Adopt an arbitration program that covers class, collective claims

Guest post by Tommy Eden, a partner in Constangy's Opelika, Alabama, and West Point, Georgia, offices.

In all the hoopla over the Supreme Court’s Hobby Lobby decision last week, it may have been lost that the Court refused to review a circuit court decision compelling arbitration in a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

All federal courts of appeal to decide the issue so far have found that an employee may waive his or her right to bring an FLSA collective action in court through a valid arbitration agreement. That would include the Second, Fourth, Fifth, Eighth, and Eleventh Circuits. (For a listing of the states governed by these circuits, please go to the jump at the bottom of this page.)

In Walthour v. Chipio Windshield Repair, LLC, the decision that the Supreme Court declined to review, the plaintiffs alleged failure to pay minimum wage, overtime, and FLSA recordkeeping violations. The employers moved to compel arbitration, citing mandatory arbitration agreements that the plaintiffs had signed shortly after they were hired. The agreements specified that all employment disputes, including class claims, were to be resolved exclusively through individual arbitration. A federal district court in Georgia granted the employers’ motion and dismissed the lawsuit. The plaintiffs appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, which affirmed the dismissal.

The plaintiffs then asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review the 11th Circuit decision, and last week the Court declined. This doesn’t necessarily mean that the Supreme Court agrees with the 11th Circuit, but it does mean that the decision stands for the time being. So far, every federal appeals court to address the issue has found that the FLSA does not provide a non-waivable, substantive right to bring a collective action.

Employers who want to ensure that they can arbitrate FLSA collective and other claims should consider adopting the following:

*An internal complaint process, including a toll-free hotline, with a “no-retaliation” promise

*Multiple channels for employees to make complaints, published in the employee handbook and in other conspicuous places throughout your facilities

*Training for employees on the complaint process and how to use it

*An arbitration agreement that complies with the law and covers class and collective claims, using arbitrators from AAA or another respected source.

Although arbitration is no panacea, it is generally faster and more efficient than litigation in court. Moreover, a recent study by Cornell University on arbitration of discrimination claims indicated that plaintiffs were successful about 36 percent of the time in court, but only about 21 percent of the time in arbitration, and the plaintiffs who won in arbitration won smaller awards than they did in court. It’s possible that the win-loss results in arbitration of FLSA cases might be similarly employer-friendly. (On the other hand, there may not be much difference in the damages awarded because the FLSA does not provide for recovery of compensatory and punitive damages.)

To see which federal circuit court of appeals covers which states, read on.

The U.S. Courts of Appeal hear appeals from federal courts in their designated states.

Second Circuit: Connecticut, New York, Vermont

Fourth Circuit: Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, West Virginia

Fifth Circuit: Louisiana, Mississippi, Texas

Eighth Circuit: Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota

Eleventh Circuit: Alabama, Florida, Georgia

This is Constangy’s flagship law blog, founded in 2010 by Robin Shea, who is chief legal editor and a regular contributor. This nationally recognized blog also features posts from other Constangy attorneys in the areas of immigration, labor relations, and sports law, keeping HR professionals and employers informed about the latest legal trends.

Search

Get Updates By Email

Subscribe

Archives

Legal Influencer Lexology Badge ABA Web 100 Badge
Jump to Page

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When using this website, Constangy and certain third parties may collect and use cookies or similar technologies to enhance your experience. These technologies may collect information about your device, activity on our website, and preferences. Some cookies are essential to site functionality, while others help us analyze performance and usage trends to improve our content and features.

Please note that if you return to this website from a different browser or device, you may need to reselect your cookie preferences.

For more information about our privacy practices, including your rights and choices, please see our Privacy Policy. 

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Strictly Necessary Cookies are essential for the website to function, and cannot be turned off. We use this type of cookie for purposes such as security, network management, and accessibility. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but if you do so, some parts of the site will not work. 

Functionality Cookies

Always Active

Functionality Cookies are used to enhance the functionality and personalization of this website. These cookies support features like embedded content (such as video or audio), keyword search highlighting, and remembering your preferences across pages—for example, your cookie choices or form inputs during submission.

Some of these cookies are managed by third-party service providers whose features are embedded on our site. These cookies do not store personal information and are necessary for certain site features to work properly.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek