NFL deflates Flores’ claim that Commissioner Goodell would be biased arbitrator

Back to the 1-yard line.

EDITOR’S NOTE: A version of this post was previously published on Forbes.com.

The race discrimination case filed by National Football League coach Brian Flores against the league and some of its clubs has made no meaningful progress since it was filed in February 2022. The delay is a result of Mr. Flores’ decision to pursue the action in federal court rather than in arbitration and to challenge the authority of NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell to be the arbitrator.

Mr. Flores has repeatedly lost the argument regarding Commissioner Goodell’s authority, and that issue is before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. However, Mr. Flores’ arguments may now be moot, because Commissioner Goodell has appointed Peter C. Harvey, former Attorney General of New Jersey, to be the arbitrator in the Flores case.

In other words, Commissioner Goodell will not be the arbitrator in Mr. Flores’s case in any event.

Court penalizes Flores for false start

In March 2023, a federal judge in the Southern District of New York issued a decision largely granting the NFL’s motion to compel arbitration. The court rejected Mr. Flores’s claims that the arbitration provisions in his contract were unenforceable because they gave the Commissioner Goodell authority to hear the dispute. Instead, the judge reasoned, if Commissioner Goodell administered the arbitration in a biased manner, then Mr. Flores could go to court and request that the arbitration decision be vacated. But the court would not prejudge the fairness of the proceedings, which were agreed to by Mr. Flores in his contract. (The New York Knicks recently lost a challenge to the authority of National Basketball League Commissioner Adam Silver based on the same reasoning.)

NFL has the ball

Returning to the Flores case, the NFL is appealing portions of the court’s order that denied its motion to compel arbitration. Mr. Flores, on the other hand, had no right to an appeal at this stage of the proceedings.

However, Mr. Flores is not without support. In July, 12 professors with expertise in arbitration law – led by Imre Szalai at Loyola University New Orleans College of Law – stepped in. In their brief, the professors have urged the Second Circuit to consider more broadly the potential implications of allowing employment-related arbitrations to be presided over by the Commissioner. The professors argue that permitting Commissioner Goodell to be the arbitrator “is unconscionable and contrary to the norms of fundamental fairness” and would provide an incentive for all employers to adopt similar dispute resolution processes.

Commissioner Goodell with the handoff

As explained in a prior article, the concerns raised by Mr. Flores and the professors are probably not realistic. To bypass such allegations, Commissioner Goodell has regularly appointed a neutral or near-neutral arbitrator to hear high-profile disputes.

He has now done so again. In a September 24 letter to the Second Circuit, the NFL informed the court that Commissioner Goodell had designated Mr.  Harvey as the arbitrator in the Flores case. Commissioner Goodell had previously tagged Mr. Harvey to hear the NFL’s appeal of an initial disciplinary decision involving Cleveland Browns quarterback DeShaun Watson. That case ultimately settled before Mr. Harvey had to weigh in.

Mr. Flores’ attorneys complained to the court that Commissioner Goodell’s designation of Mr. Harvey was merely “an attempt to falsely create an appearance of impartiality in the arbitration proceedings.” But Mr. Harvey’s resume is impeccable, and thus Mr. Flores’s arguments are unlikely to gain traction. That is particularly true in light of courts’ longstanding deference to the authority of sports league commissioners to resolve disputes. Indeed, in 2016, the Second Circuit famously upheld Commissioner Goodell’s authority in disciplining Tom Brady in the “Deflategate” matter.

The NFL’s appeal may well be decided in early 2025. Regardless of the outcome, the bulk (if not the entirety) of Mr. Flores’s case will have to proceed in arbitration. And by that point, Mr. Flores will have spent three years attempting an end-around that puts him back where he was in 2022.

  • Serious-looking man with short dark hair and beard wearing a light gray suit and dark tie, standing with arms crossed against a transparent background. His formal attire and posture suggest a professional or executive portrait.
    Senior Counsel

    He represents and advises businesses on a broad range of labor and employment matters, including discrimination complaints, wage and hour claims, class actions, employment agreements, restrictive covenants, data privacy ...

This is Constangy’s flagship law blog, founded in 2010 by Robin Shea, who is chief legal editor and a regular contributor. This nationally recognized blog also features posts from other Constangy attorneys in the areas of immigration, labor relations, and sports law, keeping HR professionals and employers informed about the latest legal trends.

Search

Get Updates By Email

Subscribe

Archives

Legal Influencer Lexology Badge ABA Web 100 Badge
Jump to Page

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When using this website, Constangy and certain third parties may collect and use cookies or similar technologies to enhance your experience. These technologies may collect information about your device, activity on our website, and preferences. Some cookies are essential to site functionality, while others help us analyze performance and usage trends to improve our content and features.

Please note that if you return to this website from a different browser or device, you may need to reselect your cookie preferences.

For more information about our privacy practices, including your rights and choices, please see our Privacy Policy. 

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Strictly Necessary Cookies are essential for the website to function, and cannot be turned off. We use this type of cookie for purposes such as security, network management, and accessibility. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but if you do so, some parts of the site will not work. 

Functionality Cookies

Always Active

Functionality Cookies are used to enhance the functionality and personalization of this website. These cookies support features like embedded content (such as video or audio), keyword search highlighting, and remembering your preferences across pages—for example, your cookie choices or form inputs during submission.

Some of these cookies are managed by third-party service providers whose features are embedded on our site. These cookies do not store personal information and are necessary for certain site features to work properly.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek