A Mixed Bag of Guidance: The IRS Issues Final Regulations on the Employer Pay-or-Play Mandate Under ACA

Analysis

For a printer-friendly copy, click here.

The IRS released the long awaited final regulations to the employer shared responsibility provisions of the Affordable Care Act ("ACA") (aka the "pay-or-play mandate") along with a set of FAQs on the pay-or-play mandate. On a first read of the 227 pages of guidance, the regulations appear to be a mixed bag for employers and industries with particular needs such as higher education. What is clear is that additional guidance will be needed and the final regulations appear to embrace that notion. With that said, here are some of the highlights of this round of ACA rulemaking:

Application of the Pay-or-Play Mandate

  • For employers with non-calendar year plans, the mandate will generally apply beginning with the first day of the 2015 plan year as opposed to January 1, 2015, for calendar year plans.
  • The requirement to cover dependents will not apply for the 2014 pla year or the 2015 plan year so long the employer meets the following criteria:
    • The employer did not offer dependent coverage during the 2013 or 2014 plan year.
    • The employer is taking steps to arrange for dependent coverage to begin in the 2016 plan year.
  • For purposes of determining whether an employer is subject to the pay-or-play mandate in 2015, an employer can determine whether it had at least 100 full-time or full-time equivalent employees by reference to a period of at least six consecutive months in 2014.
  • An employer that employs more than 50 but less than 100 full-time and full-time equivalent employees during 2014 is given until the 2016 plan year to comply with the pay-or-play mandate so long as the employer meets the following conditions:
    • The employer does not reduce the size of its workforce or the overall hours of its workforce to meet the workforce size condition.
    • The employer does not eliminate or materially reduce the health coverage, if any, it offered as of February 9, 2014.
    • The employer certifies to the IRS that it meets the above criteria.
  • For the 2015 plan year, an employer's offer of health coverage has to be made to at least 70% of the employer's full-time employees (and their dependents – unless the special exemption for dependent coverage applies – see above) to avoid the no coverage penalty. The employer remains subject to the affordability penalty.
  • For the 2016 plan year, an employer's offer of health coverage has to be made to at least 95% of the employer's full-time employees (and their dependents) to avoid the no coverage penalty. The employer remains subject to the affordability penalty.

Institutions of Higher Education

  • The final regulations give institutions of higher education relief with respect to students who are employed by the institution through the federal work study program, but offer no relief with respect to students otherwise employed by the institution. This generally means that institutions of higher education will not have to treat work-study students as "employees" but will, for example, have to measure the hours of service completed by grad students (e.g., teaching assistants, lab assistants, etc.).
  • The final regulations provide a safe harbor for counting adjunct faculty hours of service pursuant to which an adjunct faculty member is credited with 2.25 hours of service for each hour taught, and is credited with an additional hour of service for each hour worked outside of the classroom (e.g., mandatory faculty meetings). This safe harbor is available until at least the end of 2015. It is anticipated that further guidance will be issued at some point in the future.
  • The final regulations provide that an institution of higher education that does not otherwise use the safe harbor approach must use a "reasonable method" for crediting hours of service of adjunct faculty members.

Determining Employment Status

  • The final regulations adopt the common law approach to determining whether an employee-employer relationship exists. The regulations specifically define an employee to exclude a leased employee (as defined in section 414(n)(2)), a sole proprietor, a partner in a partnership, a 2-percent S corporation shareholder, or a worker described in IRC section 3508 (e.g., real estate agents and direct sellers).
  • The final regulations do not provide a safe harbor definition for independent contractors nor do the regulations provide relief for industries that employ so-called "high turnover" employees.

Definition of Seasonal Employee Provided

  • The regulations define a "seasonal employee" as an employee who is hired into a position for which the customary annual employment is six months or less. The preamble to the regulations further clarify that "the reference to customary means that by the nature of the position an employee in this position typically works for a period of six months or less, and that period should begin each calendar year in approximately the same part of the year, such as summer or winter."

Volunteer Firefighters and Emergency Medical and Other "Bona Fide Volunteers"

  • The final regulations provide that hours of service performed by "bona fide volunteers" need not be counted to determine whether the volunteer is a full-time employee.
  • The final regulations define a "bona fide volunteer" as any volunteer who is an employee of a government entity or a 501(c) tax-exempt organization whose only compensation from that entity or organization is in the form of (i) reimbursement for (or reasonable allowance for) reasonable expenses incurred in the performance of services by volunteers, or (ii) reasonable benefits (including length of service awards), and nominal fees, customarily paid by similar entities in connection with the performance of services by volunteers. Examples of bona fide volunteers include volunteer firefighters and emergency medical.

Employers need to evaluate the impact the final regulations will have as they continue to implement ACA. As always, employers are encouraged to also look beyond the final regulations in developing their implementation strategy. By way of example, an employer can be 100% ACA-compliant in its implementation strategy, yet violate federal law and, in some cases state law, beyond ACA. Care must be taken to understand the interplay between ACA and other laws when implementing strategies built around the pay-or-play mandate.

The above summary is not meant to be an exhaustive list of the rules contained in the final regulations but, rather, is meant to highlight some of the standout provisions of the new guidance. We will continue to analyze the final regulations and prepare special reports on the impact the regulations will have on employers' ACA implementation efforts.

The Final Regulations can be found here.

The FAQS can be found here.

Constangy is committed to keeping its clients aware of new and evolving rules and trends in the law. For more information on the guidance addressed in this ERISA Strategist or health care reform generally, please contact any member of Constangy's Employee Benefits practice group, or the Constangy attorney of your choice.

About Constangy, Brooks & Smith, LLP

Constangy, Brooks & Smith, LLP has counseled employers on labor and employment law matters, exclusively, since 1946. A "Go To" Law Firm in Corporate Counsel and Fortune Magazine, it represents Fortune 500 corporations and small companies across the country. Its attorneys are consistently rated as top lawyers in their practice areas by sources such as Chambers USA, Martindale-Hubbell, and Top One Hundred Labor Attorneys in the United States, and the firm is top-ranked by the U.S. News & World Report/Best Lawyers Best Law Firms survey. More than 140 lawyers partner with clients to provide cost-effective legal services and sound preventive advice to enhance the employer-employee relationship. Offices are located in Alabama, California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Massachusetts, Missouri, New Jersey, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia and Wisconsin. For more information, visit www.constangy.com.

Subscribe for Updates
Jump to Page

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When using this website, Constangy and certain third parties may collect and use cookies or similar technologies to enhance your experience. These technologies may collect information about your device, activity on our website, and preferences. Some cookies are essential to site functionality, while others help us analyze performance and usage trends to improve our content and features.

Please note that if you return to this website from a different browser or device, you may need to reselect your cookie preferences.

For more information about our privacy practices, including your rights and choices, please see our Privacy Policy. 

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Strictly Necessary Cookies are essential for the website to function, and cannot be turned off. We use this type of cookie for purposes such as security, network management, and accessibility. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but if you do so, some parts of the site will not work. 

Functionality Cookies

Always Active

Functionality Cookies are used to enhance the functionality and personalization of this website. These cookies support features like embedded content (such as video or audio), keyword search highlighting, and remembering your preferences across pages—for example, your cookie choices or form inputs during submission.

Some of these cookies are managed by third-party service providers whose features are embedded on our site. These cookies do not store personal information and are necessary for certain site features to work properly.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek