And dads get to play, too.
After all, we wouldn't be moms without you! ;-)
Happy Mother's Day weekend! How much do you know about moms in the workplace? Take our quiz and find out! As always, the answers appear at the end of each question, so you can cheat all you want. (But don't tell your mom.)
At the end, there's a bouquet of roses, just for you.
Ready? Here we go:
No. 1: Your best, most indispensable employee unexpectedly comes to you and tells you that she is pregnant. The baby will be due during your most hectic time of year, and you honestly don't know how the work will get done while she is out. What is the best response?
A. Great. Having you out of work for 12 weeks is just what I need right now. Not.
B. You know, the times, they are a'changin'. You should let your husband stay home with the kid. I'll even have Purchasing get you a footstool so you can put your feet up while you work.
C. Congratulations! That is wonderful news. I'm really happy for you.
D. How could you do this to me? Did you forget your birth control, or did it just fail?
ANSWER: C. No matter what, C is always the correct answer.
No. 2: You hire Mary for a loading dock position. Her first week of work, she tells Human Resources that she is five months pregnant and has been told by her obstetrician that she can't lift more than 10 pounds. The loading dock job requires employees to be able to lift up to 100 pounds. What do you do?
A. Consider whether her lifting restriction can be accommodated, and discuss it with her. Consider transferring her to a non-lifting position if you have a vacancy for which she is qualified. If Mary can be accommodated, accommodate. Otherwise, if you offer light duty to employees with work-related injuries, consider offering a light duty position to her. If none of those options is available, place her on a medical leave until the situation changes.
B. Fire Mary for failing to disclose her pregnancy when she applied for the job, or at least tell her that you'll never be able to trust her again.
C. Put Mary on leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act.
D. Ignore the doctor's note and make her keep lifting 100 pounds. It's her fault for not telling you that she was pregnant before you hired her.
ANSWER: A. Since at least 2015, when the U.S. Supreme Court issued its ruling in Young v. United Parcel Service, employers have been required to try to accommodate pregnancy-related restrictions if they accommodate employees with similar restrictions that are not pregnancy-related. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission takes the position that if an employer offers "make-work" light duty for on-the-job injuries, it must do so for employees with pregnancy-related restrictions. (NOTE: The Supreme Court ruling did not go that far, and I'd love to see an employer challenge the EEOC's position, but as yet no one has.)
Mary is not eligible for FMLA leave because she hasn't worked for you long enough. And requiring an employee to violate known medical restrictions is a terrible idea.
No. 3: Janet's 30-year-old daughter, who lives across the country, is expecting. Janet asks to take two weeks off to fly out and stay with her after the baby is born. Janet has worked for you for seven years and has never taken FMLA leave. Which of the following answers is legally incorrect?
A. Congratulations! I hope everything goes well. Of course, you can take FMLA leave for your daughter and new grandbaby. Please give your daughter our best, and give that baby a big kiss from us!
B. Congratulations! I hope everything goes well. You don't qualify for FMLA leave, but of course we'll be glad to give you two weeks off. You can use your vacation time or PTO if you want to be paid, or if you'd prefer, we can give you a two-week unpaid "non-FMLA leave of absence." Either way, we'll be here for you when you get back, and don't forget to bring lots of pictures of that beautiful baby!
C. Congratulations! I hope everything goes well. Unfortunately, your time off would hit right at our busiest time of the year, so I'm gonna have to say no. Please give our best to your daughter, and have her email some pictures of the baby!
ANSWER: A is legally incorrect. Janet's leave would not be covered under the FMLA because it's for an adult daughter, and FMLA leave for adult children is not available unless the son or daughter (1) has a serious health condition, and (2) is "incapable of self-care because of a physical or mental disability." "Disability" is interpreted the same way it would be under the Americans with Disabilities Act. (For more on adult children and the FMLA, check this out.)
Assuming a normal delivery without complications, Janet's adult daughter's childbirth would not qualify Janet for FMLA leave. (If Janet's daughter were 16 years old, it would be a different story.) And, of course, FMLA leave is not available for grandchildren.
(Even though C is legally correct, we much prefer answer B.)
No. 4: Janet's co-worker, Margaret, has a 28-year-old son who has been working as an expatriate in Belarus. Margaret just learned that her son has been diagnosed with lung cancer. Margaret asks for an extended leave of absence to go to Belarus and help care for him while he undergoes chemotherapy and radiation treatment. Like Janet, Margaret has worked for you for seven years and has never taken FMLA leave. Which of the following answers is legally incorrect?
A. I am so sorry. Of course, you can take FMLA leave. Here is the paperwork. I realize it may take a while to get it all completed by your son's doctor in Belarus. Just get it completed and back to us when you can. You have 12 weeks of job-protected leave available, and if you still need to be out there afterward, let us know, and we'll try to work with you. We'll keep you and your son in our thoughts and prayers.
