What's the difference?
There are three main ways for a defendant to bring a lawsuit to an end. Each involves a different level of proof – and of expense and hassle. It's better to get a lawsuit “disposed of” as early as possible.
Here is a quick summary.
Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim
What it is. The gist of a motion to dismiss is this: "Your honor, even if everything the plaintiff says in the lawsuit is true, he has not accused our client of doing anything for which the law provides a remedy."
Example. I sue you, and in my lawsuit, I accuse you of frowning at me. Maybe you didn't frown at me, or maybe you did. Even if you did, I can't sue you for that. So your lawyer would file a motion to dismiss my lawsuit on the ground that I had "failed to state a claim for which relief may be granted." (This type of motion is often referred to as a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, based on the rule of civil procedure that authorizes it.)
The upside. If you win (and you would, in the unrealistic example I provided), the case is over, subject to the plaintiff's right of appeal, and you got out of it cheap because you didn't have to go through discovery and motions and a big trial.
The downside. Because a motion to dismiss is filed so early, the court has to accept everything the plaintiff says as true and has to give the plaintiff the benefit of the doubt on pretty much everything. If the statute of limitations hasn't run out, and maybe even if it has, the judge might give the plaintiff "leave to amend," which lets the plaintiff rewrite the lawsuit so that it will state a legal claim. Sometimes the judge will dismiss some of the plaintiff's claims but leave others in the case, which means that the motion didn't end the lawsuit in its entirety.
If the defendant loses on its motion to dismiss, in whole or in part, the case goes back for litigation, including discovery, summary judgment, and possibly trial.
Summary Judgment
What it is. A motion for summary judgment is filed later, after both sides have filed their pleadings with the court, and after the parties have engaged in discovery (depositions, written questions and requests for documents, and the like).
Example. I sue you and say you fired me because I'm an over-40 female. Age and sex discrimination are clearly illegal, so my lawsuit has alleged some illegal conduct on your part, unlike my "frown" lawsuit. (A little more detail may be required for my lawsuit to survive, but that's a topic for another post.)
You can't say that my lawsuit fails to state a claim because it does, but you might be able to file a motion for summary judgment.
So you take my deposition, and in my deposition you get me to admit that my boss asked me to catch up on my filing and that I called him an obscene name and told him to drop dead. Then I went back to watching TikTok videos on my phone. I was fired that afternoon for insubordination and abusive language.
The upside. On a motion for summary judgment, you can present to the court my deposition testimony, your witnesses' testimony, and other evidence to show that "there is no genuine issue of material fact" that I was discharged for a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason. The court will still have to side with the "non-moving party" (in this example, me) on any disputed fact and does not make any judgments about who is more credible. But the court can accept undisputed facts that are in your favor, and also accept your evidence any time my side of the story was "I don't know," or “I don’t remember.”
Your chances of success on summary judgment are usually better than on a motion to dismiss because you can tell your side of the story. If you win, the case is over, subject to the plaintiff's right of appeal. The court will not give me a chance to rewrite my lawsuit at this late stage.
The downside. You have to go through the time, expense and hassle of the discovery process before you file. And, again, the court is required to side with the plaintiff about any disputed facts.
(Although it is not nearly as common, plaintiffs can also win summary judgment and avoid a trial if the undisputed facts are in their favor.)
If a motion for summary judgment is denied, the case is not over. It just goes to trial. A party can lose on summary judgment and still win at trial.
Trial
What it is. Come on. You know what a "trial" is.
Example. I sue for age and sex discrimination, and you take my co-worker's deposition. She says that she heard the CEO say, "I do not want any old biddies over 40 working in this company, and I vow with every fiber of my being to get rid of them all, no matter what it takes. And that includes Robin!" The CEO denies that he ever said this, and insists that I was fired for calling him a bad word and telling him to drop dead when he asked me to catch up on my filing.
Here we have major "disputed material facts," right? If my co-worker is telling the truth, the CEO has admitted to age and sex discrimination. If the CEO is telling the truth, then he had every legal right to fire me.
So, with this fact dispute, the court cannot grant your motion to dismiss, and it can't grant your motion for summary judgment, either. This is what trials are for.
The upside. At trial, you will have the chance to tell your side of the story, even if I dispute it. The judge or a jury will hear both sides and decide who is telling the truth.
The downside. A trial is a gamble. Will the jury side with your CEO, or with my co-worker and me? Who knows?
True story: Years ago, we had a witness, a genuinely good guy. After the trial, we talked to the jurors and found out that they hated him and thought he was a liar because he had shifty eyes during his testimony. In fact, he was squinting because he was wearing the old-fashioned kind of "hard" contact lenses. (If you remember those, they were VERY uncomfortable.) In front of a jury or even a judge, things like this matter. On a motion to dismiss or summary judgment, they don't because everything is submitted in writing to the court, possibly with some live arguments by the lawyers.
In addition, a trial is the most time-consuming, expensive, and disruptive of these three options. Even if you win in the end.
- Partner
Robin has more than 30 years' experience counseling employers and representing them before government agencies and in employment litigation involving Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with ...
Robin Shea has 30 years' experience in employment litigation, including Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act (including the Amendments Act).
Continue Reading
Subscribe
Contributors
- William A. "Zan" Blue, Jr.
- Obasi Bryant
- Kenneth P. Carlson, Jr.
- James M. Coleman
- Cara Yates Crotty
- Lara C. de Leon
- Christopher R. Deubert
- Joyce M. Dos Santos
- Colin Finnegan
- Steven B. Katz
- Ellen C. Kearns
- F. Damon Kitchen
- David C. Kurtz
- Angelique Groza Lyons
- John E. MacDonald
- Kelly McGrath
- Alyssa K. Peters
- Sarah M. Phaff
- David P. Phippen
- William K. Principe
- Sabrina M. Punia-Ly
- Angela L. Rapko
- Rachael Rustmann
- Paul Ryan
- Piyumi M. Samaratunga
- Robin E. Shea
- Kristine Marie Sims
- David L. Smith
- Jill S. Stricklin
- Jack R. Wallace
Archives
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010