reality. Here are five reasons why:
"Don't be 'cheep' about your harassment training. (tehe - get it?)"
*Turnover. If it's been, say, five years since you last had harassment training, that means you have a whole bunch of employees who have never had it -- at least, not with your company. If you don't offer harassment training on a regular basis, how are you going to prove that your newer employees knew what behavior to avoid, or what to do if they were victimized? ANSWER: You won't.
"Eating cake is a luxury, mon cherie, but not le harassment training!"
*Evolving law and social conditions. There have not been radical changes in harassment law for a long time, but there has been evolution that makes a program only a few years old seem naive and even quaint. Looking back at my older programs, they were very focused on "traditional" scenarios involving straight men and women telling dirty jokes and having extramarital affairs that went wrong, like General Petraeus and Paula Broadwell.
Now, the courts nationwide have recognized certain types of same-sex harassment as a form of "gender stereotyping" that violates Title VII, and many states have laws prohibiting "LGBT" discrimination, so we spend a lot more time on that subject than we used to. We also place more emphasis now on harassment based on race, national origin, religion, age, and disability. Over the years, the EEOC has placed increasing emphasis on retaliation, so we spend a lot of time on that. We talk more about the emerging issue of "bullying" now. Not to mention misuse of the internet and social media, which we were barely even thinking about a few years ago.
All of which means, if you have had a long hiatus from harassment training, your training will not be current, and you could be at risk for claims based on newer, "hipper," more modern forms of harassment.
"Thousands of pairs of shoes? Extravagant. Annual harassment training? Priceless."
*People forget. Even if you had bang-up, Cadillac Escalade-level harassment training three years ago, I can guarantee that everyone who was in that class has forgotten something important. You know it's true. And I'm talking only about the people who attended the training, of course -- the newer hires haven't heard anything that they can forget.
*It may be legally required, depending on where you live. Some states, including California, require employers to provide harassment training to management. If you're in one of these states, you cannot postpone training. It's the law.
Please take a minute and visit Eric Meyer's The Employer Handbook, which was host this week to the November edition of the Employment Law Blog Carnival. My post from last week about Obama 2.0 is featured there, as well as some great stuff from other employment law and HR bloggers. Thank you, Eric!
*It's expensive . . . until you get sued, and then in hindsight it was a steal. Yes, any harassment training costs money. You may think you don't have the money to spare, and I am sure you are right. But the legal fees to defend an EEOC charge will almost always exceed the cost of the training, and if you get a lawsuit, they will definitely exceed it big-time. Legal fees to get to summary judgment may run you about $50,000 or more, depending on where you live and the complexity of the case. If you don't get summary judgment and have to go to trial, your attorneys' fees may be more like $100,000, not including the plaintiff's attorneys' fees, which she is entitled to recover if she wins. And, of course, not including her award if she wins, which you will have to pay. And, as Chrysler found out, could be substantial.
"It may be a sin to have gold-plated plumbing in your bathroom *sob* and an air-conditioned dog mansion *sob*, but it's no sin to be current on your harassment training!"
Four-point-five million dollars? That harassment training just got real cheap, didn't it?
Seriously! One of the first things you'll be asked by the EEOC or a plaintiff's attorney is how recently you conducted harassment training and whether the parties involved in the case (the alleged victim, the accused, and any witnesses, as well as the people who investigated) attended. If you can say, "Oh, yes, we had training just six months before this all came about, and here are the attendance sheets showing that everyone completed the training," then that is good. In fact, that may provide you with a complete defense to the harassment claim. Wouldn't that be nice?
But sometimes what happens is that the rank-and-file employees testify truthfully that they don't even know what "harassment" is, and the managers "don't recall" the last time they had training because it was, in fact, last conducted before they were born.
Interested in seeing a sample of an interactive, computer-based harassment training program? Here is a "Petraeus-like" segment from a program that my law firm offers.
The cost of harassment training should never be an obstacle to an employer. Many law firms (including my own) and Human Resources consultants and employers' associations will do harassment training on a flat-fee basis so that you can plan for the expense with no surprises. You may have in-house counsel who is capable of doing the training, and if so, even better -- in that event, you don't have to pay anything extra for the training. If your turnover is too high to make "live" training practical, or if your employees are scattered to the four winds so that bringing them to a single location for live training isn't practical, you can go with a computer-based interactive program, a video-workbook combination, or even just a passive videotape (not as good because it isn't interactive, but definitely better than nothing). You can use some combination of these -- for example, by having live training once a year for management, and computer or video training for new-employee orientations in the interim. The possibilities are endless!
PLEASE NOTE: Having regular, current, high-quality harassment training is not a guarantee that you won't get a harassment charge or lawsuit, and it's certainly no guarantee that you will win. But our experience has been that employers who keep up with their training achieve a real benefit from it because employees are encouraged to speak up early, which allows the company to resolve the complaint internally before irreparable damage occurs. And courts have recognized effective training as an element of an employer's defense to some types of harassment cases.
Robert Burton and Benjamin Franklin approved this message!
FYI, next week, in honor of Thanksgiving, my "Friday" post will be up on Wednesday.
- Partner
Robin has more than 30 years' experience counseling employers and representing them before government agencies and in employment litigation involving Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with ...
Robin Shea has 30 years' experience in employment litigation, including Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act (including the Amendments Act).
Continue Reading
Subscribe
Contributors
- William A. "Zan" Blue, Jr.
- Obasi Bryant
- Kenneth P. Carlson, Jr.
- James M. Coleman
- Cara Yates Crotty
- Lara C. de Leon
- Christopher R. Deubert
- Joyce M. Dos Santos
- Colin Finnegan
- Steven B. Katz
- Ellen C. Kearns
- F. Damon Kitchen
- David C. Kurtz
- Angelique Groza Lyons
- John E. MacDonald
- Alyssa K. Peters
- Sarah M. Phaff
- David P. Phippen
- William K. Principe
- Sabrina M. Punia-Ly
- Angela L. Rapko
- Rachael Rustmann
- Paul Ryan
- Robin E. Shea
- Kristine Marie Sims
- David L. Smith
- Jill S. Stricklin
- Jack R. Wallace
Archives
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010