B. I am so sorry. I hate to give you any more bad news, but because your son is an adult, you do not qualify for FMLA leave. Under the law, you can take FMLA leave for an adult child only if (1) the child has a serious health condition, and (2) the child is "incapable of self-care because of a physical or mental disability" within the meaning of the ADA. Your son meets the first requirement, but not the second. Of course, we'll still let you take a leave of absence to go to Belarus, and we can hold your job for a few weeks. You're welcome to use your vacation or PTO until it's exhausted. We'll keep you and your son in our thoughts and prayers.
ANSWER: B is legally incorrect. In this case, the employer is taking too narrow a view of "disability." Cancer is both an FMLA-qualifying serious health condition and an ADA-covered disability. Therefore, at a minimum, Margaret should be given the full 12 weeks of job-protected FMLA leave.
No. 5: Tiffani, who is one occurrence away from termination for attendance, asks for two hours off so that she can attend the parent-teacher conference for her bratty third grader, Iodine. What do you tell Tiffani?
A. We cannot authorize any more time off for you until an occurrence comes off your record. To do that, you'll need to have perfect attendance between now and July 15. Can you get the school to move Iodine's conference until late July? Oh, yeah, I forgot - school will be out then. Maybe next September?
B. Go ahead, but we'll need documentation from the school, and you'll need to be back here in two hours.
C. Do whatever you want, but keep in mind that you are one occurrence away from termination, and this would be an occurrence.
D. Let me check with our company's lawyers, and I'll get back to you.
ANSWER: B, in many jurisdictions. In some states, employers are required to allow parents to take a limited amount of job-protected time off to attend their children's school conferences. Many of these laws allow the employer to ask for some sort of documentation. If you aren't sure about the law in your jurisdiction, D is a perfectly fine answer, too -- although I probably wouldn't mention the lawyers.
No. 6: You are manager of an upscale kitchen store at the local mall. One of your sales clerks, Sophia, just returned from maternity leave. She is nursing and needs to take breaks during her shift to express milk. Your store doesn't sell clothes, so you don't have any dressing rooms. There is one small office in the back with a video surveillance camera and a door that doesn't lock. The rest of your space is open to customers. What do you do?
A. Tell Sophia that she'll just have to "hold it" until she gets home from work.
B. Tell Sophia to use a stall in the mall bathrooms.
C. Tell Sophia to go down to The Gap and borrow one of their dressing rooms.
D. Go to the hardware store, buy a bar lock, attach it to the office door in the back of your space, and ask your Regional Manager for permission to turn off the video surveillance camera in the office (or to securely cover the lens so that any video is completely blacked out). If the Regional Manager says no, appeal to HR. Teach Sophia how to turn the video camera on and off (or to cover the lens) so that she can do it herself and assure herself that she has complete privacy. Then let Sophia use the office. And don't forget to get reimbursed for that bar lock!
ANSWER: D. Lactation breaks can be difficult for retail stores because of limited space, customer access, and video surveillance. In one lawsuit brought under the Nursing Mothers Act, the manager allegedly told the mother to throw a towel over the surveillance camera. That is not good enough. If a video camera has to be covered, the employer should make sure that the lens is really covered -- in other words, that no light (and inadvertent recording) seeps through. It's even better if the employee can be taught how to turn the camera on and off so that she is in control of her own privacy.
HOW'DJA DO?
5-6 correct: Perfect in every way! You are "Marmee" March!
3-4 correct: Good! You are Aurora in Terms of Endearment. A little quirky, but you would do anything for your daughter.
1-2 correct: "Yes, Mommie Dearest."
0 correct: Eeek! Throw Momma From the Train!
Just kidding! You all did great! And here's that bouquet of roses I promised you:
Awwww. Now I'm feeling sentimental. Happy Mother's Day weekend to you and yours!
Image Credits: Still images from flickr, Creative Commons license. First Mother's Day card by Amber Strocel, second Mother's Day card (in two parts) by Cyndi and Dave, third Mother's Day card by Matthew Rutledge.
- Partner
Robin has more than 30 years' experience counseling employers and representing them before government agencies and in employment litigation involving Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with ...
Robin Shea has 30 years' experience in employment litigation, including Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act (including the Amendments Act).
Continue Reading
Subscribe
Contributors
- William A. "Zan" Blue, Jr.
- Obasi Bryant
- Kenneth P. Carlson, Jr.
- James M. Coleman
- Cara Yates Crotty
- Lara C. de Leon
- Christopher R. Deubert
- Joyce M. Dos Santos
- Colin Finnegan
- Steven B. Katz
- Ellen C. Kearns
- F. Damon Kitchen
- David C. Kurtz
- Angelique Groza Lyons
- John E. MacDonald
- Alyssa K. Peters
- Sarah M. Phaff
- David P. Phippen
- William K. Principe
- Sabrina M. Punia-Ly
- Angela L. Rapko
- Rachael Rustmann
- Paul Ryan
- Robin E. Shea
- Kristine Marie Sims
- David L. Smith
- Jill S. Stricklin
- Jack R. Wallace
Archives
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010