NYC expected to ban marijuana tests to weed out job applicants

Pre-employment marijuana testing would become a "discriminatory act."

On April 9, the New York City Council passed a bill that restricts employers from requiring job applicants to undergo testing for the presence of THC, the chemical compound in marijuana that causes one to feel “high.” If, as expected, Mayor Bill De Blasio signs the bill into law, the NYC Human Rights Law will be amended to make pre-employment marijuana testing a discriminatory act.

The law would not apply to the following safety-sensitive positions:

  • Law enforcement positions
  • Laborers, mechanics, workers, contractors, or other persons working on a public work site
  • Any position that requires compliance with the NYC Building Code
  • Any position that requires a commercial driver's license
  • Any position requiring one to supervise children, medical patients, or other vulnerable persons, or
  • Any position that could significantly affect the health or safety of employees or members of the public, as determined by the Department of Citywide Administrative Services or in regulations issued by the NYC Commission on Human Rights. 

Nor would the law apply to pre-employment marijuana testing conducted in accordance with

  • Federal, state, and local transportation department regulations
  • Federal government contracts or grants
  • Federal or state statutes, or
  • Collective bargaining agreements.

After the Mayor signs the bill, assuming he does, it will take effect one year later. Companies with New York City employees would need to modify their drug-testing policies before the effective date to comply with the law.

We will keep you up to date on all developments.


This is Constangy’s flagship law blog, founded in 2010 by Robin Shea, who is chief legal editor and a regular contributor. This nationally recognized blog also features posts from other Constangy attorneys in the areas of immigration, labor relations, and sports law, keeping HR professionals and employers informed about the latest legal trends.

Search

Get Updates By Email

Subscribe

Archives

Legal Influencer Lexology Badge ABA Web 100 Badge
Jump to Page

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When using this website, Constangy and certain third parties may collect and use cookies or similar technologies to enhance your experience. These technologies may collect information about your device, activity on our website, and preferences. Some cookies are essential to site functionality, while others help us analyze performance and usage trends to improve our content and features.

Please note that if you return to this website from a different browser or device, you may need to reselect your cookie preferences.

For more information about our privacy practices, including your rights and choices, please see our Privacy Policy. 

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Strictly Necessary Cookies are essential for the website to function, and cannot be turned off. We use this type of cookie for purposes such as security, network management, and accessibility. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but if you do so, some parts of the site will not work. 

Functionality Cookies

Always Active

Functionality Cookies are used to enhance the functionality and personalization of this website. These cookies support features like embedded content (such as video or audio), keyword search highlighting, and remembering your preferences across pages—for example, your cookie choices or form inputs during submission.

Some of these cookies are managed by third-party service providers whose features are embedded on our site. These cookies do not store personal information and are necessary for certain site features to work properly.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek