Fair Pay & Safe Workplaces Rule is on the chopping block
Heidi Wilbur
Heidi Wilbur

In good news for federal contractors, Congress has taken its first step toward permanently blocking implementation of the Fair Pay & Safe Workplaces Rule, also known as the contractor “Blacklisting” Rule.  As we have discussed previously, the Rule (which includes regulations and guidance implementing President Obama’s Executive Order 13673) requires federal contractors bidding on contracts worth at least $500,000 to self-report “violations” of various labor and employment laws.

Because of the broad scope of the Rule’s reporting obligations, implementation of the Rule was expected to effectively blacklist contractors based on purported violations that had not been subject to judicial review or that were not final decisions. For example, an administrative agency could potentially use preliminary determinations -- such as a decision by a Regional Office of the National Labor Relations Board to issue a complaint, or a "cause" determination by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission -- to block access to federal contracts, a scary prospect for any contractor. In October 2016, a federal judge in Texas issued an injunction that temporarily prevented significant portions of the Rule from going into effect.

With the Rule still on hold in the court system, Republicans in the House of Representatives are planning to use a little-known legislative tool to make the Blacklisting Rule disappear for good.

On Monday, Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-NC) introduced a joint resolution of disapproval under the Congressional Review Act. The CRA became law in 1996 and allows Congress a limited period of time in which to overrule a regulation through use of a joint resolution, essentially giving Congress a legislative veto.  To block implementation of the Rule, the joint resolution must be passed by both houses and either signed by the President or passed over the President’s veto by two-thirds of the House and Senate.

Lego execution.PublicDomain
Will Fair Pay & Safe Workplaces Rule meet its doom?

The CRA has been successfully used to invalidate a regulation only once -- in March 2001. Then, Congress and President George W. Bush disapproved a controversial regulation that required employers to take measures to prevent ergonomic injuries. (The regulation had been issued by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration in November 2000, in the eleventh hour of the Clinton Administration.)

Given that Republicans currently control both houses of Congress, and with President Trump in the White House, it seems likely that the joint resolution of disapproval of the Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces Rule will move forward. If the disapproval resolution is passed and signed by the President, the Rule will not take effect. But not only that -- in addition, federal agencies will not be able to issue a substantially similar rule without specific authorization from Congress.

Protections for LGBT Employees of Federal Contractors Will Continue

As noted on this blog yesterday, the White House has announced that President Trump will continue to enforce President Obama’s Executive Order banning sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination by federal contractors.

The Executive Order, signed in 2014, extended anti-discrimination protection to LGBT employees of federal contractors. According to the White House, the executive order “will remain intact” under the new administration, which presumably means that the Order will not be amended to add an exemption for religious organizations.

Photo of Lego "execution" in public domain.

This is Constangy’s flagship law blog, founded in 2010 by Robin Shea, who is chief legal editor and a regular contributor. This nationally recognized blog also features posts from other Constangy attorneys in the areas of immigration, labor relations, and sports law, keeping HR professionals and employers informed about the latest legal trends.

Search

Get Updates By Email

Subscribe

Archives

Legal Influencer Lexology Badge ABA Web 100 Badge
Jump to Page

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When using this website, Constangy and certain third parties may collect and use cookies or similar technologies to enhance your experience. These technologies may collect information about your device, activity on our website, and preferences. Some cookies are essential to site functionality, while others help us analyze performance and usage trends to improve our content and features.

Please note that if you return to this website from a different browser or device, you may need to reselect your cookie preferences.

For more information about our privacy practices, including your rights and choices, please see our Privacy Policy. 

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Strictly Necessary Cookies are essential for the website to function, and cannot be turned off. We use this type of cookie for purposes such as security, network management, and accessibility. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but if you do so, some parts of the site will not work. 

Functionality Cookies

Always Active

Functionality Cookies are used to enhance the functionality and personalization of this website. These cookies support features like embedded content (such as video or audio), keyword search highlighting, and remembering your preferences across pages—for example, your cookie choices or form inputs during submission.

Some of these cookies are managed by third-party service providers whose features are embedded on our site. These cookies do not store personal information and are necessary for certain site features to work properly.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek