Workplace emoji DON'Ts

You DO want to be "with it," don't you?

The Daily Mail came out this week with a list of workplace emoji that Generation Z says are either offensive or totally uncool. And apparently Boomers aren't the only offenders. According to the article, Gen Z thinks Gen X and Millennials need to get with it, too.

If you don't want to be a square, here are the emoji that Gen Z says you should never use:

True confessions: I use the “thumbs up” emoji a lot in texts with my kids, but they started it, and I do usually follow up with a verbal message. Unless, of course, we're texting while I'm driving. (Joke!)

I think I used the red heart emoji as recently as Monday, wishing my son and daughter-in-law a happy wedding anniversary. They’re Gen Y, so they were nice about it.

I used the grimacing emoji in a blog post in 2017 – I hope that can’t still be used against me. I don’t think I’ve used it since. And I have used the clapping hands a time or two.

But in my work-related emails, the only emoji I use is the basic smiley face. I can’t even use the “thumbs up” because our email doesn’t have the capability. (At least, I don't think it does. Some Z’er could probably show me how.) 

The Daily Mail article got a lot of comments, some pretty funny, from the "olds." This one made me laugh out loud:

Seriously, though, I think the kids have a point. Their complaints about the “poop” emoji and even the “thumbs up” emoji (when not immediately followed by words) is that they can come across as disrespectful or dismissive. In fact, the article hints that Gen Z would prefer for their colleagues to communicate using actual, like, words instead of pictures.

They prefer words. I think that is great, don’t you?

What does any of this have to do with employment law? As some employers have learned the hard way, there can be employee relations issues (which can turn into lawsuits) associated with communications that are too casual or that are subject to more than one meaning. Words aren’t perfect, but they are usually better than emoji at expressing what a person really intends to express.

For example, how would you feel if you asked your boss about a project, and got this response:

(No further response from you because it's hard to text while you are marching down the hall to report your boss to HR.)

Now, how would you feel about this one?

So, maybe Gen Z is being intolerant, but I’m generally in their corner on the workplace emoji issue. Anything that fosters good employee relations and deters misunderstandings that can turn into charges and lawsuits is OK in my book.

But I still don’t get what Gen Z has against the red heart emoji. 

P.S. Note to employers: You probably figured it out already, but those text message examples I used were fabricated by me using a free app that is easily available on the internet. So please be a little skeptical about text message evidence, especially if one of the parties adamantly denies that the texts are theirs. There are ways to confirm whether a text is genuine or a fake. Our office has had at least two cases in which we confirmed that an employee tried to "frame" a co-worker for misconduct using fake texts. It's a real thing.

  • Smiling older woman with short gray hair and glasses, wearing a dark gray cardigan over a black top and a beaded necklace, with arms confidently crossed. She has a warm, approachable demeanor and a professional presence against a transparent background.
    Of Counsel & Chief Legal Editor

    Robin also conducts internal investigations and delivers training for HR professionals, managers, and employees on topics such as harassment prevention, disability accommodation, and leave management.

    Robin is editor in chief ...

This is Constangy’s flagship law blog, founded in 2010 by Robin Shea, who is chief legal editor and a regular contributor. This nationally recognized blog also features posts from other Constangy attorneys in the areas of immigration, labor relations, and sports law, keeping HR professionals and employers informed about the latest legal trends.

Search

Get Updates By Email

Subscribe

Archives

Legal Influencer Lexology Badge ABA Web 100 Badge
Jump to Page

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When using this website, Constangy and certain third parties may collect and use cookies or similar technologies to enhance your experience. These technologies may collect information about your device, activity on our website, and preferences. Some cookies are essential to site functionality, while others help us analyze performance and usage trends to improve our content and features.

Please note that if you return to this website from a different browser or device, you may need to reselect your cookie preferences.

For more information about our privacy practices, including your rights and choices, please see our Privacy Policy. 

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Strictly Necessary Cookies are essential for the website to function, and cannot be turned off. We use this type of cookie for purposes such as security, network management, and accessibility. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but if you do so, some parts of the site will not work. 

Functionality Cookies

Always Active

Functionality Cookies are used to enhance the functionality and personalization of this website. These cookies support features like embedded content (such as video or audio), keyword search highlighting, and remembering your preferences across pages—for example, your cookie choices or form inputs during submission.

Some of these cookies are managed by third-party service providers whose features are embedded on our site. These cookies do not store personal information and are necessary for certain site features to work properly.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek