Happy holiday weekend!
With the Fourth of July approaching, we will go out with a bang.
How much do you know about employment law in the news from this week or so? Take our quiz and find out! As always, the answers appear immediately after each question, so you can cheat all you want. (But you should know that cheating is un-American.) At the end, there will be a special Fourth of July surprise just for you.
Ready? Here we go!
No. 1: The U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division, issued three opinion letters on Monday. Which correctly summarizes one of the letters?
A. The threshold for "exempt" status under the Fair Labor Standards Act will increase to $33,000 effective August 1.
B. The "8 and 80 rule" will now apply to all employers, and not just those in the healthcare industry.
C. To be exempt as a "highly compensated employee" under the FLSA, a paralegal must be paid at least $100,000 a year (among other things).
D. The Portal-to-Portal Act will be repealed.
ANSWER: C. In addition to the opinion letter about paralegals' "exempt" status, the Wage and Hour Division issued letters about how to calculate the regular rate when employees receive a non-discretionary bonus and "rounding time."
No. 2: According to the Daily Mail, an employee in Iowa City pressed criminal charges against her boss for some (alleged) disgusting conduct on his part. What did the boss allegedly do?
A. Left a "spy pen" in the conference room where the employee, a nursing mother, was expressing milk, which allowed him to record her exposing her breasts without her knowledge or consent.
B. Left the seat up in the unisex bathroom.
C. Spit in her coffee while she wasn't looking.
D. Picked his nose in her presence.
E. All of the above.
ANSWER: A. And, although everyone is presumed innocent until found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, it doesn't look good for the owner of this architectural firm. After the female employee found the pen and determined that it had a USB port, the police raided the boss's office and home, and found 22 secret videos of the employee. The owner reportedly explained that he thought the employee was "very beautiful" and he just wanted to see what was under her shirt. Oh, well, then. Is that all? OK.
No. 3: Last week, the Trump Administration agreed to delay the start of an employment-related initiative that was supposed to take effect soon. What was it?
A. Protection of political conservatives from discrimination.
B. A law prohibiting Congressional Democrats from subpoenaing employees' income tax returns.
C. Religious conscience protections for employees and students in the healthcare industry.
D. A jobs program for out-of-work Buzzfeed columnists.
ANSWER: C. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services issued final regulations that would prohibit healthcare employers from discriminating against employees and students who had religious objections to certain medical procedures, such as abortion or gender reassignment. The regulations were scheduled to take effect this month, but last week the DHHS said it was willing to delay the regulations' implementation until November 22 while various legal challenges to the regulations are pending.
No. 4: The governor of a state in the Ninth Circuit has signed into law legislation that makes it illegal for employers to refuse employment because an applicant tests positive for marijuana. Which state is it?
A. California, of course!
B. Washington
C. Oregon
D. Hawaii
E. Nevada
F. Massachusetts
ANSWER: E. OK, the legislation was actually signed into law on June 5, but I didn't realize it until now. Medical and recreational marijuana use are legal in Nevada. The law will take effect January 1, 2020, and has exceptions for firefighters, emergency medical technicians, and employees who operate motor vehicles and are required by federal or state law to be tested. The statute also has a catchall exception for positions "[t]hat, in the determination of the employer, could adversely affect the safety of others." The law will not override conflicting provisions in a collective bargaining agreement or employment contract, or federal law (such as DOT regulations).
No. 5: At least 206 employers have filed an amicus curiae ("friend of the court") brief in connection with a big pending case involving a Title VII issue. What is the issue?
A. Whether sexual harassment must be "severe or pervasive" to be actionable under Title VII.
B. Whether Title VII prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity.
C. Whether discipline is an "adverse employment action" for purposes of a retaliation claim under Title VII.
D. Whether "exhaustion of administrative remedies" is a jurisdictional requirement or, instead, an affirmative defense that can be waived by an employer who fails to raise it in a timely manner.
E. A and D.
F. All of the above.
ANSWER: B. As our regular readers know, the U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to review two sexual orientation cases that will be considered together -- Bostock v. Clayton County and Altitude Express v. Zarda -- and one transgender case that will be considered separately -- R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes v. EEOC. The amicus brief will be filed today in both cases, and, not surprisingly, the companies want the Court to find that Title VII prohibits discrimination based on LGBT status. Among the companies that have signed on are Amazon, Apple, Coca-Cola, The Hartford, Microsoft, the Tampa Bay Rays, The Walt Disney Company, and Williams-Sonoma.
HOW'DJA DO?
5 correct: You are George Washington, John Adams, and Thomas Jefferson rolled up into one! Great job!
3-4 correct: Nice work! John Hancock, at the very least!
1-2 correct: Er, uh, someone who once met someone who knew John Hancock's eighth cousin, twice removed?
0 correct: Eek! Benedict Arnold!
Just kidding! You all did great. Now, here is that Fourth of July surprise that I promised you:
Because of the holiday, this is my "Friday" post for the week. I hope you all have a safe and happy Fourth!
Image Credits: Still images from flickr, Creative Commons license. Fireworks montage by Kai Schreiber, bespectacled women by fivehanks.
- Partner
Robin has more than 30 years' experience counseling employers and representing them before government agencies and in employment litigation involving Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with ...
Robin Shea has 30 years' experience in employment litigation, including Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act (including the Amendments Act).
Continue Reading
Subscribe
Contributors
- William A. "Zan" Blue, Jr.
- Obasi Bryant
- Kenneth P. Carlson, Jr.
- James M. Coleman
- Cara Yates Crotty
- Lara C. de Leon
- Christopher R. Deubert
- Joyce M. Dos Santos
- Colin Finnegan
- Steven B. Katz
- Ellen C. Kearns
- F. Damon Kitchen
- David C. Kurtz
- Angelique Groza Lyons
- John E. MacDonald
- Alyssa K. Peters
- Sarah M. Phaff
- David P. Phippen
- William K. Principe
- Sabrina M. Punia-Ly
- Angela L. Rapko
- Rachael Rustmann
- Paul Ryan
- Robin E. Shea
- Kristine Marie Sims
- David L. Smith
- Jill S. Stricklin
- Jack R. Wallace
Archives
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010