Illinois adds disparate impact liability to state civil rights law

Illinois doubles down on disparate impact. 

On July 31, Gov. J.B. Pritzker (D) signed the Civil Rights Safeguard Act, which amends the Illinois Human Rights Act to expressly recognize disparate impact liability in the context of employment decisions, among others. The new law will take effect on January 1.

The Act does not create a new legal theory. Disparate impact discrimination has long been recognized, and the concept is simple: in certain circumstances, an employer does not have to intend to discriminate to be liable. Neutral employment practices that disproportionately affect members of a protected group can still result in liability.

The Act makes it a civil rights violation for an employer, employment agency, or labor organization to use employment criteria or methods, including practices or policies, that disproportionately affect individuals of a protected class.

“Protected classes” include actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, ancestry, age, sex, marital status, order of protection status, disability, military status, sexual orientation, pregnancy, reproductive decisions, and unfavorable discharge from military service. They also include citizenship and work authorization status, family responsibilities, arrest record, and conviction record.

The Act applies to employment decisions, as well as public accommodations and applications for credit.

An employer may defend a challenged practice by showing that it is job-related and consistent with business necessity. However, a complainant may still prevail by showing that the employer’s needs could have been served by another practice that had less of a discriminatory effect.

This change to Illinois law was prompted by the federal government’s shift away from enforcing disparate impact liability and a desire to ensure protections exist at the state level.  

The Illinois Human Rights Act already recognizes disparate impact in housing, and since January 1 of this year, Illinois employers have been prohibited from using artificial intelligence in employment decisions when the use of AI has a disparate impact based on a protected class.

The new Civil Rights Safeguard Act adds an express disparate impact standard that applies to employment criteria and methods.

What should Illinois employers do now?

Employers should not need to overhaul every workplace policy. Instead, they should look at the practices that affect who is hired, promoted, disciplined, and retained. Hiring criteria, screening and assessment tools, promotion requirements, attendance rules, background checks, and physical requirements are good places to start.

For practices in these areas, employers should be able to answer three questions:

No. 1: Why did we adopt this policy or practice?

No. 2: What does this policy or practice actually achieve?

No. 3: Is our policy or practice job-related and consistent with business necessity, and if so, can we prove it?

If the answer to the first question is “we’ve always done it that way,” that is a good reason to examine it closely. Employers should understand the business purpose behind the requirement, whether it is actually connected to the job or employment decision, and if there is adverse impact, whether the same objective could reasonably be accomplished another way.

Employers should also pay attention to their data. A neutral policy can produce very different results in practice. The same is true for third-party screening and assessment tools. Using a vendor to help make an employment decision does not eliminate the need to understand how the process works or what results it produces. For employers already evaluating their practices for adverse impact, much of this will be familiar.

Illinois has made its position clear, and employers have several months before the new law takes effect. That is enough time to ask the important questions now, rather than later in response to a complaint.

For guidance or assistance in this area, please contact a member of Constangy’s EEO/Contractor Compliance, Reporting & Analytics Practice Group or an attorney in our Chicago, IL office.

  • Professional portrait of Leo Tyree smiling, with short dark hair, wearing a black blazer over a black turtleneck and small gold stud earrings. She faces forward and looks directly at the camera with a warm, confident expression.
    Senior Counsel

    She partners with employers to develop practical, business-focused strategies that manage legal risk, strengthen workforce stability, and support long-term business objectives. Leo advises employers on a broad range of ...

From developments in pay equity and changing requirements in data reporting, to DEI risk mitigation, Title VII compliance, and shifts in enforcement of Section 503 & VEVRAA, the EEO Compliance Dispatch blog is designed to keep employers informed and ahead of the curve.

Whether you’re a federal contractor navigating audits, an HR professional tackling pay transparency, or in-house counsel tracking state and local reporting requirements, our updates, legal analysis, and compliance strategies are tailored to help you manage risk and support a more inclusive workplace.

Search

Get Updates By Email

Subscribe

Archives

Jump to Page

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When using this website, Constangy and certain third parties may collect and use cookies or similar technologies to enhance your experience. These technologies may collect information about your device, activity on our website, and preferences. Some cookies are essential to site functionality, while others help us analyze performance and usage trends to improve our content and features.

Please note that if you return to this website from a different browser or device, you may need to reselect your cookie preferences.

For more information about our privacy practices, including your rights and choices, please see our Privacy Policy. 

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Strictly Necessary Cookies are essential for the website to function, and cannot be turned off. We use this type of cookie for purposes such as security, network management, and accessibility. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but if you do so, some parts of the site will not work. 

Functionality Cookies

Always Active

Functionality Cookies are used to enhance the functionality and personalization of this website. These cookies support features like embedded content (such as video or audio), keyword search highlighting, and remembering your preferences across pages—for example, your cookie choices or form inputs during submission.

Some of these cookies are managed by third-party service providers whose features are embedded on our site. These cookies do not store personal information and are necessary for certain site features to work properly.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek