The times, they are a'changin'.
Wasn't it nice of me to give you a week and a half off to recover from the election?
I hope everyone is safe and strong again, and ready to talk about what employers can expect from President Trump's second term. Here's a bipartisan summary of what we expect to see.
Labor law. I predict that Jennifer Abruzzo, General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board, will be fired if she doesn’t quit first. (President Biden fired the Trump-appointed Board GC within days of taking office.) GC Abruzzo has taken very aggressive positions adverse to employers during her tenure, so her expected departure would not make me cry. President Trump can name a new Chairman of the NLRB. The only Republican on the Board now is Marvin Kaplan, who was first appointed during President Trump's first term. I'm gonna go out on a limb and predict that the new Chairman of the Board (get it?) will be Member Kaplan.
The President can't get new NLRB members confirmed by the Senate until the current members’ terms expire, but there is currently one vacant Republican seat, so he may be able to get that position filled right away. (Unless President Biden beats him to it.) The term of the current Chairman, Democrat Lauren McFerran, will expire next month, giving President Trump another vacancy. The terms of the other Democratic members will not expire until 2026 and 2028.
With a new GC, at least the "vision" for the Board should become more even-handed right away. This outstanding bulletin by Colin Finnegan of our Kansas City Office, written before the election, has much more.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. In my experience, political shifts don't cause dramatic changes at the investigator or district director levels. They're the same (good, at least in North Carolina) folks, whether the president is Bush Sr., Clinton, W, Obama, Trump, or Biden. But bigger changes could take place at the higher levels. I would expect Trump II to promptly inform General Counsel Karla Gilbride that her services are no longer required. (As with the NLRB, President Biden fired the EEOC's Trump-appointed General Counsel not long after he took office in 2021.)
The Commission itself currently has only one Republican, Andrea Lucas, who was appointed by -- you guessed it -- Trump I. I would expect Trump II to appoint Commissioner Lucas as Chair, and nominate another Republican to fill a vacant seat and, assuming Senate confirmation follows, name that individual Vice Chair. Then the current chair, Charlotte Burrows, Vice Chair Jocelyn Samuels, and Commissioner Kalpana Kotagal -- all Democrats -- would stay on until their terms expire. Chair Burrows' term won't expire until 2028, Vice Chair Samuels' term expires in 2026, and Ms. Kotagal's term expires in 2027. (Ms. Lucas's term expires in July 2025, but I would expect President Trump to nominate her for another term.) When Vice Chair Samuels' term expires in 2026, President Trump would have the opportunity to nominate a Republican and if the nominee is confirmed by the Senate, the EEOC would have a Republican majority.
Once the EEOC has a Republican majority again, I would expect it to either rescind or revise its recent Enforcement Guidance on Workplace Harassment, toning down (if not removing) the provisions relating to use of pronouns and preferred names, and restroom rules, as forms of unlawful gender identity harassment. Commissioner Lucas has been sharply critical of these provisions. We may also see more explicit provisions relating to reasonable accommodation of employees' religious beliefs in this regard.
The EEOC might also promulgate revised regulations under the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act to remove the requirement that employers make reasonable accommodations for employees having elective abortions. Both the Enforcement Guidance and the PWFA regulations are being challenged in the courts on these grounds, so removing those provisions would presumably make the lawsuits moot. Apart from that, I would not envision radical changes at the EEOC under a second Trump Administration.
The Department of Labor
As of Thursday night as I was writing this post, President Trump had not yet identified a nominee for Secretary of Labor. But we can safely assume that he would name someone relatively employer-friendly. If that's correct, then here is what we might expect in the areas of wage and hour, OSHA, and affirmative action (with a little help from my friends):
Wage and Hour. The salary threshold for the white-collar exemptions to the overtime requirements under the Fair Labor Standards Act increased in July and is due to increase again on January 1, before President Trump is inaugurated. So I would expect that January increase to go into effect as scheduled unless a court enjoins it. Once President Trump takes office and his Secretary of Labor is confirmed, new regulations could be issued. However, any new regulations would have to go through the notice-and-comment period, which could take a while. Also, a reversal -- especially where people's pay is concerned -- may be more difficult to pull off than merely putting on the brakes. So we'll have to see. For more on this issue, please see the excellent bulletins by Jim Coleman and Ellen Kearns, chairs of our firm's Wage and Hour Practice Group, here, here, and here.
The DOL during the Biden Administration also issued independent contractor regulations which -- to oversimplify like crazy -- made it much more difficult for a worker to be classified as an independent contractor as opposed to an employee. Under a second Trump Administration, those regulations are likely to be replaced by regulations that reinstate the more contractor-friendly standard that the first Trump Administration tried to put in place.
I wouldn't expect any radical changes to the DOL's current interpretation of the Family and Medical Leave Act.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration. I admit it. For this one I didn't dare to even summarize! Instead, I asked Bill Principe and Pat Tyson, the chairs of our Workplace Safety Practice Group, to provide their insights. Here is what Bill said (and Pat agreed):
You can expect any proposed OSHA Standards, such as the Heat Stress Prevention Standard, to get stalled if not completely withdrawn. The new head of OSHA will be someone from the business community, if the position is filled at all. During the first term, as Compliance Officers left the Agency, they weren’t replaced or at least the replacements were slowed down significantly. If there are vacancies at the OSH Review Commission, you can expect them not to get filled. There will be more emphasis on compliance assistance than enforcement, although it will not be very useful assistance. But, enforcement will continue with large penalties as happens now. The personnel in Area and Regional Offices will be unchanged and will largely be free to continue to do their jobs, business as usual. There will not be the promotion of retaliation or whistleblower cases to the same extent as under the present Administration."
Bill added that the regulations allowing third parties to accompany OSHA inspectors has not been a major issue but that the new Trump Administration may still roll that back.
Affirmative Action. This is another area where I thought it best to quote a higher authority -- Cara Crotty, head of our Affirmative Action/OFCCP Compliance Practice Group and also co-chair of our new Diversity Equity & Inclusion Practice Group. Here's what Cara had to say:
The OFCCP in the second Trump administration is likely to look a lot like the first. The agenda may include
♦Focusing on contractors’ questionable DEI policies and practices that could constitute reverse discrimination
♦Reissuing an executive order prohibiting “divisive” training by contractors
♦Returning to enforcement procedures that the Biden administration rescinded
♦Providing more transparency to contractors regarding agency practices
♦Ensuring religious organizations have clear and appropriate exemptions
♦Eliminating Executive Order 11246 altogether
Wait, what? According to Cara, I read that last one right:
Regarding the final bullet, conservative pundits have suggested that President Trump could rescind the presidential order issued by President Lyndon Johnson, which requires federal contractors to recruit women and minorities and to develop 'affirmative action plans' analyzing the racial and gender demographics of employees. Such a rescission would be a radical change for contractors and would dramatically alter their compliance obligations."
Whoa. Glad I asked. It never occurred to me that abolition of E.O. 11246 was in the cards.
BONUS: Judicial appointments
As most people know, during his first term, President Trump had beaucoups of judicial appointment opportunities, including three U.S. Supreme Court justices (Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett). He won't have quite so many this time, but as of this morning there were 45 judicial vacancies in the federal courts and only 15 pending nominations. Even if all 15 nominees are confirmed, that would give President Trump 30 seats to fill, which isn't too shabby. And in addition to the 45 current vacancies, there are 20 future vacancies (for example, when a judge gives notice of intent to step down or take senior status). For those future vacancies, there are already 11 pending nominations, so really only about nine positions that President Trump might be able to fill, assuming President Biden's nominees are confirmed.
Of course, a burning question is whether Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas (age 76) and Samuel Alito (age 74) will decide to step down after President Trump takes office so that he can nominate their successors. Some Democrats are encouraging Justice Sonya Sotomayor (age 70) to step down now so that President Biden might have a shot at appointing her successor. (Justice Sotomayor has replied, in so many words, "Nope.")
Interesting times! We will keep you posted.
- Partner
Robin has more than 30 years' experience counseling employers and representing them before government agencies and in employment litigation involving Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with ...
Robin Shea has 30 years' experience in employment litigation, including Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act (including the Amendments Act).
Continue Reading
Subscribe
Contributors
- William A. "Zan" Blue, Jr.
- Obasi Bryant
- Kenneth P. Carlson, Jr.
- James M. Coleman
- Cara Yates Crotty
- Lara C. de Leon
- Christopher R. Deubert
- Joyce M. Dos Santos
- Colin Finnegan
- Steven B. Katz
- Ellen C. Kearns
- F. Damon Kitchen
- David C. Kurtz
- Angelique Groza Lyons
- John E. MacDonald
- Kelly McGrath
- Alyssa K. Peters
- Sarah M. Phaff
- David P. Phippen
- William K. Principe
- Sabrina M. Punia-Ly
- Angela L. Rapko
- Rachael Rustmann
- Paul Ryan
- Piyumi M. Samaratunga
- Robin E. Shea
- Kristine Marie Sims
- David L. Smith
- Jill S. Stricklin
- Jack R. Wallace
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010