Federal vaccine mandates: Where employers stand now

This week in Vaccine Mandate/Injunction Land.

UPDATE (12/18/21): The stay on the OSHA Emergency Temporary Standard has been lifted. Details here.

Well, kids, it's been another riotous week in the world of federal vaccine mandates. Here is where everything stands as of Friday morning Eastern Time, December 17, 2021:

OSHA ETS. The Emergency Temporary Standard issued by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration applies to most private sector employers with 100 or more employees. The ETS has been stayed nationwide (put on hold) since November 6, the day after it was issued. So many unhappy employers across the nation sued over the ETS that the cases were consolidated and sent to a federal appeals court chosen by lottery, which will issue one ruling in all the cases. The winning court, as we all know, is the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

The anti-mandate parties wanted the full Sixth Circuit (16 judges, with a majority of Republican appointees) to hear the cases. The Government wanted the cases to initially be decided by a three-judge panel, presumably because that would give the Government a fighting chance of getting a majority of two Democratic appointees.

The full Sixth Circuit decided on Wednesday that the cases would initially be decided by a three-judge panel, not by all 16 judges. We don't know who the three judges on the panel are, but we can speculate. The judges voted 8-8 not to hear the case en banc (that is, by the full court). Thirteen of the 16 judges wrote or joined in opinions. The word on the street is that the three judges who did not write or join in opinions are the members of the panel. That would stand to reason.

If the speculation is correct, the panel consists of Judge Julie Smith Gibbons and Judge Richard Allen Griffin (both appointed by George W. Bush) and Judge Jane Branstetter Stranch (appointed by Barack Obama).

Federal contractor mandate. As Cara Crotty has written, a federal judge in Georgia on December 7 preliminarily enjoined the federal contractor vaccine mandate nationwide. Kicking the mandate while it's down, a federal judge in Louisiana yesterday granted yet another preliminary injunction to three states that challenged the mandate -- Indiana, Louisiana, and Mississippi.

CMS mandate (health care employers). OK, this one is complicated, but fortunately Dave Kurtz and Sabrina Punia-Ly have explained it all for us. The vaccine mandate issued by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, which applies to certain employers who receive Medicare or Medicaid funds, was preliminarily enjoined on November 29 by a federal court in Missouri. The injunction applied only to the states that had filed the lawsuit challenging the mandate. Those states were Alaska, Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming. The next day, a federal court in Louisiana issued a preliminary injunction against the mandate in the remainder of the 50 states.

This week, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled that the Louisiana injunction should not apply nationwide but only to the states that were plaintiffs in that lawsuit. Those states are Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Utah, and West Virginia.

Meanwhile, in the Lone Star State, a federal judge on Wednesday granted a preliminary injunction against the mandate that applies only in the State of Texas.

So, if you're keeping score, as of yesterday, the CMS mandate is enjoined in 25 of the 50 states and not enjoined in the other 25 of the 50 states. So far, the CMS has not announced what it plans to do, if anything, in the way of enforcement.


However, the Government did apply yesterday to the U.S. Supreme Court to have the Louisiana and Missouri injunctions stayed while it appeals those decisions. Here's the Louisiana application, and here is the Missouri application. (Texas and Louisiana are both in the Fifth Circuit, so a Fifth Circuit decision in the Louisiana case would indirectly apply to the Texas case, as well.) 

Oh! Oh! I almost forgot! In an unusual win for the Government, a federal judge in Florida denied the motion of the State of Florida to enjoin the CMS mandate. Florida appealed and asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit to issue a preliminary injunction against the mandate while the appeal was pending. The 11th Circuit said no. 

I hope I haven't missed anything. I probably have.

  • Smiling older woman with short gray hair and glasses, wearing a dark gray cardigan over a black top and a beaded necklace, with arms confidently crossed. She has a warm, approachable demeanor and a professional presence against a transparent background.
    Of Counsel & Chief Legal Editor

    Robin also conducts internal investigations and delivers training for HR professionals, managers, and employees on topics such as harassment prevention, disability accommodation, and leave management.

    Robin is editor in chief ...

This is Constangy’s flagship law blog, founded in 2010 by Robin Shea, who is chief legal editor and a regular contributor. This nationally recognized blog also features posts from other Constangy attorneys in the areas of immigration, labor relations, and sports law, keeping HR professionals and employers informed about the latest legal trends.

Search

Get Updates By Email

Subscribe

Archives

Legal Influencer Lexology Badge ABA Web 100 Badge
Jump to Page

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When using this website, Constangy and certain third parties may collect and use cookies or similar technologies to enhance your experience. These technologies may collect information about your device, activity on our website, and preferences. Some cookies are essential to site functionality, while others help us analyze performance and usage trends to improve our content and features.

Please note that if you return to this website from a different browser or device, you may need to reselect your cookie preferences.

For more information about our privacy practices, including your rights and choices, please see our Privacy Policy. 

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Strictly Necessary Cookies are essential for the website to function, and cannot be turned off. We use this type of cookie for purposes such as security, network management, and accessibility. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but if you do so, some parts of the site will not work. 

Functionality Cookies

Always Active

Functionality Cookies are used to enhance the functionality and personalization of this website. These cookies support features like embedded content (such as video or audio), keyword search highlighting, and remembering your preferences across pages—for example, your cookie choices or form inputs during submission.

Some of these cookies are managed by third-party service providers whose features are embedded on our site. These cookies do not store personal information and are necessary for certain site features to work properly.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek