Inquiring minds want to know!
It's been a slow week for real news, and we have a long weekend coming up. But I found two stories relating to employees (one was a law partner, so technically not an employee) who blew their stacks and lost their jobs.
If you were the boss, would you have fired these guys, or would you have let them off with a stern warning? I'll give you my opinion at the end. And many thanks to the Daily Mail, whence these stories came and which always has the best "tabloid" news from the United States.
No. 1: Karma's a female dog. An associate in a Cleveland law firm took maternity leave. While she was on leave, she started looking for another job and apparently accepted one because she resigned two days after returning to work. One of the partners in the firm didn't take kindly to this, and he allegedly sent her this text message:
I had suspicions you were interviewing two months ago and I told Stephen then to ask you about it. He was too nice of a guy to do so. What you did -- collecting salary from the firm while sitting on your a**, except to find time to interview for another job -- says everything one needs to know about your character. Karma's a b****. Rest assured regarding anyone who inquires, they will hear the truth from me about what a soul-less and morally bankrupt person you are.
(Asterisks not in original.)
Not exactly "we wish you all the best in your future endeavors," is it? Needless to say, the text made it to social media and to Cleveland.com before hitting the Daily Mail.
Needless to say, his partners voted to fire him.
After the fact, the partner reportedly admitted having sent the text and acknowledged that it was "inappropriate and disrespectful."
In the firm's defense, the text was clearly nasty and threatening -- and it was widely shared (and condemned) on social media. In addition, it was alleged that this associate had been asked to work while she was on maternity leave, which -- if true -- may have been what prompted her to start looking for another job. (It isn't clear whether the alleged work was assigned by the partner who sent the text.) On the other hand, the partner probably dashed off that text in the heat of the moment, not to mention while in a panic about how the work was going to get done without the associate.
If you were a partner in this firm, what would you have done?
¤ Vote to fire the partner.
¤ Vote to give the partner a stern reprimand and make him apologize to the associate. And take away his cell phone so he can't text in the heat of passion any more.
¤ Call the associate's new law firm and tell them she misappropriated client funds and is a defendant in a legal malpractice lawsuit.
No. 2: Cop gone wild. A police officer in Waterbury, Connecticut, was directing traffic. As he waved for the westbound vehicles to proceed through the intersection, a woman heading east in an SUV barreled through. The cop yelled for her to "Stop the f***ing car," then slapped her car, and then chased her down the road, yelling for her to pull over. She pulled over, and he came over and started chewing her out. She began to apologize and said she hadn't understood what was going on at the intersection. Her apologies had no effect. He kept on and on, saying she was trying to kill him and that she was going to ruin his kids' Christmas because they wouldn't have a daddy any more.
As a result of this encounter, the cop is now an ex-cop.
Before you judge, do watch the video.
Have you seen the video?
OK. Now, if you were the chief of police, what would you have done?
¤ Fire the cop.
¤ Reprimand the cop and require him to go to anger management.
¤ Confiscate the driver's SUV.
This cop was indeed acting like a jerk. But from what I could tell from the video, it looked like the woman drove awfully fast through the intersection even though there was a flashing yellow light and a police officer in the intersection waving his arms. It also looked like she didn't stop or pull over immediately when the cop told her to do it. To her credit, she apologized, and the cop probably would still be a cop if he'd accepted the apology, given her a citation, and sent her on her way. But, of course, he couldn't let it go. (Adrenaline?)
My opinion? I guess I am a softy. In both of these cases, I probably would have leaned toward a reprimand and appropriate behavior management -- assuming there had been no prior history of similar behavior. That said, I don't see any legal problems with choosing termination. (The cop is represented by a union, which is reviewing his case. Whether he gets his job back will depend on the terms of his collective bargaining agreement.)
Please feel free to opine in the comments, and have a great weekend!
- Partner
Robin has more than 30 years' experience counseling employers and representing them before government agencies and in employment litigation involving Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with ...
Robin Shea has 30 years' experience in employment litigation, including Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act (including the Amendments Act).
Continue Reading
Subscribe
Contributors
- William A. "Zan" Blue, Jr.
- Obasi Bryant
- Kenneth P. Carlson, Jr.
- James M. Coleman
- Cara Yates Crotty
- Lara C. de Leon
- Christopher R. Deubert
- Joyce M. Dos Santos
- Colin Finnegan
- Steven B. Katz
- Ellen C. Kearns
- F. Damon Kitchen
- David C. Kurtz
- Angelique Groza Lyons
- John E. MacDonald
- Alyssa K. Peters
- Sarah M. Phaff
- David P. Phippen
- William K. Principe
- Sabrina M. Punia-Ly
- Angela L. Rapko
- Rachael Rustmann
- Paul Ryan
- Robin E. Shea
- Kristine Marie Sims
- David L. Smith
- Jill S. Stricklin
- Jack R. Wallace
Archives
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010