OFCCP proposes to broaden protection of religious exercise.
Citing the need to clarify the scope and application of the religious exemption for federal contractors, the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs issued a proposed regulatory update.
The OFCCP enforces Executive Order 11246, which prohibits federal contractors from discriminating against applicants or employees on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, and national origin. Executive Order 11246 is, for the most part, interpreted in accordance with Title VII principles and case law. (Whether Title VII prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity remains unsettled. The U.S. Supreme Court will be hearing oral argument on these issues on October 8.)
Building on recent Supreme Court precedent, the proposed regulation focuses on religious organizations and proposes to add five definitions to its regulations implementing Executive Order 11246.
. . . this proposal is intended to make clear that the Executive Order 11246 religious exemption covers not just churches but employers that are organized for a religious purpose, hold themselves out to the public as carrying out a religious purpose, and engage in exercise of religion consistent with, and in furtherance of, a religious purpose. It is also intended to make clear that religious employers can condition employment on acceptance of or adherence to religious tenets without sanction by the federal government, provided that they do not discriminate based on other protected bases.
The agency states, however, that “the religious exemption itself does not exempt or excuse a contractor from complying with other applicable [non-discrimination] requirements” and that a contractor cannot “invoke religion to discriminate on other bases protected by law.”
Some commentators have expressed concern that this proposal may be intended to allow religious organizations to discriminate against LGBT individuals; however, it remains unclear how the agency would apply this provision to a religious organization that declines to hire someone because of his/her/their sexual orientation or gender identity. While such an action could potentially be based on adherence to religious tenets, it would also be discrimination based on another protected basis. Significantly, the proposed rules does not address this type of scenario.
Although not included in the proposed regulation itself, the OFCCP states that it intends to apply a “but-for” standard of causation where a contractor claiming the religious exemption asserts that the challenged employment action was based on religion. The OFCCP notes that it has previously rejected use of the “but-for” standard in similar contexts and requests comment on this proposal and whether it should be included in the regulatory text.
Interested parties may comment on the proposed regulation by September 16, 2019.
- Partner
Cara advises employers on ways to avoid litigation and has defended employers in cases involving virtually every aspect of the employment relationship, including discrimination, harassment, and retaliation claims and various ...
Our Affirmative Action Alert blog focuses on the latest news and topics affecting federal contractors and subcontractors and their compliance with affirmative action and other employment-related laws and regulations. With breaking news, quick updates, and headlines on the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs and affirmative action issues, this blog is a great resource for in-house counsel, HR managers, and other compliance professionals. Our blog is a companion to Constangy’s Affirmative Action newsletters, which address significant legislative, regulatory, and administrative proposals and changes. Subscribe to both to stay current on these important topics!
Subscribe
Archives
- June 2024
- May 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- January 2023
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- July 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- December 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017