Posts tagged EEOC.

A change may be coming. Continue Reading ›

Uh, no, says judge. Continue Reading ›

But it depends on what your definition of "complete" is. Continue Reading ›

Who's the "swing vote," the "parade of horribles," and more. Continue Reading ›

Didn't get your data in yesterday? You get a break. Continue Reading ›

HR people, you know what I'm talking about. Continue Reading ›

What a colossal waste this has been. Continue Reading ›

According to the DOJ. Continue Reading ›

UPDATED (8/17/19)! Continue Reading ›

No legal authority to issue its Enforcement Guidance! Continue Reading ›

The EEOC has a new General Counsel. Continue Reading ›

The position has been vacant since late 2016. Continue Reading ›

Let's get this party started. Continue Reading ›

Here's the timetable for EEO-1 comp data reporting. Continue Reading ›

This is getting to be a trend. Continue Reading ›

The 9/30 deadline is still on. Continue Reading ›

What the Supreme Court's decision in Fort Bend really means. Continue Reading ›

It's spring, and a young person's fancy turns to . . . Continue Reading ›

EEOC gets its quorum back, but OSHA loses. Continue Reading ›

We know the EEOC has appealed. What does that mean for employers? Continue Reading ›

Court says no, in one of the weirdest cases ever. Continue Reading ›

The last chapter, subject to the government's right to appeal. Continue Reading ›

The never-ending story. Continue Reading ›

Most charges were down, but sex harassment, LGBT charges were up. Continue Reading ›

Start gathering that comp data, if you haven't already. Continue Reading ›

Better start gathering that 2018 pay data, just in case. Continue Reading ›

Hot darn! Two Friday quizzes in a row! Continue Reading ›

I love my readers! Continue Reading ›

But when? And how? Continue Reading ›

But it ain't over yet. Continue Reading ›

I see some bombs tucked away in there. Continue Reading ›

Thanks, shutdown! Continue Reading ›

No more excuses! Continue Reading ›

Can you occasionally skip the EEOC and go straight to court if there's a really good reason? Continue Reading ›

Two for the EEOC, three for the DOL, and none for the NLRB.  Continue Reading ›

This case will blow your mind. Continue Reading ›

Here's a summary of what you may have missed over the holiday break. Continue Reading ›

After a year and a half in limbo, Daniel Gade has apparently had enough. Continue Reading ›

A not unexpected development. Continue Reading ›

What are you thankful for this year? Here is my list. Continue Reading ›

This case makes my head hurt. Continue Reading ›

We may know by the end of this month. Continue Reading ›

Nah. They'll just agree to disagree. Continue Reading ›

A preview of coming attractions! Continue Reading ›

How quickly things change! Continue Reading ›

A new lawsuit filed by the EEOC is a good guide for employers on what not to do. Continue Reading ›

Could be -- at the state level. Continue Reading ›

C'mon, Supreme Court: Settle this one! Continue Reading ›

An argument can be made. Continue Reading ›

But will the EEOC be allowed to defend? Continue Reading ›

"Zero tolerance" is too blunt an instrument, and it may even increase bad behavior. Continue Reading ›

Another federal appeals court will soon decide whether Title VII prohibits sexual orientation discrimination. Continue Reading ›

It's probably coming, but it's not here yet.  Continue Reading ›

It's all pretty good news for employers. Continue Reading ›

It's enough to make an "onionhead" weep. Continue Reading ›

Coming soon to a nation near you.  Continue Reading ›

It's the attorney who won the ground-breaking "pregnancy accommodation" case. Continue Reading ›

The Sixth Circuit decision seems overall correct, although it contains some "woke dicta," too. Continue Reading ›

Are you in the know? Continue Reading ›

Let's look at the arguments, pro and con, that the Supreme Court is likely to hear someday. Continue Reading ›

Not a lot to the EEOC's 2018-22 Strategic Enforcement Plan, but that might be good for employers. Continue Reading ›

An injunction of the EEOC's 2012 Guidance on use of criminal background information applies only to the State of Texas . . . but all employers might be able to make use of it. Continue Reading ›

After all, Fiscal Year 2017 ended just about the time that #MeToo began. Continue Reading ›

A residential care provider has settled an EEOC lawsuit alleging failure to accommodate an employee's pregnancy. Continue Reading ›

Employers have until March 31. No comp data required.  Continue Reading ›

I hope everyone's holidays were happy. While I was out . . . Continue Reading ›

You snooze, you lose, the court said. (In so many words.) Continue Reading ›

Welcome back to an old friend, and goodbye to one we wish we'd had longer. Continue Reading ›

What are you grateful for this year? Here is my list. Continue Reading ›

The feds are talking about NLRB-EEOC coordination, an end to collection of compensation data, and an inflation-indexed salary test for the overtime exemption. Here's the scoop. Continue Reading ›

Last month, I had the pleasure of speaking to the Federal Bar Association about hot topics under the Americans with Disabilities Act with my blogging buddy Bill Goren, proprietor of the Understanding the ADA blog. If you haven’t visited Bill’s blog, you should — he covers all aspects of the ADA, including Titles II and III, as well as the employment provisions (Title I).

Here are four ADA (or ADA-related) areas that employers need to watch in the coming year: Continue Reading ›

This week, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that a “multimonth leave of absence is beyond the scope of a reasonable accommodation” under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

In doing so, the court rejected longstanding guidance from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission that a long-term medical leave is a reasonable accommodation when the leave is (1) definite and time-limited (not open ended); (2) requested in advance; and (3) likely to enable the employee to perform the essential job functions on return. Noting that under the EEOC’s position “the length of leave does not matter,” the court characterized it as an “open-ended extension” of leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act. Continue Reading ›

With President Trump in office for nine months now, it is hard to believe that none of his people are yet on the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The four current Commissioners, including the Acting Chair, Republican Victoria Lipnic, and former Chair Jenny Yang, were all appointed by President Obama.

But that may change soon. The Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee held hearings this week on the nominations of Janet Dhillon for EEOC Chair and Daniel Gade for EEOC Commissioner.

(The Senate confirmation vote for William Emanuel, whose nomination as a Member of the National Labor Relations Board has been pending for quite some time, is expected to take place imminently.)

Here’s what we have learned about Ms. Dhillon and Dr. Gade from this week’s HELP Committee testimony, according to an article in Bloomberg BNA’s Daily Labor ReportContinue Reading ›

Laboratory Corporation of America has agreed to pay approximately $200,000 to resolve a matter with Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs. According to the Conciliation Agreement between the parties, the OFCCP

 found statistically significant adverse impact against females in the selection process for Lab Assistant and that Asians were paid less than similarly situated non-Asian White employees in the Lab Assistant position.

The alleged hiring discrimination resulted in a shortfall of only two females, and the amount of statistical significance was redacted from the Conciliation Agreement posted online by the OFCCP.  To resolve this claim, LabCorp will distribute more than $51,000 to the affected class of female applicants. In addition, the company agreed to revise its selection process, “including the criteria used in each step of the hiring process, any application screens, interviews, tests, credit checks, review of criminal history, reference checks, testing, or other selection procedure;” to review and revise the job description for Lab Assistant “to minimize the potential for gender stereotyping”; and to list the minimum requirements for the Lab Assistant position on all job postings.

To resolve the allegations of compensation discrimination, LabCorp will pay almost $150,000 to Asian Lab Assistants who were allegedly paid less than their White counterparts, even after controlling for legitimate, non-discriminatory factors. In addition, the company must conduct its own regression analysis in six months, and if it reveals statistically significant adverse impact against Asians, LabCorp has agreed to increase their salaries.

Of course, LabCorp’s settlement with the agency is not an admission of liability or wrongdoing. Continue Reading ›

Based on a recent Senate appropriations bill, it appears that the Trump Administration’s plan to merge the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission with the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs has stalled. The

 Senate bill would fund the OFCCP for Fiscal Year 2018 at approximately $103.5 million, which is more than the House’s proposed funding of $94.5 million. Congress would not be proposing funds for the agency if it planned to eliminate it.

This legislative action follows a letter from Acting OFCCP Director Thomas Dowd to the Institute for Workplace Equality on August 24, “acknowledg[ing] that the consolidation proposal includes several challenging transition issues.” Although Mr. Dowd did not expressly state that merger plans were on ice, he noted that any consolidation was unlikely to occur until Fiscal Year 2019 and that the agency would focus on “contemporaneous opportunities to improve effectiveness and efficiency.”

Perhaps Congress is listening to its constituents. The proposed merger was opposed by both civil rights advocacy groups and employer organizations, and my colleague Angelique Lyons cogently summarized the pros and cons here.

We will continue to monitor this issue for further developments. Continue Reading ›

This just in, from Randel Johnson, Vice President of Labor, Immigration, and Employee Benefits at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce:

Members of the Chamber’s Labor Relations and Employee Benefits Committees:

We have just learned that the deadline for compliance with the new EEO-1 form reporting requirement for data on hours and compensation will be stayed indefinitely. According to our sources, [the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs of the Office of Management and Budget] based their decision on two grounds, one of which was the appeal submitted by the Chamber that highlighted the new form’s problems with cost, utility, and confidentiality. [The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission] will be publishing further details about what actions they will be taking and any future deadlines and timelines in the Federal Register.

This is a victory, not just for the business community, but for common sense in the world of regulations and information collection. As you know, the Chamber was at the forefront throughout the development of the revised form in crafting arguments opposing EEOC’s gross overreach in expanding the existing EEO-1 form to unmanageable proportions without any discernable benefit. . . .

We will provide more details on this important development as they become available.

Hopefully you’ll find this good news as the summer comes to an end!

I was not a fan of this new EEO-1 reporting requirement, so I am happy as a clam. Continue Reading ›

This is Constangy’s flagship law blog, founded in 2010 by Robin Shea, who is chief legal editor and a regular contributor. This nationally recognized blog also features posts from other Constangy attorneys in the areas of immigration, labor relations, and sports law, keeping HR professionals and employers informed about the latest legal trends.

Search

Get Updates By Email

Subscribe

Archives

Legal Influencer Lexology Badge ABA Web 100 Badge
Jump to Page

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When using this website, Constangy and certain third parties may collect and use cookies or similar technologies to enhance your experience. These technologies may collect information about your device, activity on our website, and preferences. Some cookies are essential to site functionality, while others help us analyze performance and usage trends to improve our content and features.

Please note that if you return to this website from a different browser or device, you may need to reselect your cookie preferences.

For more information about our privacy practices, including your rights and choices, please see our Privacy Policy. 

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Strictly Necessary Cookies are essential for the website to function, and cannot be turned off. We use this type of cookie for purposes such as security, network management, and accessibility. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but if you do so, some parts of the site will not work. 

Functionality Cookies

Always Active

Functionality Cookies are used to enhance the functionality and personalization of this website. These cookies support features like embedded content (such as video or audio), keyword search highlighting, and remembering your preferences across pages—for example, your cookie choices or form inputs during submission.

Some of these cookies are managed by third-party service providers whose features are embedded on our site. These cookies do not store personal information and are necessary for certain site features to work properly.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek